首页 > 最新文献

Cancer Cytopathology最新文献

英文 中文
Utility and performance of cell blocks in cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Experience at two teaching hospitals. 脑脊液细胞学中细胞块的用途和性能:两家教学医院的经验。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22836
Hyeji Yoon, Constance V Chen, Vimal Krishnan, Jill Grochowski, Gioia Iezza, Poonam Vohra, Ronald Balassanian, Nancy Y Greenland

Background: Cytology cell blocks (CBs) are not routinely made for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. The goal of this study was to identify when CSF CB preparation improves diagnostic performance.

Materials and methods: Under institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of CSF cytology cases was conducted at a tertiary university-based hospital and an affiliated county hospital. Patient history, CSF volume, final diagnosis, use of stains, and whether the CB was contributory was determined from the cytopathology report. CSF nucleated cell count data was obtained from the medical record.

Results: A total of 69 CSF specimens with CBs from January 2006 to March 2023 were identified from 61 patients. The median CSF volume was 8 mL (interquartile range, 4-13 mL; range, 1-800 mL), with immunohistochemical stains performed on 29 (42%) cases. Per cytology report, CB was contributory in 23 cases (33%), not contributory in 34 cases (49%), and not discussed in 12 cases (17%). The median volume was 8 mL for cases in which CB was contributory, not contributory, or not discussed. There was no difference in average nucleated cell counts between cases in which CB was contributory versus not contributory (73.9 vs. 40.0, p = .175).

Conclusions: CBs for CSF samples were contributory in a subset (33%) of cases. The authors were unable to identify any specific pre-analytic factors, including specimen volume and average nucleated cell counts, for cases in which CB was contributory. Further evaluation is needed to identify if there are scenarios in which CSF CBs should be routinely prepared.

背景:细胞学细胞块(CB)并非脑脊液(CSF)标本的常规制备方法。本研究的目的是确定 CSF CB 制备何时可提高诊断效果:经机构审查委员会批准,在一家大学附属三级医院和一家附属县医院对 CSF 细胞学病例进行了回顾性审查。根据细胞病理学报告确定患者病史、CSF 容量、最终诊断、染色剂的使用以及 CB 是否起作用。CSF 有核细胞计数数据来自病历:结果:从 2006 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月,共从 61 名患者的 69 份 CSF 标本中发现了 CB。中位 CSF 容量为 8 mL(四分位间范围为 4-13 mL;范围为 1-800 mL),其中 29 例(42%)进行了免疫组化染色。根据细胞学报告,23 例(33%)为 CB 促成因素,34 例(49%)为非促成因素,12 例(17%)不予讨论。在促成、未促成或未讨论 CB 的病例中,中位体积为 8 毫升。有助于 CB 和不有助于 CB 的病例的平均有核细胞计数没有差异(73.9 vs. 40.0,p = .175):CSF 样本的 CBs 在部分病例(33%)中起作用。作者无法确定任何特定的分析前因素,包括标本量和平均有核细胞计数。需要进行进一步评估,以确定是否存在应常规制备 CSF CB 的情况。
{"title":"Utility and performance of cell blocks in cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Experience at two teaching hospitals.","authors":"Hyeji Yoon, Constance V Chen, Vimal Krishnan, Jill Grochowski, Gioia Iezza, Poonam Vohra, Ronald Balassanian, Nancy Y Greenland","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22836","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncy.22836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytology cell blocks (CBs) are not routinely made for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. The goal of this study was to identify when CSF CB preparation improves diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Under institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of CSF cytology cases was conducted at a tertiary university-based hospital and an affiliated county hospital. Patient history, CSF volume, final diagnosis, use of stains, and whether the CB was contributory was determined from the cytopathology report. CSF nucleated cell count data was obtained from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 CSF specimens with CBs from January 2006 to March 2023 were identified from 61 patients. The median CSF volume was 8 mL (interquartile range, 4-13 mL; range, 1-800 mL), with immunohistochemical stains performed on 29 (42%) cases. Per cytology report, CB was contributory in 23 cases (33%), not contributory in 34 cases (49%), and not discussed in 12 cases (17%). The median volume was 8 mL for cases in which CB was contributory, not contributory, or not discussed. There was no difference in average nucleated cell counts between cases in which CB was contributory versus not contributory (73.9 vs. 40.0, p = .175).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBs for CSF samples were contributory in a subset (33%) of cases. The authors were unable to identify any specific pre-analytic factors, including specimen volume and average nucleated cell counts, for cases in which CB was contributory. Further evaluation is needed to identify if there are scenarios in which CSF CBs should be routinely prepared.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytomorphologic and molecular characterization of spindle cell carcinoid tumors of the lung. 肺部纺锤形细胞类癌的细胞形态学和分子特征。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22886
Rachelle P Mendoza, Emily Symes, Peng Wang, Cole Miller, Stephanie C Thompson, Tatjana Antic, Anna Biernacka

Background: Spindle cell carcinoid tumor (SCCT) is a rare variant of lung carcinoid tumor consisting predominantly or exclusively of spindle cells. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to date investigating the molecular characteristics of SCCTs.

