{"title":"Material Choices for Tunnel Dielectric Layer and Gate Blocking Layer for Ferroelectric NAND Applications","authors":"Lance Fernandes;Prasanna Venkatesan Ravindran;Taeyoung Song;Dipjyoti Das;Chinsung Park;Nashrah Afroze;Mengkun Tian;Hang Chen;Winston Chern;Kijoon Kim;Jongho Woo;Suhwan Lim;Kwangsoo Kim;Wanki Kim;Daewon Ha;Shimeng Yu;Suman Datta;Asif Khan","doi":"10.1109/LED.2024.3437239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an experimental study to compare the impacts of different dielectric materials - Al\n<sub>2</sub>\nO\n<sub>3</sub>\n and SiO\n<sub>2</sub>\n used as the tunnel dielectric layer (TDL) and the gate blocking layer (GBL) on the performance of ferroelectric gate stacks for NAND storage applications. We considered the maximum memory window (MW) and the incremental step program pulse (ISPP) slope as the key performance metrics. In a gate stack with TDL, Al\n<sub>2</sub>\nO\n<sub>3</sub>\n gives higher MW and ISPP performance than SiO\n<sub>2</sub>\n. However, in the GBL gate stack, SiO\n<sub>2</sub>\n has a higher MW and ISPP slope than Al\n<sub>2</sub>\nO\n<sub>3</sub>\n. With SiO\n<sub>2</sub>\n GBL, a maximum MW window of 8.3V was achieved, enabling quad-level cell (QLC) capability. We show that for a similar thickness, SiO\n<sub>2</sub>\n as GBL has the better MW performance, and Al\n<sub>2</sub>\nO\n<sub>3</sub>\n as TDL has a better ISPP performance. This study shows that TDL and GBL with appropriate dielectric material can be used as tuning knobs to achieve the desired ISPP and MW performance for ferroelectric NAND applications.","PeriodicalId":13198,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Electron Device Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Electron Device Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10621062/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present an experimental study to compare the impacts of different dielectric materials - Al
2
O
3
and SiO
2
used as the tunnel dielectric layer (TDL) and the gate blocking layer (GBL) on the performance of ferroelectric gate stacks for NAND storage applications. We considered the maximum memory window (MW) and the incremental step program pulse (ISPP) slope as the key performance metrics. In a gate stack with TDL, Al
2
O
3
gives higher MW and ISPP performance than SiO
2
. However, in the GBL gate stack, SiO
2
has a higher MW and ISPP slope than Al
2
O
3
. With SiO
2
GBL, a maximum MW window of 8.3V was achieved, enabling quad-level cell (QLC) capability. We show that for a similar thickness, SiO
2
as GBL has the better MW performance, and Al
2
O
3
as TDL has a better ISPP performance. This study shows that TDL and GBL with appropriate dielectric material can be used as tuning knobs to achieve the desired ISPP and MW performance for ferroelectric NAND applications.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Electron Device Letters publishes original and significant contributions relating to the theory, modeling, design, performance and reliability of electron and ion integrated circuit devices and interconnects, involving insulators, metals, organic materials, micro-plasmas, semiconductors, quantum-effect structures, vacuum devices, and emerging materials with applications in bioelectronics, biomedical electronics, computation, communications, displays, microelectromechanics, imaging, micro-actuators, nanoelectronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, power ICs and micro-sensors.