Antenatal corticosteroids for pregnant women at risk of preterm labor in low- and middle-income countries: utilization and facility readiness

Wen-Chien Yang, Catherine Arsenault, Victoria Y. Fan, Hannah H. Leslie, Fouzia Farooq, Andrea B. Pembe, Theodros Getachew, Emily R. Smith
{"title":"Antenatal corticosteroids for pregnant women at risk of preterm labor in low- and middle-income countries: utilization and facility readiness","authors":"Wen-Chien Yang, Catherine Arsenault, Victoria Y. Fan, Hannah H. Leslie, Fouzia Farooq, Andrea B. Pembe, Theodros Getachew, Emily R. Smith","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.31.24310863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) use among pregnant women with a high likelihood of preterm labor improves newborn survival. ACS adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. Giving ACS in inadequately equipped settings could be harmful to mothers and newborns. Thus, health facilities have to demontrate readiness to administer ACS. However, the degree to which health systems are ready is unknown.\nObjective We assessed facility readiness to administer ACS based on the 2022 WHO recommendations on ACS use and ACS utilization.\nMethods\nThe study used Service Provision Assessment surveys administered between 2013 and 2022 in nine LMICs. The primary outcome was whether facilities had ever provided ACS. We also assessed injectable corticosteroid (dexamethasone or betamethasone) availability and facility readiness to administer ACS. We used a total of 35 indicators, grouped into four readiness categories based on the WHO recommendations, to measure facility readiness.\nFindings Across eight countries with comparable sampling strategies, only 10.7% (median, range 6.7% - 35.2%) of facilities had ever provided ACS; one-fourth (median 25.3%, range 4.6% - 61.5%) of facilities had injectable corticosteroids available at the time of the survey; overall readiness indices were low ranging from 8.1% for Bangladesh to 32.9% for Senegal. Across four readiness categories, the readiness index was the lowest for criterion 1 (ability to assess gestational age accurately and identify a high likelihood of preterm birth) (7.3%), followed by criterion 2 (ability to identify maternal infections) (24.8%), criterion 4 (ability to provide adequate preterm care) (31.3%), and criterion 3 (ability to provide adequate childbirth care) (32.9%).\nConclusion\nWe proposed a strategy for measuring facility readiness to implement one of the most effective interventions to improve neonatal survival. Countries should operationalize readiness measurement, improve facilities readiness to deliver this life-saving intervention, and encourage ACS uptake by targeting facilities that are well-equipped.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.24310863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) use among pregnant women with a high likelihood of preterm labor improves newborn survival. ACS adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. Giving ACS in inadequately equipped settings could be harmful to mothers and newborns. Thus, health facilities have to demontrate readiness to administer ACS. However, the degree to which health systems are ready is unknown. Objective We assessed facility readiness to administer ACS based on the 2022 WHO recommendations on ACS use and ACS utilization. Methods The study used Service Provision Assessment surveys administered between 2013 and 2022 in nine LMICs. The primary outcome was whether facilities had ever provided ACS. We also assessed injectable corticosteroid (dexamethasone or betamethasone) availability and facility readiness to administer ACS. We used a total of 35 indicators, grouped into four readiness categories based on the WHO recommendations, to measure facility readiness. Findings Across eight countries with comparable sampling strategies, only 10.7% (median, range 6.7% - 35.2%) of facilities had ever provided ACS; one-fourth (median 25.3%, range 4.6% - 61.5%) of facilities had injectable corticosteroids available at the time of the survey; overall readiness indices were low ranging from 8.1% for Bangladesh to 32.9% for Senegal. Across four readiness categories, the readiness index was the lowest for criterion 1 (ability to assess gestational age accurately and identify a high likelihood of preterm birth) (7.3%), followed by criterion 2 (ability to identify maternal infections) (24.8%), criterion 4 (ability to provide adequate preterm care) (31.3%), and criterion 3 (ability to provide adequate childbirth care) (32.9%). Conclusion We proposed a strategy for measuring facility readiness to implement one of the most effective interventions to improve neonatal survival. Countries should operationalize readiness measurement, improve facilities readiness to deliver this life-saving intervention, and encourage ACS uptake by targeting facilities that are well-equipped.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家为有早产风险的孕妇提供产前皮质类固醇:使用情况和设施准备情况
背景 在极有可能早产的孕妇中使用产前皮质类固醇(ACS)可提高新生儿存活率。中低收入国家(LMICs)采用产前皮质类固醇的情况仍然有限。在设备不足的情况下给予 ACS 可能会对母亲和新生儿造成伤害。因此,医疗机构必须证明已做好实施 ACS 的准备。我们根据 2022 年世界卫生组织关于 ACS 使用和 ACS 利用率的建议,评估了医疗机构实施 ACS 的准备情况。主要结果是医疗机构是否提供过ACS。我们还评估了注射用皮质类固醇(地塞米松或倍他米松)的可用性以及医疗机构实施ACS的准备情况。我们共使用了 35 项指标来衡量医疗机构的准备程度,这些指标根据世界卫生组织的建议分为四个准备程度类别。 调查结果 在抽样策略相似的八个国家中,只有 10.7%(中位数,范围 6.7% - 35.2%)的医疗机构曾经提供过 ACS;四分之一(中位数 25.3%,范围 4.6% - 61.5%)的医疗机构在调查时有可注射的皮质类固醇;总体准备程度指数较低,从孟加拉国的 8.1% 到塞内加尔的 32.9%。在四个准备就绪类别中,标准 1(准确评估胎龄和识别早产可能性高的能力)的准备就绪指数最低(7.3%),其次是标准 2(识别产妇感染的能力)(24.8%)、标准 4(提供充分的早产儿护理的能力)(31.3%)和标准 3(提供充分的分娩护理的能力)(32.9%)。各国应将准备度测量付诸实践,提高医疗机构提供这一救生干预措施的准备度,并通过针对设备齐全的医疗机构鼓励其采用 ACS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1