Methods: Eighty-five carcinoid tumors initially diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration over a period of 10 years were reviewed. The final diagnostic classification was based on resection specimens. Six SCCTs were identified and characterized based on cytomorphology, and immunohistochemical and molecular features.

Results: Most patients with SCCT were Caucasian (100.0%), women (83.3%), asymptomatic (66.7%), and nonsmokers (83.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 78.0 years (range, 58.2-80.3 years). A higher proportion of patients who had SCCT were diagnosed with distant metastasis. The smears were cellular and demonstrated clean backgrounds without necrosis or mitotic activity. SCCTs comprised of bipolar-to-elongated cells with finely granular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, scant cytoplasm, and minimal atypia or pleomorphism. The tumor cells sometimes appeared boomerang-shaped and might mimic granulomas or blood vessels. SCCTs showed strong expression for pan-cytokeratin, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56, with weak TTF-1 and a very low Ki-67 proliferation index. All SCCTs had low tumor mutational burden and were microsatellite-stable. One case showed multiple whole-gene losses in chromosome 11, whereas another harbored duplication in ARID1A. Two cases demonstrated gains in chromosomes 17, one of which also showed gains in chromosome 18. None had a single nucleotide mutation.

Conclusions: SCCT is a rare subset of lung carcinoid tumors. These tumors harbor unique cytologic, prognostic, and molecular features that may have significant diagnostic and clinical implications.

背景:纺锤形细胞类癌(SCCT)是肺类癌的一种罕见变异型,主要或完全由纺锤形细胞组成。据作者所知,这是迄今为止第一项研究纺锤细胞类癌分子特征的研究:方法:研究人员回顾了 10 年间通过细针穿刺初步诊断出的 85 例类癌。最终诊断分类以切除标本为基础。根据细胞形态学、免疫组化和分子特征确定了六例SCCT:大多数 SCCT 患者为白种人(100.0%)、女性(83.3%)、无症状者(66.7%)和非吸烟者(83.3%)。确诊时的中位年龄为 78.0 岁(58.2-80.3 岁)。较高比例的 SCCT 患者被确诊为远处转移。涂片为细胞涂片,背景干净,无坏死或有丝分裂活动。SCCT由双极细胞到长形细胞组成,染色质呈细颗粒状,核仁不明显,胞浆稀少,非典型性或多形性极小。肿瘤细胞有时呈回旋镖状,可能与肉芽肿或血管相似。SCCT的泛细胞角蛋白、突触素、嗜铬粒蛋白和CD56表达较强,TTF-1较弱,Ki-67增殖指数很低。所有 SCCT 的肿瘤突变负荷都很低,且微卫星稳定。其中一个病例的11号染色体出现多个全基因缺失,另一个病例的ARID1A出现重复。两个病例的17号染色体发生了增益,其中一个病例的18号染色体也发生了增益。所有病例都没有单核苷酸突变:结论:SCCT是肺类癌的一个罕见亚型。这些肿瘤具有独特的细胞学、预后和分子特征,可能具有重要的诊断和临床意义。
{"title":"Cytomorphologic and molecular characterization of spindle cell carcinoid tumors of the lung.","authors":"Rachelle P Mendoza, Emily Symes, Peng Wang, Cole Miller, Stephanie C Thompson, Tatjana Antic, Anna Biernacka","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22886","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncy.22886","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spindle cell carcinoid tumor (SCCT) is a rare variant of lung carcinoid tumor consisting predominantly or exclusively of spindle cells. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to date investigating the molecular characteristics of SCCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-five carcinoid tumors initially diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration over a period of 10 years were reviewed. The final diagnostic classification was based on resection specimens. Six SCCTs were identified and characterized based on cytomorphology, and immunohistochemical and molecular features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients with SCCT were Caucasian (100.0%), women (83.3%), asymptomatic (66.7%), and nonsmokers (83.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 78.0 years (range, 58.2-80.3 years). A higher proportion of patients who had SCCT were diagnosed with distant metastasis. The smears were cellular and demonstrated clean backgrounds without necrosis or mitotic activity. SCCTs comprised of bipolar-to-elongated cells with finely granular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, scant cytoplasm, and minimal atypia or pleomorphism. The tumor cells sometimes appeared boomerang-shaped and might mimic granulomas or blood vessels. SCCTs showed strong expression for pan-cytokeratin, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56, with weak TTF-1 and a very low Ki-67 proliferation index. All SCCTs had low tumor mutational burden and were microsatellite-stable. One case showed multiple whole-gene losses in chromosome 11, whereas another harbored duplication in ARID1A. Two cases demonstrated gains in chromosomes 17, one of which also showed gains in chromosome 18. None had a single nucleotide mutation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCCT is a rare subset of lung carcinoid tumors. These tumors harbor unique cytologic, prognostic, and molecular features that may have significant diagnostic and clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141723188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. 与世界卫生组织胰胆细胞病理学报告系统诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险和总生存率。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22880
Wen-Yu Hsiao, Qun Wang

