Does Being an Environmental Citizen Lead to Greater Well-Being? The Self-Determination Theory Approach

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Sage Open Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/21582440241267156
Aivaras Vijaikis, Mykolas Simas Poškus
{"title":"Does Being an Environmental Citizen Lead to Greater Well-Being? The Self-Determination Theory Approach","authors":"Aivaras Vijaikis, Mykolas Simas Poškus","doi":"10.1177/21582440241267156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examine a potential model based on the Self-Determination Theory, which explains how environmental citizenship and connectedness to nature could be associated with subjective well-being through the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. A convenience sample of 172 adolescents from three Lithuanian schools with a mean age of 15.4 years was gathered (40.1% male, 51.7% female, and 8.1% who preferred not to answer). The tested model showed reasonable fit indices: CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.928, NFI = 0.913, RMSEA = 0.104 [0.090–0.119], SRMR = 0.073 and χ<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (98) = 281.532, p &lt; .01, and could explain approximately 41% of the variance of subjective well-being. The results show that pro-environmental actions taken by environmental citizens in the private sphere can have a positive impact on mental health as pro-environmental behavior satisfies basic psychological needs.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241267156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine a potential model based on the Self-Determination Theory, which explains how environmental citizenship and connectedness to nature could be associated with subjective well-being through the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. A convenience sample of 172 adolescents from three Lithuanian schools with a mean age of 15.4 years was gathered (40.1% male, 51.7% female, and 8.1% who preferred not to answer). The tested model showed reasonable fit indices: CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.928, NFI = 0.913, RMSEA = 0.104 [0.090–0.119], SRMR = 0.073 and χ2 (98) = 281.532, p < .01, and could explain approximately 41% of the variance of subjective well-being. The results show that pro-environmental actions taken by environmental citizens in the private sphere can have a positive impact on mental health as pro-environmental behavior satisfies basic psychological needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为环境公民会带来更多福祉吗?自我决定理论方法
在本研究中,我们研究了一个基于自我决定理论的潜在模型,该模型解释了环境公民身份和与自然的联系如何通过满足基本心理需求与主观幸福感相关联。研究人员对来自立陶宛三所学校的 172 名青少年进行了方便抽样调查,这些青少年的平均年龄为 15.4 岁(40.1% 为男性,51.7% 为女性,8.1% 的青少年不愿回答问题)。测试模型显示出合理的拟合指数:CFI = 0.941,TLI = 0.928,NFI = 0.913,RMSEA = 0.104 [0.090-0.119],SRMR = 0.073,χ2 (98) = 281.532,p < .01,可以解释主观幸福感约 41% 的变异。结果表明,环保公民在私人领域采取的亲环境行为会对心理健康产生积极影响,因为亲环境行为满足了基本的心理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An exploration of positive leisure activities in Batswana families An Analysis of the Cognitive Demands of Senior High School English as a Foreign Language Textbooks in China Social Inequalities in Loneliness: Disentangling the Contributions of Education, Income, and Occupation What Makes an International Student in the U.S. Have Less Psychological Distress? Development and Validation of the Family Involvement in Graduate School (FIGS) Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1