Impact of body surface area on efficacy and safety in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib as a first-line treatment

{"title":"Impact of body surface area on efficacy and safety in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib as a first-line treatment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m<sup>2</sup>. There were 44 patients in the BSA &lt; 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA &lt; 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, <em>p</em> = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA &lt; 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, <em>p</em> = 0.869).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA&lt;1.5 group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000480/pdfft?md5=9618c1dc15ff3738502bc6dd4ff016f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000480-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs).

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib.

Results

The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m2. There were 44 patients in the BSA < 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA < 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA < 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, p = 0.869).

Conclusion

Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA<1.5 group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体表面积对接受奥希替尼一线治疗的表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌患者疗效和安全性的影响
背景IV期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性肺癌最推荐的治疗方法是奥希替尼单药治疗。无论体表面积(BSA)如何,奥希替尼的剂量都固定为80毫克/天,但有些患者会因不良反应(AEs)而停药或减量:我们对98例EGFR突变阳性的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了80毫克奥希替尼作为初始治疗。我们研究了BSA对奥希替尼疗效和安全性的影响:我们利用接收器操作特征曲线估算了BSA的临界值,并将其确定为1.5 m2。BSA<1.5组有44名患者,BSA≥1.5组有54名患者。两组的 AEs(≥3 级或以上的血液学毒性和≥3 级的非血液学毒性)发生率无明显差异。然而,与 BSA ≥ 1.5 组相比,BSA < 1.5 组因 AE 而减少剂量的发生率明显更高(16 例患者对 5 例患者,P = 0.003)。主要原因是疲劳、厌食、腹泻和肝功能紊乱。中位无进展生存期(PFS)无明显差异(BSA<1.5组16.9个月 vs BSA≥1.5组18.1个月,p = 0.869):结论:BSA的差异会影响奥希替尼的最佳剂量。结论:BSA的差异会影响奥希替尼的最佳剂量,但奥希替尼治疗的PFS不受BSA的影响。因此,在使用奥希替尼作为 EGFR 突变 NSCLC 患者的初始治疗时,应考虑减少剂量以控制 AEs,尤其是在 BSA 较低的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and pathological differences between early- and late-onset colorectal cancer and determinants of one-year all-cause mortality among advanced-stage patients: a retrospective cohort study in Medellín, Colombia A case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pregnancy with cervical cancer (IB3) Pregnancy-related breast cancer: 14-year experience in a tertiary institution in Hong Kong Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) clone 22C3 expression in resected colorectal cancer as companion diagnostics for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A comparison study and inter-rater agreement evaluation across proposed cut-offs and predictive (TPS, CPS and IC) scores Tumor circulating biomarkers in colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1