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system revised the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. To better stratify intraductal and/or cystic neoplasms by cytologic grade, the neoplastic, other category was replaced by two new categories: pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low-risk/grade (PaN-Low) and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, high-risk/grade (PaN-High). Low-grade malignancies were placed in the malignant category, and benign neoplasms were placed in the benign/negative for malignancy category.

Methods: An institutional pathology database search identified patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic lesions from January 2015 to April 2022. The absolute risk of malignancy (ROM) was determined by histologic and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months, and overall survival rates were calculated across diagnostic categories, comparing the WHO and PSC systems.

Results: In total, 1012 cases were reviewed and recategorized. The ROM for the WHO system was 8.3% for insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic, 3.2% for benign/negative for malignancy, 24.6% for atypical, 9.1% for PaN-Low, 46.7% for PaN-High, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. Comparatively, the ROM for the PSC system was 7.4% for nondiagnostic, 3.0% for negative for malignancy, 23.1% for atypical, 0% for neoplastic, benign, 7.3% for neoplastic, other, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. The WHO system demonstrated superior stratification for overall survival.

Conclusions: The WHO system significantly improves the stratification of ROM and overall survival across diagnostic categories by introducing the PaN-Low and PaN-High categories and reassigning low-grade malignancies to the malignant category. Analyzing EUS-FNA samples with the WHO system provides critical insights for guiding clinical management.

背景:世界卫生组织(WHO)的分类系统修订了巴氏细胞病理学会(PSC)的胰胆管细胞病理学报告系统。为了更好地按细胞学分级对导管内和/或囊性肿瘤进行分层,"肿瘤,其他 "类别被两个新类别取代:胰胆管肿瘤,低风险/分级(PaN-Low)和胰胆管肿瘤,高风险/分级(PaN-High)。低度恶性肿瘤归入恶性类别,良性肿瘤归入良性/恶性阴性类别:通过机构病理学数据库搜索,确定了2015年1月至2022年4月期间因胰腺病变接受内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)的患者。通过至少6个月的组织学和/或临床随访确定恶性肿瘤的绝对风险(ROM),并比较WHO和PSC系统,计算不同诊断类别的总生存率:结果:共对1012个病例进行了复查和重新分类。WHO系统的ROM为8.3%(不充分/不足/无诊断意义)、3.2%(良性/恶性阴性)、24.6%(不典型)、9.1%(PaN-Low)、46.7%(PaN-High)、75%(恶性可疑)和100%(恶性)。相比之下,PSC 系统的 ROM 为:7.4% 为非诊断性,3.0% 为恶性阴性,23.1% 为非典型,0% 为良性肿瘤,7.3% 为其他肿瘤,75% 为可疑恶性肿瘤,100% 为恶性肿瘤。WHO系统对总生存率的分层效果更佳:结论:WHO系统通过引入PaN-Low和PaN-High类别并将低度恶性肿瘤重新归入恶性类别,大大提高了各诊断类别的ROM分层和总生存率。用WHO系统分析EUS-FNA样本为指导临床治疗提供了重要的启示。
{"title":"Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.","authors":"Wen-Yu Hsiao, Qun Wang","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22880","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncy.22880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system revised the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. To better stratify intraductal and/or cystic neoplasms by cytologic grade, the neoplastic, other category was replaced by two new categories: pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low-risk/grade (PaN-Low) and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, high-risk/grade (PaN-High). Low-grade malignancies were placed in the malignant category, and benign neoplasms were placed in the benign/negative for malignancy category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional pathology database search identified patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic lesions from January 2015 to April 2022. The absolute risk of malignancy (ROM) was determined by histologic and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months, and overall survival rates were calculated across diagnostic categories, comparing the WHO and PSC systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1012 cases were reviewed and recategorized. The ROM for the WHO system was 8.3% for insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic, 3.2% for benign/negative for malignancy, 24.6% for atypical, 9.1% for PaN-Low, 46.7% for PaN-High, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. Comparatively, the ROM for the PSC system was 7.4% for nondiagnostic, 3.0% for negative for malignancy, 23.1% for atypical, 0% for neoplastic, benign, 7.3% for neoplastic, other, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. The WHO system demonstrated superior stratification for overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO system significantly improves the stratification of ROM and overall survival across diagnostic categories by introducing the PaN-Low and PaN-High categories and reassigning low-grade malignancies to the malignant category. Analyzing EUS-FNA samples with the WHO system provides critical insights for guiding clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141466332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Milan system atypia of undetermined significance: 5-year performance data. 意义不明的米兰系统不典型性:5 年业绩数据。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22883
Henri Lagerstam, Erkka Tommola, Saara Kares, Ivana Kholová

