Resilience and dynamism: Innovative modeling of ecological group dynamics in urban landscapes

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107613
Yongyang Wang , Yanpeng Cai , Yulei Xie , Pan Zhang , Lei Chen
{"title":"Resilience and dynamism: Innovative modeling of ecological group dynamics in urban landscapes","authors":"Yongyang Wang ,&nbsp;Yanpeng Cai ,&nbsp;Yulei Xie ,&nbsp;Pan Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enhancing urban ecological resilience can promote sustainable and eco-friendly urban development by reducing environmental risks and vulnerabilities. However, current studies rarely offered ecological resilience assessment method along with an understanding of the coevolution mechanisms. In this study, we selected Guangzhou as the study area to create a dynamics model to diagnose the coevolution mechanism, and quantify ecological resilience according to the depiction of the basin of attribution. The results showed that 1) there were 535 ecological patches covering an area of 121,628 ha and featuring 1229 edges and 11 ecological groups. 2)The northern and eastern regions showed relatively high closeness and betweenness centralities, however, straightness centrality was lower in these areas; the ecological edges were presented lower connectivity in the northern and southern regions. 3) By using nonlinear dynamic equation, the origin state of each group increased toward the equilibrium point E3 suggested a declining trend in ecological sustainability under current conditions. The ecological resilience was decreased from Group 8 to Group 5. This research will help to understand the coevolution mechanism of the urban system for giving practical suggestions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 107613"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing urban ecological resilience can promote sustainable and eco-friendly urban development by reducing environmental risks and vulnerabilities. However, current studies rarely offered ecological resilience assessment method along with an understanding of the coevolution mechanisms. In this study, we selected Guangzhou as the study area to create a dynamics model to diagnose the coevolution mechanism, and quantify ecological resilience according to the depiction of the basin of attribution. The results showed that 1) there were 535 ecological patches covering an area of 121,628 ha and featuring 1229 edges and 11 ecological groups. 2)The northern and eastern regions showed relatively high closeness and betweenness centralities, however, straightness centrality was lower in these areas; the ecological edges were presented lower connectivity in the northern and southern regions. 3) By using nonlinear dynamic equation, the origin state of each group increased toward the equilibrium point E3 suggested a declining trend in ecological sustainability under current conditions. The ecological resilience was decreased from Group 8 to Group 5. This research will help to understand the coevolution mechanism of the urban system for giving practical suggestions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复原力与活力:城市景观中生态群落动态的创新建模
提高城市生态复原力可以降低环境风险和脆弱性,从而促进可持续的生态友好型城市发展。然而,目前的研究很少提供生态恢复力评估方法以及对协同演化机制的理解。在本研究中,我们选择广州作为研究区域,建立动态模型来诊断协同演化机制,并根据流域归因的描述来量化生态恢复力。结果表明:1)生态斑块数量为 535 个,面积为 121 628 公顷,边缘数量为 1229 个,生态群落数量为 11 个。2)北部和东部地区的接近中心度和间度中心度相对较高,但直线中心度较低;北部和南部地区的生态边缘连通性较低。3) 利用非线性动态方程,各组的起源状态向均衡点 E3 增加,表明在当前条件下生态可持续性呈下降趋势。该研究将有助于理解城市系统的协同演化机制,并提出切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1