Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: potential and difficulties

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9
Mohammed Alwaqdani
{"title":"Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: potential and difficulties","authors":"Mohammed Alwaqdani","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigated teachers’ perceptions towards the integration of Artificial Intelligence educational tools (AIED) into their educational practices.Indeed, AI rapidly advances across various fields, including education, and it is essential to understand teachers’ perceptions to effectively harness its potential.The study used a quantitative methodology, employing a questionnaire to collect perspectives from 1101 Saudi teachers across different levels and backgrounds. The research attempted to address two research questions focused on (1) The potential of AI as a tool to enhance teaching practice, and (2) the Difficulties encountered by teachers when utilizing AIED tools. The findings showed many teachers acknowledge AIED’s potential to save time, assist in designing enriching activities, and personalize learning experiences, however, concerns exist regarding the effort required for training, potential job displacement, a lack of creativity and critical thinking, unintended consequences, and trust in AI’s error- free performance. Although teachers have explicit optimism about AIED’s benefits, a cautious stance emerges due to concerns about its impact on educational quality, human touch, and potential risks. These results emphasize the need for targeted professional development, collaborative efforts between educators and policymakers, and ethical considerations to ensure responsible and effective integration of AIED. Understanding teachers’ perspectives is crucial for informed decision-making and fostering a balanced approach that optimizes AIED’s contributions while upholding the principles of effective and inclusive education in the rapidly evolving Saudi educational landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"190 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigated teachers’ perceptions towards the integration of Artificial Intelligence educational tools (AIED) into their educational practices.Indeed, AI rapidly advances across various fields, including education, and it is essential to understand teachers’ perceptions to effectively harness its potential.The study used a quantitative methodology, employing a questionnaire to collect perspectives from 1101 Saudi teachers across different levels and backgrounds. The research attempted to address two research questions focused on (1) The potential of AI as a tool to enhance teaching practice, and (2) the Difficulties encountered by teachers when utilizing AIED tools. The findings showed many teachers acknowledge AIED’s potential to save time, assist in designing enriching activities, and personalize learning experiences, however, concerns exist regarding the effort required for training, potential job displacement, a lack of creativity and critical thinking, unintended consequences, and trust in AI’s error- free performance. Although teachers have explicit optimism about AIED’s benefits, a cautious stance emerges due to concerns about its impact on educational quality, human touch, and potential risks. These results emphasize the need for targeted professional development, collaborative efforts between educators and policymakers, and ethical considerations to ensure responsible and effective integration of AIED. Understanding teachers’ perspectives is crucial for informed decision-making and fostering a balanced approach that optimizes AIED’s contributions while upholding the principles of effective and inclusive education in the rapidly evolving Saudi educational landscape.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查教师对教育领域人工智能工具的看法:潜力与困难
本论文调查了教师对将人工智能教育工具(AIED)融入其教育实践的看法。事实上,人工智能在包括教育在内的各个领域迅速发展,了解教师的看法对有效利用其潜力至关重要。本研究采用定量方法,通过问卷调查收集了 1101 名不同级别和背景的沙特教师的观点。研究试图解决两个研究问题,重点是:(1)人工智能作为一种工具在提高教学实践方面的潜力;(2)教师在使用人工智能教育工具时遇到的困难。研究结果表明,许多教师承认人工智能教育工具在节省时间、协助设计丰富的活动和个性化学习体验等方面具有潜力,但也存在培训所需的努力、潜在的工作替代、缺乏创造性和批判性思维、意外后果以及对人工智能无差错性能的信任等方面的担忧。尽管教师们对人工智能教育的益处持明确的乐观态度,但由于担心其对教育质量的影响、人与人之间的接触以及潜在的风险,教师们还是持谨慎的态度。这些结果强调了有针对性的专业发展、教育工作者和政策制定者之间的合作努力以及道德考量的必要性,以确保负责任和有效地整合人工智能教育。了解教师的观点对于做出明智的决策和培养一种平衡的方法至关重要,这种方法既能优化人工智能与教育发展的贡献,又能在快速发展的沙特教育环境中坚持有效和全纳教育的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1