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the category atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) at the authors' institution based on the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

Methods: All AUS cases diagnosed at Fimlab Laboratories between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, were included. Histologic verifications were checked until May 31, 2023. The upper-bound and lower-bound risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were calculated. The timelines between the pathology laboratory workflow and patient management were also calculated.

Results: From 1157 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs), 162 (14.0%) AUS cases were diagnosed in 146 patients, with an average ± standard deviation age of 66.1 ± 14.9 years. There was variation in the AUS percentages, with higher values during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic years (15% and 17.5% in 2020 and 2021, respectively). Seventy-five cases (46.3%) had histologic follow-up: 16 were malignant neoplasms, and 36 were benign neoplasms. The upper and the lower bounds of the-risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were 21.3% and 69.3% and 9.9% and 32.1%, respectively. The average time from the first FNA with an AUS diagnosis to surgical resection ranged from 6 to 682 days, and the time to the first repeat FNA ranged from 10 to 691 days.

Conclusions: The results indicated higher percentages of AUS cases compared with the reference value, which may be attributed to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The risk of malignancy calculated in this study was closer to the reference value from the first edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology compared with the second edition.

背景:本研究旨在评估作者所在机构根据米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统对意义未定的不典型细胞(AUS)类别的诊断性能:纳入2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间Fimlab实验室诊断的所有AUS病例。组织学验证检查至 2023 年 5 月 31 日。计算出恶性肿瘤风险和肿瘤风险的上限和下限。同时还计算了病理实验室工作流程与患者管理之间的时间轴:在1157例细针穿刺(FNA)中,146名患者确诊了162例(14.0%)AUS病例,平均年龄(±标准差)为66.1±14.9岁。AUS 百分比存在差异,在冠状病毒疾病 2019 年大流行期间的数值较高(2020 年和 2021 年分别为 15%和 17.5%)。75例(46.3%)进行了组织学随访:16例为恶性肿瘤,36例为良性肿瘤。恶性肿瘤风险和肿瘤风险的上限和下限分别为 21.3% 和 69.3%,以及 9.9% 和 32.1%。从首次FNA诊断为AUS到手术切除的平均时间为6至682天,而从首次重复FNA到手术切除的平均时间为10至691天:结果显示,与参考值相比,AUS病例的百分比更高,这可能是由于2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行的影响。与第二版《米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统》相比,本研究计算出的恶性肿瘤风险更接近第一版的参考值。
{"title":"The Milan system atypia of undetermined significance: 5-year performance data.","authors":"Henri Lagerstam, Erkka Tommola, Saara Kares, Ivana Kholová","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22883","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncy.22883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the category atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) at the authors' institution based on the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All AUS cases diagnosed at Fimlab Laboratories between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, were included. Histologic verifications were checked until May 31, 2023. The upper-bound and lower-bound risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were calculated. The timelines between the pathology laboratory workflow and patient management were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1157 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs), 162 (14.0%) AUS cases were diagnosed in 146 patients, with an average ± standard deviation age of 66.1 ± 14.9 years. There was variation in the AUS percentages, with higher values during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic years (15% and 17.5% in 2020 and 2021, respectively). Seventy-five cases (46.3%) had histologic follow-up: 16 were malignant neoplasms, and 36 were benign neoplasms. The upper and the lower bounds of the-risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were 21.3% and 69.3% and 9.9% and 32.1%, respectively. The average time from the first FNA with an AUS diagnosis to surgical resection ranged from 6 to 682 days, and the time to the first repeat FNA ranged from 10 to 691 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicated higher percentages of AUS cases compared with the reference value, which may be attributed to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The risk of malignancy calculated in this study was closer to the reference value from the first edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology compared with the second edition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141603310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research and scholarly mentoring: A guide for pathology faculty and program directors. 研究与学术指导:病理学教师和项目主任指南。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22835
