Follicular neoplasms with nuclear atypia versus other types of atypia: Should follicular neoplasms be stratified according to the presence of nuclear atypia?

Abstract

Background: The third edition of The Bethesda System (TBS) subclassifies the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category on the basis of the presence of nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear). This approach is supported by studies showing significant differences in the risk of malignancy (ROM) between AUS-Nuclear and those without (AUS-Other). Although aspirates of follicular neoplasms (FNs) are characterized by marked architectural atypia, TBS recognizes the infrequent occurrence of FNs with mild nuclear atypia (FN-Nuclear). Furthermore, limited studies have shown significant differences in ROM between FN-Nuclear and those without (FN-Other). This study explored potential differences in ROM, molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM), and molecular alterations between FN-Nuclear and FN-Other.

Methods: A retrospective database search identified 93 FN aspirates. Cytology slides, molecular reports, and histologic follow-ups were reviewed. Both groups' benign call rate (BCR), positive call rate (PCR), MDROM, and ROM were computed and compared.

Results: Eighty-six percent of aspirates (80 of 93) comprised FN-Other, whereas 14% (13 of 93) were FN-Nuclear. The BCR and PCR for FN-Other were 51% and 49%, respectively. In contrast, they were 23% and 77% for FN-Nuclear, respectively. The MDROM significantly differed between FN-Other (30%) and FN-Nuclear (56%) (p < .05). HRAS mutation was the most common molecular alteration in FN-Nuclear, whereas mutations in NRAS/KRAS and copy number alterations were more common in FN-Other. The ROM1/ROM2 in FN-Other and FN-Nuclear were 16%/31% and 54%/88%, respectively.

Conclusions: These results reveal that FN-Nuclear exhibits significantly higher MDROM and ROM than FN-Other, which provides support for a subclassification scheme for FNs based on the presence of nuclear atypia.