{"title":"\"Evaluating Current Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges in Colorectal Cancer: Strategies for improving care and outcomes in Georgia\".","authors":"Saba Kopadze, Ivane Kiladze","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An initial analysis of population-based cancer survival data from Georgia revealed lower CRC survival rates compared to high-income countries. We conducted the study to address this issue and propose strategies for enhancing CRC care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed CRC statistics, reviewed screening programs, and examined published CRC research in Georgia. Finally, we surveyed 16 oncologists from major institutions all over the country to assess molecular testing, treatment standards, and access to modern medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite CRC screening being available in Georgia, late diagnoses persist, with over a 1/3 of cases presenting with acute intestinal obstruction. As a result, 65 % of CRC patients are diagnosed at locally advanced or metastatic stages. All 16 oncologists reported limited molecular testing due to costs, with 13 not routinely performing MSI/MMR and NRAS/KRAS/BRAF testing. Consequently, only 15 % of patients receive anti-EGFR therapy. Oxaliplatin-based therapy is almost universally used for metastatic CRC as the first-line treatment. No CRC clinical trials have been conducted in Georgia over the past three years. Treatment for locally advanced rectalcancer typically includes chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, with notable variation in multidisciplinary team meeting practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study provides several practical recommendations: it is crucial to promote CRC screening programs, enhance access to modern treatment options, and standardize national diagnostic/treatment protocols. There is an urgent need for more clinical trials to increase access to modern therapeutics, as well as to strengthen MDT meetings. These measures are expected to improve CRC care with a further reduction in CRC mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"42 ","pages":"100866"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: An initial analysis of population-based cancer survival data from Georgia revealed lower CRC survival rates compared to high-income countries. We conducted the study to address this issue and propose strategies for enhancing CRC care.
Patients and methods: We analyzed CRC statistics, reviewed screening programs, and examined published CRC research in Georgia. Finally, we surveyed 16 oncologists from major institutions all over the country to assess molecular testing, treatment standards, and access to modern medications.
Results: Despite CRC screening being available in Georgia, late diagnoses persist, with over a 1/3 of cases presenting with acute intestinal obstruction. As a result, 65 % of CRC patients are diagnosed at locally advanced or metastatic stages. All 16 oncologists reported limited molecular testing due to costs, with 13 not routinely performing MSI/MMR and NRAS/KRAS/BRAF testing. Consequently, only 15 % of patients receive anti-EGFR therapy. Oxaliplatin-based therapy is almost universally used for metastatic CRC as the first-line treatment. No CRC clinical trials have been conducted in Georgia over the past three years. Treatment for locally advanced rectalcancer typically includes chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, with notable variation in multidisciplinary team meeting practices.
Conclusions: Study provides several practical recommendations: it is crucial to promote CRC screening programs, enhance access to modern treatment options, and standardize national diagnostic/treatment protocols. There is an urgent need for more clinical trials to increase access to modern therapeutics, as well as to strengthen MDT meetings. These measures are expected to improve CRC care with a further reduction in CRC mortality rates.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.