R Lane Coffee, Stephen John Cico
{"title":"Research and scholarly mentoring: A guide for pathology faculty and program directors.","authors":"R Lane Coffee, Stephen John Cico","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22835","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncy.22835","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Researchers confront a rising tide of cancer misinformation: A fledgling field of research has documented major harms from misinformation on cancer treatment and prevention and is weighing how physicians can best counter the bad advice. 研究人员正视日益增多的癌症误导信息:一个新兴的研究领域记录了癌症治疗和预防方面的错误信息所造成的重大危害,并正在权衡医生如何才能最好地应对这些不良建议。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22909
Bryn Nelson, William Faquin
{"title":"Researchers confront a rising tide of cancer misinformation: A fledgling field of research has documented major harms from misinformation on cancer treatment and prevention and is weighing how physicians can best counter the bad advice.","authors":"Bryn Nelson, William Faquin","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22909","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic performance of rapid on-site evaluation during bronchoscopy for lung cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis 支气管镜检查肺癌时现场快速评估的诊断性能:综合荟萃分析
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22908
Cheng-Chieh Chen, Shou-Cheng Lu, Yu-Kang Chang, Chyi-Huey Bai, Ke-Yu Hsiao, Kang-Yun Lee, Yuan-Hung Wang
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Screening high-risk populations for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality. Bronchoscopy is a diagnostic procedure used to monitor patients suspected of having lung cancer after LDCT. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), although its diagnostic value remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE during bronchoscopy.
肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的首要原因。使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)对高风险人群进行肺癌筛查可降低肺癌死亡率。支气管镜检查是用于监测低剂量计算机断层扫描后疑似肺癌患者的诊断程序。快速现场评估(ROSE)可提高支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术(EBUS-TBNA)的诊断准确性,但其诊断价值仍不明确。在这项荟萃分析中,作者评估了支气管镜检查期间 ROSE 的诊断准确性。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of rapid on-site evaluation during bronchoscopy for lung cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis","authors":"Cheng-Chieh Chen, Shou-Cheng Lu, Yu-Kang Chang, Chyi-Huey Bai, Ke-Yu Hsiao, Kang-Yun Lee, Yuan-Hung Wang","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22908","url":null,"abstract":"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Screening high-risk populations for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality. Bronchoscopy is a diagnostic procedure used to monitor patients suspected of having lung cancer after LDCT. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), although its diagnostic value remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE during bronchoscopy.","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142268797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk stratification of ThyroSeq results in indeterminate thyroid lesions: A single-institution experience of clinicopathologic correlation with cytologic findings 对 ThyroSeq 结果中的不确定甲状腺病变进行风险分层:临床病理学与细胞学结果相关性的单一机构经验
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22905
Wen-Yu Hsiao, Nabil F. Saba, Daniel Lubin, Amy Chen, Qiuying Shi
ThyroSeq offers the opportunity to stratify the risk of malignancy (ROM) in the characterization of indeterminate thyroid nodules, especially those categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). However, whether ThyroSeq interpretations correlate with cytologic features, management, and surgical outcome remains unclear.
ThyroSeq提供了对不确定甲状腺结节,尤其是那些被归类为意义未定的不典型结节(AUS)进行恶性风险分层(ROM)的机会。然而,ThyroSeq的解释是否与细胞学特征、管理和手术结果相关仍不清楚。
