Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) Use for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Multicenter Study Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.3390/toxins16080340
María Jesús Antón, Montserrat Molina, José Gabriel Pérez, Santiago Pina, Noemí Tapiador, Beatriz De La Calle, Mónica Martínez, Paula Ortega, María Belén Ruspaggiari, Consuelo Tudela, Marta Conejo, Pedro Leno, Marta López, Carmen Marhuenda, Carlos Arias-Cabrales, Pascal Maisonobe, Alberto Herrera, Ernesto Candau
{"title":"Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) Use for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Multicenter Study Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning","authors":"María Jesús Antón, Montserrat Molina, José Gabriel Pérez, Santiago Pina, Noemí Tapiador, Beatriz De La Calle, Mónica Martínez, Paula Ortega, María Belén Ruspaggiari, Consuelo Tudela, Marta Conejo, Pedro Leno, Marta López, Carmen Marhuenda, Carlos Arias-Cabrales, Pascal Maisonobe, Alberto Herrera, Ernesto Candau","doi":"10.3390/toxins16080340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a multicenter and retrospective study to describe the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) to treat post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Data were extracted from free-text in electronic health records (EHRs) in five Spanish hospitals. We included adults diagnosed with PSS between January 2015 and December 2019, stratified into BoNT-A-treated and untreated groups. We used EHRead® technology, which incorporates natural language processing and machine learning, as well as SNOMED CT terminology. We analyzed demographic data, stroke characteristics, BoNT-A use patterns, and other treatments. We reviewed the EHRs of 1,233,929 patients and identified 2190 people with PSS with a median age of 69 years; in total, 52.1% were men, 70.7% had cardiovascular risk factors, and 63.2% had suffered an ischemic stroke. Among the PSS patients, 25.5% received BoNT-A at least once. The median time from stroke to spasticity onset was 205 days, and the time from stroke to the first BoNT-A injection was 364 days. The primary goal of BoNT-A treatment was pain control. Among the study cohort, rehabilitation was the most common non-pharmacological treatment (95.5%). Only 3.3% had recorded monitoring scales. In conclusion, a quarter of patients with PSS received BoNT-A mainly for pain relief, typically one year after the stroke. Early treatment, disease monitoring, and better data documentation in EHRs are crucial to improve PSS patients’ care.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16080340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a multicenter and retrospective study to describe the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) to treat post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Data were extracted from free-text in electronic health records (EHRs) in five Spanish hospitals. We included adults diagnosed with PSS between January 2015 and December 2019, stratified into BoNT-A-treated and untreated groups. We used EHRead® technology, which incorporates natural language processing and machine learning, as well as SNOMED CT terminology. We analyzed demographic data, stroke characteristics, BoNT-A use patterns, and other treatments. We reviewed the EHRs of 1,233,929 patients and identified 2190 people with PSS with a median age of 69 years; in total, 52.1% were men, 70.7% had cardiovascular risk factors, and 63.2% had suffered an ischemic stroke. Among the PSS patients, 25.5% received BoNT-A at least once. The median time from stroke to spasticity onset was 205 days, and the time from stroke to the first BoNT-A injection was 364 days. The primary goal of BoNT-A treatment was pain control. Among the study cohort, rehabilitation was the most common non-pharmacological treatment (95.5%). Only 3.3% had recorded monitoring scales. In conclusion, a quarter of patients with PSS received BoNT-A mainly for pain relief, typically one year after the stroke. Early treatment, disease monitoring, and better data documentation in EHRs are crucial to improve PSS patients’ care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 A 型肉毒杆菌毒素 (BoNT-A) 治疗中风后痉挛:使用自然语言处理和机器学习的多中心研究
我们开展了一项多中心回顾性研究,以描述使用 A 型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)治疗中风后痉挛(PSS)的情况。研究人员从西班牙五家医院的电子病历(EHR)中提取了自由文本数据。我们纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间确诊为 PSS 的成人,并将其分为 BoNT-A 治疗组和未治疗组。我们使用了 EHRead® 技术,该技术结合了自然语言处理和机器学习以及 SNOMED CT 术语。我们分析了人口统计学数据、中风特征、BoNT-A 使用模式和其他治疗方法。我们查阅了 1,233,929 位患者的电子病历,确定了 2190 位 PSS 患者,中位年龄为 69 岁;其中 52.1% 为男性,70.7% 有心血管风险因素,63.2% 曾患缺血性中风。在 PSS 患者中,25.5% 至少接受过一次 BoNT-A。从中风到痉挛发作的中位时间为 205 天,从中风到首次注射 BoNT-A 的时间为 364 天。BoNT-A 治疗的主要目标是控制疼痛。在研究队列中,康复是最常见的非药物治疗方法(95.5%)。只有 3.3% 的患者记录了监测量表。总之,四分之一的 PSS 患者接受 BoNT-A 治疗的主要目的是缓解疼痛,通常是在中风一年后。早期治疗、疾病监测和更好的电子病历数据记录对改善 PSS 患者的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1