Populism’s Influence on News Content: Polarization, Political Parallelism, and Journalistic Professionalism in Rafael Correa’s Ecuador

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Sage Open Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/21582440241266973
Manel Palos Pons
{"title":"Populism’s Influence on News Content: Polarization, Political Parallelism, and Journalistic Professionalism in Rafael Correa’s Ecuador","authors":"Manel Palos Pons","doi":"10.1177/21582440241266973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates how populism in power influenced news media in Ecuador during leftist president Rafael Correa’s presidency (2007–2017). Correa’s administration triggered a bold media reform in Ecuador challenging traditional media and promising media democratization, but his government received sharp denunciations from press freedom and media organizations which considered Ecuador as a “not free” country, especially after the passing of a Communication Law in 2013 that regulated media extensively. Through content analysis of news and opinion pieces published in 2005, 2006, 2015, 2016, and 2018 by Ecuador’s main legacy newspapers, El Comercio and El Universo, different legal and political contexts are examined. The main observations suggest an increase in polarization and improvements in journalistic professionalism, two results consistent and divergent to mainstream academic approaches and public discussions about populism. This contradictory situation may be explained by the emergence of a new political parallelism, absent before Correa came to power, which combines consistent stances based on the rejection of Correa’s leadership, with an improvement in professional practices, especially when Correa was in power. These results, and novel approach adopting a detailed content analysis to explore the relationship between populism and journalism in a Latin American media system, may contribute to a better understanding of the influence of populism on news media. This study calls for more comparative and longitudinal analyses in different media systems and populist experiences, focused on the connection of professional practices and political positioning, with or without populist actors in power.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates how populism in power influenced news media in Ecuador during leftist president Rafael Correa’s presidency (2007–2017). Correa’s administration triggered a bold media reform in Ecuador challenging traditional media and promising media democratization, but his government received sharp denunciations from press freedom and media organizations which considered Ecuador as a “not free” country, especially after the passing of a Communication Law in 2013 that regulated media extensively. Through content analysis of news and opinion pieces published in 2005, 2006, 2015, 2016, and 2018 by Ecuador’s main legacy newspapers, El Comercio and El Universo, different legal and political contexts are examined. The main observations suggest an increase in polarization and improvements in journalistic professionalism, two results consistent and divergent to mainstream academic approaches and public discussions about populism. This contradictory situation may be explained by the emergence of a new political parallelism, absent before Correa came to power, which combines consistent stances based on the rejection of Correa’s leadership, with an improvement in professional practices, especially when Correa was in power. These results, and novel approach adopting a detailed content analysis to explore the relationship between populism and journalism in a Latin American media system, may contribute to a better understanding of the influence of populism on news media. This study calls for more comparative and longitudinal analyses in different media systems and populist experiences, focused on the connection of professional practices and political positioning, with or without populist actors in power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义对新闻内容的影响:拉斐尔-科雷亚领导的厄瓜多尔的两极分化、政治平行和新闻专业主义
本文探讨了在左派总统拉斐尔-科雷亚担任总统期间(2007-2017 年),民粹主义如何影响厄瓜多尔的新闻媒体。科雷亚执政期间,厄瓜多尔掀起了一场大胆的媒体改革,挑战传统媒体并承诺实现媒体民主化,但他的政府却遭到了新闻自由和媒体组织的强烈谴责,这些组织认为厄瓜多尔是一个 "不自由 "的国家,尤其是在 2013 年通过《通信法》对媒体进行广泛监管之后。通过对厄瓜多尔主要传统报纸《商报》(El Comercio)和《宇宙报》(El Universo)在 2005、2006、2015、2016 和 2018 年发表的新闻和评论文章进行内容分析,研究了不同的法律和政治背景。主要观察结果表明,两极分化加剧,新闻专业性提高,这两个结果与主流学术方法和关于民粹主义的公共讨论既一致又不同。这种矛盾的局面可以解释为一种新的政治平行主义的出现,这种平行主义在科雷亚执政之前是不存在的,它将基于反对科雷亚领导的一贯立场与专业实践的改进结合在一起,尤其是在科雷亚执政时。这些结果以及采用详细内容分析来探讨拉美媒体系统中民粹主义与新闻业之间关系的新方法,可能有助于更好地理解民粹主义对新闻媒体的影响。本研究呼吁对不同的媒体系统和民粹主义经历进行更多的比较和纵向分析,重点关注专业实践与政治定位之间的联系,无论民粹主义行为者是否掌权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An exploration of positive leisure activities in Batswana families An Analysis of the Cognitive Demands of Senior High School English as a Foreign Language Textbooks in China Social Inequalities in Loneliness: Disentangling the Contributions of Education, Income, and Occupation What Makes an International Student in the U.S. Have Less Psychological Distress? Development and Validation of the Family Involvement in Graduate School (FIGS) Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1