{"title":"Risk stratification of ThyroSeq results in indeterminate thyroid lesions: A single-institution experience of clinicopathologic correlation with cytologic findings","authors":"Wen-Yu Hsiao, Nabil F. Saba, Daniel Lubin, Amy Chen, Qiuying Shi","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22905","url":null,"abstract":"ThyroSeq offers the opportunity to stratify the risk of malignancy (ROM) in the characterization of indeterminate thyroid nodules, especially those categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). However, whether ThyroSeq interpretations correlate with cytologic features, management, and surgical outcome remains unclear.","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142252976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Writing our way through academia: Our journey as young faculty and book authors 书写我们的学术之路我们作为青年教师和图书作者的心路历程
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22902
Terrance James Lynn, Swikrity U. Baskota
<h3> Barriers to scholarly writing and publishing in academic medicine</h3><p>A recent College of American Pathologists survey indicated that the demand for pathologists has grown and is strong, because nearly one half of all respondents were seeking to hire at least one pathologist over the past decade.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As the shortage of pathologists and increasing workload continue to grow, finding the time and/or building the necessary scholarly writing skills in academia can be difficult. Previous researchers have identified several barriers to scholarly writing and publishing across various specialties in medicine.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Such barriers include inexperience in writing for scholarly publication, lack of confidence and writing-related anxiety, sensitivity to reviewers' feedback, and perceptions that publishing is optional but not required at their institution.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> One way to reduce barriers is to encourage scholarly activity and publishing during medical school. A 2019 study reported that medical students who had published before graduation were more likely to publish more after graduation.<span><sup>4</sup></span> In addition, opportunities to publish during residency could occur with the right mentoring from faculty in graduate medical education training programs.</p><p>It is also very easy to get discouraged when a paper is returned with lengthy comments from reviewers. This is especially true for young faculty trying to prove their worth to their institution and to themselves. Imposter syndrome is a frequent experience and certainly can be exacerbated by reviewers' comments. On the flip side, knowing when to challenge certain comments/feedback from reviewers is a delicate process that requires couth diplomacy.</p><h3> Learning from the right mentor</h3><p>As trainees and now young faculty members, both of us have been fortunate to have been mentored by some phenomenal mentors. These mentors demonstrated excellence through significant contributions to the field of cytopathology. There is something special about learning from the textbook that a mentor has written and having the opportunity to learn under that same individual. One <i>critical value</i> in a mentor is their ability to provide honest, timely, and constructive feedback. This feedback opens the door to building the mentee–mentor relationship. In addition to this, a mentor should be committed to the trainee and guide them through the process. In many ways, we were lucky because our mentors also afforded us the opportunity to co-author several articles with them during our time as trainees and even afterward. Another <i>critical value</i> of a mentor is the willingness to push the mentee to more ambitious goals. Without this added push, it is often difficult to grow into what you as a mentee are capable of.</p><h3> Writing an article versus writing a textbook</h3><p>A first and easy step to authorship is to start from writing
他们不仅对内容的生成很有价值,而且可以提供实时反馈和见解,以改进本书。确定合适的合作作者如上所述,要编写出最好的教科书,还需要更多的视角。确定合适的合著者可能具有挑战性,因为编写一本书的内容需要投入大量的时间。随着病理学家的短缺和病例量的增加,很难找到愿意付出时间的人。这可能会使成书过程变得更加复杂,但最终是值得的。在与可能的合著者联系时,重要的是要考虑一些事情,以确保他们是合适的人选。应首先考虑发表过文章和参与过研究的人作为合著者。他们已经具备了学术写作的基础,并且通常了解其专业领域的最新进展。此外,他们还可能有一名实习生与他们合作。这种合作可以让个人获得指导经验,同时帮助受训者或初级教师提高学术写作技巧。第二件最重要的事情是,团队项目的负责人必须非常清楚章节的范围、预期的时间承诺、作者的顺序以及提交的初步时间表。如果提交的截止日期很紧,不妨提前设定一个截止日期,以留出潜在的回旋余地。另外,在向共同作者提供工作机会之前,最好要求他们提供简历,并查看他们的出版物和研究专长,以确定他们的能力。最糟糕的事情莫过于,因为合著者的文章低于预期或根本就没有开始,而不得不重写或撰写整个章节。此外,应在转让之前明确作者身份顺序、书籍版税(如果有的话)以及对作者贡献的其他形式的补偿。在项目开始前正式撰写同意书并让他们签字是否明智。如果在项目启动前没有这样做,那么他们的名字在书中的位置就有可能不符合他们的期望(即封面与章节扉页)。选择合适的出版商选择合适的出版商是图书出版的另一项挑战。大多数出版商都是以营利为目的,因此知道哪些书能卖出去,哪些书卖不出去。最好的办法是找到一家出版本专业教科书的学术出版社。这些出版社通常会要求向其提交一章样本。经过内部审查和市场调研后,出版社会做出决定。如果做出了有利的决定,就会签订出版合同,合同中会有具体条款,包括最后期限。因此,如果您打算通过这一途径出版,遵守最后期限非常重要。合同的其他条款还包括版权、版税、责任和其他问题。如果您使用的是学术出版商,但其出版流程不适合您的需求,您还可以选择其他方式出版教科书。这些选择包括通过亚马逊、B&amp;N Press 等公司直接出版(自助出版)。虽然这些公司可能不太受学术机构的青睐,但对于年轻教师来说,这可能是迈出的第一步。直接出版会带来一些挑战,因为您通常必须支付校对和编辑、营销费用,以及确保您的材料以适当的格式制作成电子书。降低审稿/编辑成本的一个潜在解决方案是让学术界人士审稿。志愿审稿人面临的挑战是,他们基本上没有义务尽最大努力审稿,因为审稿需要的不仅仅是阅读。审稿人没有发现的文本中的错误可能会对图书的销售能力产生深远影响,因为出版后会出现负面评论。例如,有些人在经济上有出版图书的动机,他们可能会利用你的作品,而你可能没有意识到这一点。例如,如果没有签订协议,直接出版图书的个人,无论是以企业名义还是个人名义,都有可能将这些作品复制并粘贴到未来的图书中,而根本不会询问你或让你意识到这一点。
