The current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Oluwanifemi O. Akintoye, Bukola G. Adu, Michael J. Otorkpa, Oluwatobi O. Olayode, Samuel Fodop, Peace O. Alemede, Ruth K. Enyong, Feziechi C. Anele, Benjamin I. Omoregbee
{"title":"The current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Oluwanifemi O. Akintoye, Bukola G. Adu, Michael J. Otorkpa, Oluwatobi O. Olayode, Samuel Fodop, Peace O. Alemede, Ruth K. Enyong, Feziechi C. Anele, Benjamin I. Omoregbee","doi":"10.1186/s43057-024-00134-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, the utilisation of minimally invasive techniques has become increasingly prevalent. While traditional open-heart procedures still dominate the landscape, a significant portion of cardiac surgeries are now performed minimally invasively. The aim of this study is to provide an insightful overview of the current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa. A comprehensive database search was performed on PubMed, African Journal Online, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify published data reporting on outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa, from inception till June 2024. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines to undergo this study. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and overall mortality. Data were pooled together and analysed using a random effect model for meta-analysis with R software. Out of a total of 2309 articles identified, only fourteen papers met our inclusion criteria following deduplication and screening. The four countries with published research include Egypt, South Africa, Tanzania, and Morocco, with a total sample size of 1357 patients. The meta-analysis of the reported outcomes produced a pooled in-hospital mortality prevalence of 1.18%, while the pooled overall mortality prevalence was 2.23%. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the mini sternotomy and the full sternotomy group. The pooled outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa are comparable to those in other regions. However, there are several socio-economic factors limiting its widespread practice in Africa.","PeriodicalId":501458,"journal":{"name":"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-024-00134-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, the utilisation of minimally invasive techniques has become increasingly prevalent. While traditional open-heart procedures still dominate the landscape, a significant portion of cardiac surgeries are now performed minimally invasively. The aim of this study is to provide an insightful overview of the current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa. A comprehensive database search was performed on PubMed, African Journal Online, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify published data reporting on outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa, from inception till June 2024. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines to undergo this study. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and overall mortality. Data were pooled together and analysed using a random effect model for meta-analysis with R software. Out of a total of 2309 articles identified, only fourteen papers met our inclusion criteria following deduplication and screening. The four countries with published research include Egypt, South Africa, Tanzania, and Morocco, with a total sample size of 1357 patients. The meta-analysis of the reported outcomes produced a pooled in-hospital mortality prevalence of 1.18%, while the pooled overall mortality prevalence was 2.23%. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the mini sternotomy and the full sternotomy group. The pooled outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa are comparable to those in other regions. However, there are several socio-economic factors limiting its widespread practice in Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲微创心脏手术的现状:系统回顾和荟萃分析
在全球范围内,微创技术的应用越来越普遍。虽然传统的开胸手术仍占主导地位,但现在有很大一部分心脏手术是以微创方式进行的。本研究旨在对非洲微创心脏手术的现状进行深入概述。我们在PubMed、African Journal Online、Google Scholar和Scopus上进行了全面的数据库搜索,以确定从开始到2024年6月有关非洲微创心脏手术结果报告的已发表数据。我们采用《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南来开展这项研究。我们关注的主要结果是院内死亡率和总死亡率。我们采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总,并使用 R 软件进行元分析。在已确定的 2309 篇文章中,经过重复筛选,只有 14 篇符合我们的纳入标准。已发表研究论文的四个国家包括埃及、南非、坦桑尼亚和摩洛哥,总样本量为 1357 名患者。通过对报告结果进行荟萃分析,汇总的院内死亡率为 1.18%,而汇总的总体死亡率为 2.23%。微型胸骨切开术组和全胸骨切开术组的结果在统计学上没有明显差异。非洲微创心脏手术的汇总结果与其他地区相当。然而,一些社会经济因素限制了微创心脏手术在非洲的广泛开展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Mechanical mitral valve endurance in children under 2 years A novel approach, AngioVac use in right-sided infective endocarditis: a scoping review The current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sixteen-year outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-center experience Subclinical venous thromboembolism after pulmonary resection for lung cancer: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1