Perceived challenges in treatment decision-making for endometriosis: healthcare professional perspectives.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2024.2383469
Lynda Fallon, Annie Y S Lau, Donna Ciccia, Tanya Jane Duckworth, Chantelle Pereira, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica, Kerry A Sherman
{"title":"Perceived challenges in treatment decision-making for endometriosis: healthcare professional perspectives.","authors":"Lynda Fallon, Annie Y S Lau, Donna Ciccia, Tanya Jane Duckworth, Chantelle Pereira, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica, Kerry A Sherman","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2024.2383469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis, a systemic chronic inflammatory condition which has no cure, has a high symptom burden that can negatively impact every facet of life. Given the absence of a gold-standard treatment, the best symptom management regimen in endometriosis is heavily reliant on a patient's values and preferences, making shared decision-making (SDM) vital. However, a comprehensive patient decision aid (PtDA) intervention that could facilitate patient decision-making and promote SDM is lacking in endometriosis, and there is little research on the decisional support needs of individuals with this condition. This qualitative study aimed to explore healthcare professional (HP) perspectives of their clients' decisional support needs when choosing treatments to manage endometriosis symptoms, with a view to evaluating the need for a PtDA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Australian HPs identified as specialising in endometriosis care (<i>N</i> = 13) were invited to participate in a short interview over the Internet by phone. Questions focussed on perceived facilitators and challenges of decision-making when choosing treatments for endometriosis. Transcribed qualitative data were thematically analysed and verified by multiple coders, using the template approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) Identifying and setting priorities; (2) HPs' lack of time and perceived lack of knowledge; (3) Patient-centred care and SDM, including patient capacity; and (4) Decision-making blinded by hope. This is the first known study to explore HPs' perspectives on patient decision-making challenges in endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings draw attention to the difficulties people with endometriosis experience when assessing and choosing treatments, highlighting the need for a comprehensive PtDA intervention to support this decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2024.2383469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis, a systemic chronic inflammatory condition which has no cure, has a high symptom burden that can negatively impact every facet of life. Given the absence of a gold-standard treatment, the best symptom management regimen in endometriosis is heavily reliant on a patient's values and preferences, making shared decision-making (SDM) vital. However, a comprehensive patient decision aid (PtDA) intervention that could facilitate patient decision-making and promote SDM is lacking in endometriosis, and there is little research on the decisional support needs of individuals with this condition. This qualitative study aimed to explore healthcare professional (HP) perspectives of their clients' decisional support needs when choosing treatments to manage endometriosis symptoms, with a view to evaluating the need for a PtDA.

Methods: Australian HPs identified as specialising in endometriosis care (N = 13) were invited to participate in a short interview over the Internet by phone. Questions focussed on perceived facilitators and challenges of decision-making when choosing treatments for endometriosis. Transcribed qualitative data were thematically analysed and verified by multiple coders, using the template approach.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) Identifying and setting priorities; (2) HPs' lack of time and perceived lack of knowledge; (3) Patient-centred care and SDM, including patient capacity; and (4) Decision-making blinded by hope. This is the first known study to explore HPs' perspectives on patient decision-making challenges in endometriosis.

Discussion: Findings draw attention to the difficulties people with endometriosis experience when assessing and choosing treatments, highlighting the need for a comprehensive PtDA intervention to support this decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症治疗决策过程中遇到的挑战:医护人员的观点。
背景:子宫内膜异位症是一种无法治愈的全身性慢性炎症,其症状负担很重,会对生活的方方面面产生负面影响。由于缺乏金标准疗法,子宫内膜异位症的最佳症状治疗方案在很大程度上取决于患者的价值观和偏好,因此共同决策(SDM)至关重要。然而,目前在子宫内膜异位症领域还缺乏一种全面的患者决策辅助(PtDA)干预措施来帮助患者做出决策并促进 SDM,而且有关该病患者决策支持需求的研究也很少。这项定性研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员(HP)对其客户在选择治疗方法以控制子宫内膜异位症症状时的决策支持需求的看法,从而评估对 PtDA 的需求:方法:邀请专门从事子宫内膜异位症治疗的澳大利亚医护人员(13 人)通过互联网参加简短的电话访谈。问题主要集中在选择子宫内膜异位症治疗方法时决策过程中的促进因素和挑战。采用模板法对转录的定性数据进行主题分析,并由多个编码员进行验证:结果:确定了四个主题:(1) 确定和设定优先事项;(2) HPs 缺乏时间和感知到的知识匮乏;(3) 以患者为中心的护理和 SDM,包括患者能力;(4) 被希望蒙蔽的决策。这是已知的第一项探讨子宫内膜异位症患者决策挑战的研究:讨论:研究结果引起了人们对子宫内膜异位症患者在评估和选择治疗方法时所遇到的困难的关注,强调了需要全面的PtDA干预来支持这种决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive emotional regulation in physiotherapy students in Croatia. Look, over there! A streaker! - Qualitative study examining streaking as a behaviour change technique for habit formation in recreational runners. Factors influencing health-related quality of life of children with overweight and obesity in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Navigating post-ICU care: understanding family members' experiences - a qualitative study. Supporting General Practitioners and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: the contribution of Collective Intelligence to the development of the 'Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia' (MIAMI) intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1