{"title":"Writing our way through academia: Our journey as young faculty and book authors","authors":"Terrance James Lynn, Swikrity U. Baskota","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22902","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3&gt; Barriers to scholarly writing and publishing in academic medicine&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;A recent College of American Pathologists survey indicated that the demand for pathologists has grown and is strong, because nearly one half of all respondents were seeking to hire at least one pathologist over the past decade.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; As the shortage of pathologists and increasing workload continue to grow, finding the time and/or building the necessary scholarly writing skills in academia can be difficult. Previous researchers have identified several barriers to scholarly writing and publishing across various specialties in medicine.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Such barriers include inexperience in writing for scholarly publication, lack of confidence and writing-related anxiety, sensitivity to reviewers' feedback, and perceptions that publishing is optional but not required at their institution.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; One way to reduce barriers is to encourage scholarly activity and publishing during medical school. A 2019 study reported that medical students who had published before graduation were more likely to publish more after graduation.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In addition, opportunities to publish during residency could occur with the right mentoring from faculty in graduate medical education training programs.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;It is also very easy to get discouraged when a paper is returned with lengthy comments from reviewers. This is especially true for young faculty trying to prove their worth to their institution and to themselves. Imposter syndrome is a frequent experience and certainly can be exacerbated by reviewers' comments. On the flip side, knowing when to challenge certain comments/feedback from reviewers is a delicate process that requires couth diplomacy.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;h3&gt; Learning from the right mentor&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;As trainees and now young faculty members, both of us have been fortunate to have been mentored by some phenomenal mentors. These mentors demonstrated excellence through significant contributions to the field of cytopathology. There is something special about learning from the textbook that a mentor has written and having the opportunity to learn under that same individual. One &lt;i&gt;critical value&lt;/i&gt; in a mentor is their ability to provide honest, timely, and constructive feedback. This feedback opens the door to building the mentee–mentor relationship. In addition to this, a mentor should be committed to the trainee and guide them through the process. In many ways, we were lucky because our mentors also afforded us the opportunity to co-author several articles with them during our time as trainees and even afterward. Another &lt;i&gt;critical value&lt;/i&gt; of a mentor is the willingness to push the mentee to more ambitious goals. Without this added push, it is often difficult to grow into what you as a mentee are capable of.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000&lt;h3&gt; Writing an article versus writing a textbook&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt;A first and easy step to authorship is to start from writing","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142268501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome 1 expression in breast and nonbreast metastases from Müllerian, lung, gastrointestinal tract, and pancreatic primary tumors by immunohistochemistry with cytology cell block specimens 通过细胞学细胞块标本的免疫组织化学方法,观察毛细血管畸形综合征 1 在缪勒氏、肺、胃肠道和胰腺原发肿瘤的乳腺和非乳腺转移瘤中的表达情况
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22901
Deepak Donthi, Qiong Gan, Qing Qing Ding, Savitri Krishnamurthy
