Kish grid vs birthday procedures: survey refusal rates by the type of within-household selection procedure in the European Social Survey

Piotr Jabkowski, Piotr Cichocki, Marta Kołczyńska
{"title":"Kish grid vs birthday procedures: survey refusal rates by the type of within-household selection procedure in the European Social Survey","authors":"Piotr Jabkowski, Piotr Cichocki, Marta Kołczyńska","doi":"10.1177/07591063241258087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two approaches to within-household selection of target respondents dominate cross-national surveys of the general population: the Kish grid and birthday procedures. The Kish grid is a rigorous probabilistic approach expected to produce higher-quality samples. However, its requirement to construct a complete household register is intrusive and may increase refusals. Conversely, birthday procedures, which do not require a household roster, may result in fewer refusals at the cost of lower sample quality. Our paper examines the impact of within-household selection procedures on refusal rates based on a methodological inventory of 120 national surveys from nine rounds of the European Social Survey (2002–2018). Controlling for the implementation of incentives for respondents, the experience of the interviewer teams and the country’s level of economic development, we find that surveys using the Kish grid have higher refusal rates before or during the selection process compared to surveys involving birthday procedures, suggesting that the use of the Kish grid is perceived as more intrusive for household members than birthday procedures. However, we find no significant difference between the two selection procedures regarding respondent refusals and total refusals.","PeriodicalId":517384,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063241258087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two approaches to within-household selection of target respondents dominate cross-national surveys of the general population: the Kish grid and birthday procedures. The Kish grid is a rigorous probabilistic approach expected to produce higher-quality samples. However, its requirement to construct a complete household register is intrusive and may increase refusals. Conversely, birthday procedures, which do not require a household roster, may result in fewer refusals at the cost of lower sample quality. Our paper examines the impact of within-household selection procedures on refusal rates based on a methodological inventory of 120 national surveys from nine rounds of the European Social Survey (2002–2018). Controlling for the implementation of incentives for respondents, the experience of the interviewer teams and the country’s level of economic development, we find that surveys using the Kish grid have higher refusal rates before or during the selection process compared to surveys involving birthday procedures, suggesting that the use of the Kish grid is perceived as more intrusive for household members than birthday procedures. However, we find no significant difference between the two selection procedures regarding respondent refusals and total refusals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基什网格与生日程序:欧洲社会调查中按家庭内部选择程序类型划分的调查拒绝率
在针对普通人群的跨国调查中,主要有两种在家庭内部选择目标受访者的方法:基什网格和生日程序。基什网格是一种严格的概率方法,预计能产生更高质量的样本。然而,它要求建立完整的住户登记册,具有一定的侵入性,可能会增加拒绝调查的人数。相反,生日程序不需要家庭花名册,可能会以降低样本质量为代价减少拒绝样本的数量。我们的论文基于九轮欧洲社会调查(2002-2018 年)中 120 个国家调查的方法清单,研究了户内选择程序对拒绝率的影响。在控制了对受访者的激励措施、访谈员团队的经验和国家的经济发展水平后,我们发现,与涉及生日程序的调查相比,使用基什网格的调查在选择过程之前或过程中的拒绝率更高,这表明使用基什网格比生日程序对家庭成员的侵扰性更强。然而,我们发现两种遴选程序在受访者拒绝率和总拒绝率方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing in the BMS. A long process, but not without reason The structure of an uncertain world: Combining sequences classification and career life histories to identify narrative schemas in the careers of financial journalists Publier dans le BMS. Une longue procédure, mais pas sans raison Battles and crossings of methods: Sequence analysis and geometric data analysis for the study of professional careers Une collaboration entre sociologues et mathématiciennes : entretiens (auto)biographiques, ethos mathématicien et carrières féminines au Chili
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1