Linking innovations adoption with farm sustainability: Empirical evidence from rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing in Tanzania

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106732
{"title":"Linking innovations adoption with farm sustainability: Empirical evidence from rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing in Tanzania","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food insecurity and poverty are of major concern for farmers and rural households in Tanzania. Innovations to increase the sustainability of households must be carefully investigated by integrating, in the analysis, the effect on crop yields with a holistic view on the overall sustainability and its components. Rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing can increase food security, particularly in water-limited contexts, but they can also significantly increase labor requirements and the availability and use of water resources in villages and watersheds. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impacts of rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing on environmental, social and economic sustainability of households in two regions in Tanzania – semi-arid Dodoma and semi-humid Morogoro. We selected and calculated 40 sustainability indicators for 892 households in 2013 and 2016, and we applied Difference-in-Difference Propensity Score Matching to identify relative changes in household sustainability. We show that in the dry region of Dodoma, economic sustainability increased less for adopters of the innovations in comparison to non-adopters between the years 2013 and 2016, with 6 percentage points and 11 percentage points respectively. In contrast, in the humid region, the adoption of innovations increased food security by 14 percentage points compared to 6 percentage points in the case of non-adoption. These results highlight that innovations must fit the context and should not be scaled without prior analysis of multiple impact dimensions as they may trigger significant trade-offs. By moving the focus from field to farm scale, this study contributes to providing a more rigorous assessment of the spillover effects that in-field innovations can have on the overall sustainability of households, which is a prerequisite for the advancement of sustainable intensification of agricultural production in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X2400202X/pdfft?md5=49ad5219135b4894ed63f8f1744ee49b&pid=1-s2.0-S0305750X2400202X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X2400202X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food insecurity and poverty are of major concern for farmers and rural households in Tanzania. Innovations to increase the sustainability of households must be carefully investigated by integrating, in the analysis, the effect on crop yields with a holistic view on the overall sustainability and its components. Rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing can increase food security, particularly in water-limited contexts, but they can also significantly increase labor requirements and the availability and use of water resources in villages and watersheds. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impacts of rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing on environmental, social and economic sustainability of households in two regions in Tanzania – semi-arid Dodoma and semi-humid Morogoro. We selected and calculated 40 sustainability indicators for 892 households in 2013 and 2016, and we applied Difference-in-Difference Propensity Score Matching to identify relative changes in household sustainability. We show that in the dry region of Dodoma, economic sustainability increased less for adopters of the innovations in comparison to non-adopters between the years 2013 and 2016, with 6 percentage points and 11 percentage points respectively. In contrast, in the humid region, the adoption of innovations increased food security by 14 percentage points compared to 6 percentage points in the case of non-adoption. These results highlight that innovations must fit the context and should not be scaled without prior analysis of multiple impact dimensions as they may trigger significant trade-offs. By moving the focus from field to farm scale, this study contributes to providing a more rigorous assessment of the spillover effects that in-field innovations can have on the overall sustainability of households, which is a prerequisite for the advancement of sustainable intensification of agricultural production in the region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将采用创新与农场可持续性联系起来:坦桑尼亚雨水收集和微量施肥的经验证据
粮食不安全和贫困是坦桑尼亚农民和农村家庭关注的主要问题。在分析中,必须将对作物产量的影响与对整体可持续性及其组成部分的整体看法结合起来,仔细研究提高家庭可持续性的创新方法。雨水收集和微量施肥可以提高粮食安全,尤其是在水资源有限的情况下,但它们也会大大增加劳动力需求以及村庄和流域水资源的可用性和使用。本研究旨在量化雨水收集和微量施肥对坦桑尼亚两个地区(半干旱的多多马和半湿润的莫罗戈罗)家庭的环境、社会和经济可持续性的影响。我们选取并计算了 2013 年和 2016 年 892 户家庭的 40 项可持续性指标,并采用差分倾向得分匹配法来确定家庭可持续性的相对变化。我们发现,在多多马的干旱地区,2013 年至 2016 年期间,采用创新技术的家庭与未采用创新技术的家庭相比,经济可持续性的提高幅度较小,分别为 6 个百分点和 11 个百分点。相比之下,在湿润地区,采用创新技术的粮食安全提高了 14 个百分点,而未采用创新技术的提高了 6 个百分点。这些结果突出表明,创新必须适合具体情况,在未对多个影响维度进行事先分析的情况下,不应扩大创新的规模,因为创新可能会引发重大权衡。通过将重点从田间转移到农场规模,本研究有助于更严格地评估田间创新对家庭整体可持续性的溢出效应,这是在该地区推进农业生产可持续集约化的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
期刊最新文献
The multi-level determinants of international migration aspirations in 25 communities in Africa, Asia and the Middle East Temporary labor mobility to various geographical and sectoral destinations improves rural incomes − Insights from Peru Can solar water kiosks generate sustainable revenue streams for rural water services? Immiserizing growth and the middle-income trap in rural South East Asia: Comparing exclusion and coping mechanisms among farming and fishing communities Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1