Mobile applications on app stores for deprescribing: A scoping review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16191
Lina Okati, Sarita Lo, Danijela Gnjidic, Susan Jiayu Li, Janani Thillainadesan
{"title":"Mobile applications on app stores for deprescribing: A scoping review.","authors":"Lina Okati, Sarita Lo, Danijela Gnjidic, Susan Jiayu Li, Janani Thillainadesan","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deprescribing is an evidence-based intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication use. Yet its implementation faces barriers including inadequate resources, training and time. Mobile applications (apps) on app stores could address some barriers by offering educational content and interactive features for medication assessment and deprescribing guidance. A scoping review was undertaken to examine existing deprescribing apps, identifying features including interactive and artificial intelligence (AI) elements. A comprehensive search was conducted in August 2023 to identify mobile apps with deprescribing content within the Apple and Google Play Stores. The apps found were screened for inclusion, and data on their features were extracted. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mobile App Rating Scale. Six deprescribing-related apps were identified: the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria 2023, Dementia Training Australia Medications, Evidence-Based Medicine Guide, Information Assessment Method Medical Guidelines, MedGPT-Medical AI App, and Polypharmacy: Manage Medicines. These apps focused primarily on educating both patients/carers and healthcare professionals about deprescribing. Amongst them, two apps included interactive features, with one incorporating AI technology. While these features allowed for search queries and input of patient-level details, the apps provided limited personalised deprescribing advice. In terms of quality, the apps scored highly on functionality and information, and poorly on engagement and aesthetics. This review found deprescribing apps, despite being educational, have limitations in personalization and user engagement. Future research should prioritize evaluating their feasibility and user experience in clinical settings, and further explore how AI and interactivity could enhance the usefulness of these apps for deprescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"55-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deprescribing is an evidence-based intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication use. Yet its implementation faces barriers including inadequate resources, training and time. Mobile applications (apps) on app stores could address some barriers by offering educational content and interactive features for medication assessment and deprescribing guidance. A scoping review was undertaken to examine existing deprescribing apps, identifying features including interactive and artificial intelligence (AI) elements. A comprehensive search was conducted in August 2023 to identify mobile apps with deprescribing content within the Apple and Google Play Stores. The apps found were screened for inclusion, and data on their features were extracted. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mobile App Rating Scale. Six deprescribing-related apps were identified: the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria 2023, Dementia Training Australia Medications, Evidence-Based Medicine Guide, Information Assessment Method Medical Guidelines, MedGPT-Medical AI App, and Polypharmacy: Manage Medicines. These apps focused primarily on educating both patients/carers and healthcare professionals about deprescribing. Amongst them, two apps included interactive features, with one incorporating AI technology. While these features allowed for search queries and input of patient-level details, the apps provided limited personalised deprescribing advice. In terms of quality, the apps scored highly on functionality and information, and poorly on engagement and aesthetics. This review found deprescribing apps, despite being educational, have limitations in personalization and user engagement. Future research should prioritize evaluating their feasibility and user experience in clinical settings, and further explore how AI and interactivity could enhance the usefulness of these apps for deprescribing practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用程序商店中用于取消处方的移动应用程序:范围综述。
去处方化是一项以证据为基础的干预措施,旨在减少潜在的不当用药。然而,其实施却面临着资源、培训和时间不足等障碍。应用程序商店中的移动应用程序(App)可以通过提供教育内容和互动功能来进行用药评估和处方指导,从而解决一些障碍。我们对现有的取消处方应用程序进行了范围审查,确定了包括互动和人工智能(AI)元素在内的功能。我们于 2023 年 8 月进行了一次全面搜索,以确定苹果和谷歌应用商店中包含处方指导内容的移动应用程序。对找到的应用程序进行了筛选,并提取了有关其功能的数据。采用移动应用评级量表进行质量评估。最终确定了六款与去处方相关的应用程序:美国老年医学会《比尔斯标准 2023》、《澳大利亚痴呆症药物培训》、《循证医学指南》、《信息评估法医疗指南》、《MedGPT-医疗 AI 应用程序》和《多药联用》:药物管理》。这些应用程序主要侧重于向患者/护理人员和医护人员提供有关去处方化的教育。其中,两款应用具有互动功能,一款应用采用了人工智能技术。虽然这些功能允许搜索查询和输入病人的详细资料,但这些应用程序提供的个性化处方建议有限。就质量而言,这些应用程序在功能性和信息方面得分较高,而在参与性和美观方面得分较低。本综述发现,尽管去药方应用程序具有教育意义,但在个性化和用户参与方面存在局限性。未来的研究应优先评估这些应用在临床环境中的可行性和用户体验,并进一步探索人工智能和交互性如何提高这些应用在处方实践中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials. Frailty in clinical drug trials: Frailty assessments, subgroup analyses and outcomes. Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people. Mobile applications on app stores for deprescribing: A scoping review. The effects of diuretic deprescribing in adult patients: A systematic review to inform an evidence-based diuretic deprescribing guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1