BackgroundTrichorhinophalangeal syndrome 1 (TRPS1) expression in primary breast and other solid tumors has been investigated but its role as a marker in metastatic tumors is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of TRPS1 as a breast cancer immunomarker in metastatic tumors that originated from breast, Müllerian, lung, gastrointestinal (GI), and pancreatic primary tumors with cell blocks from fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and effusion specimens.MethodsCell blocks were immunostained with anti‐TRPS1 monoclonal antibody (clone EPR16171). Histochemical scores (H scores) (proportion × intensity; range, 0–300) were assigned; H scores of ≥10 were considered positive. Overall, 160 specimens were examined, including 127 FNAs (35 breast, 25 Müllerian, 36 lung, and 31 GI and pancreatic carcinomas) and 33 effusion specimens (18 breast, 12 Müllerian, one lung, and two GI carcinomas).ResultsTRPS1 was positive in 51 of 53 (96%) metastatic breast carcinomas and in 28 of 107 (26.2%) nonbreast metastatic tumors. Metastatic breast carcinoma showed the highest mean H score of 247.35, compared to 45.36 in Müllerian, 8.4 in lung, and 5.88 in GI tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of TRPS1 for identifying a breast origin in metastatic tumors was 96.22% and 72.89%, respectively.ConclusionsDespite high overall sensitivity, TRPS1 showed lower specificity as a breast immunomarker because of its expression in nonbreast tumors. The mean H score in nonbreast tumors was significantly lower than in metastatic breast tumors. It is important to recognize the broad range of expression of TRPS1 in metastatic breast and nonbreast tumors to avoid an incorrect determination of a metastatic tumor’s organ of origin.
背景已经对原发性乳腺癌和其他实体瘤中三尖瓣综合征 1(TRPS1)的表达进行了研究,但其作为转移性肿瘤标志物的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估 TRPS1 作为乳腺癌免疫标记物的敏感性和特异性,这些转移瘤来源于乳腺、缪勒氏、肺、胃肠道(GI)和胰腺原发性肿瘤的细针穿刺(FNA)和渗出标本的细胞块。进行组织化学评分(H 评分)(比例×强度;范围 0-300);H 评分≥10 为阳性。总共检查了 160 份标本,包括 127 份 FNA(35 份乳腺癌、25 份缪勒氏癌、36 份肺癌、31 份消化道和胰腺癌)和 33 份渗出标本(18 份乳腺癌、12 份缪勒氏癌、1 份肺癌、2 份消化道癌)。转移性乳腺癌的平均 H 评分最高,为 247.35 分,而穆勒氏癌为 45.36 分,肺癌为 8.4 分,消化道肿瘤为 5.88 分。结论尽管总体灵敏度较高,但 TRPS1 作为乳腺免疫标志物的特异性较低,因为它在非乳腺肿瘤中也有表达。非乳腺肿瘤的平均 H 评分明显低于转移性乳腺肿瘤。认识到TRPS1在转移性乳腺肿瘤和非乳腺肿瘤中的广泛表达非常重要,以避免错误判断转移性肿瘤的来源器官。
{"title":"Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome 1 expression in breast and nonbreast metastases from Müllerian, lung, gastrointestinal tract, and pancreatic primary tumors by immunohistochemistry with cytology cell block specimens","authors":"Deepak Donthi, Qiong Gan, Qing Qing Ding, Savitri Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22901","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22901","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundTrichorhinophalangeal syndrome 1 (TRPS1) expression in primary breast and other solid tumors has been investigated but its role as a marker in metastatic tumors is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of TRPS1 as a breast cancer immunomarker in metastatic tumors that originated from breast, Müllerian, lung, gastrointestinal (GI), and pancreatic primary tumors with cell blocks from fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and effusion specimens.MethodsCell blocks were immunostained with anti‐TRPS1 monoclonal antibody (clone EPR16171). Histochemical scores (H scores) (proportion × intensity; range, 0–300) were assigned; H scores of ≥10 were considered positive. Overall, 160 specimens were examined, including 127 FNAs (35 breast, 25 Müllerian, 36 lung, and 31 GI and pancreatic carcinomas) and 33 effusion specimens (18 breast, 12 Müllerian, one lung, and two GI carcinomas).ResultsTRPS1 was positive in 51 of 53 (96%) metastatic breast carcinomas and in 28 of 107 (26.2%) nonbreast metastatic tumors. Metastatic breast carcinoma showed the highest mean H score of 247.35, compared to 45.36 in Müllerian, 8.4 in lung, and 5.88 in GI tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of TRPS1 for identifying a breast origin in metastatic tumors was 96.22% and 72.89%, respectively.ConclusionsDespite high overall sensitivity, TRPS1 showed lower specificity as a breast immunomarker because of its expression in nonbreast tumors. The mean H score in nonbreast tumors was significantly lower than in metastatic breast tumors. It is important to recognize the broad range of expression of TRPS1 in metastatic breast and nonbreast tumors to avoid an incorrect determination of a metastatic tumor’s organ of origin.","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142227082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1