Frank Lobbezoo, Chia-Shu Lin, Mats Trulsson, Abhishek Kumar, Merel C. Verhoeff
{"title":"Using your jaws sharpens your teeth… and mind!","authors":"Frank Lobbezoo, Chia-Shu Lin, Mats Trulsson, Abhishek Kumar, Merel C. Verhoeff","doi":"10.1111/joor.13826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teeth grinding (bruxism) is commonly considered sheer jaw abuse because of its purported negative consequences like tooth wear and jaw-muscle pain. However, already in 1960, R.G. Every published a Point of View in the <i>Lancet</i> stating that bruxism-related tooth wear may be positive for the individual, the wear process being a means to sharpen the teeth to be used as tools or weapons.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Now, we would like to propose another possible positive outcome of bruxism, namely improved cognitive function. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Weijenberg et al.<span><sup>2</sup></span> concluded that both animal and human studies suggest an association between chewing and cognition. Klineberg et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> elaborated on this conclusion by stating that the increased cerebral blood flow that is associated with mastication could explain its positive effect on cognitive function. Importantly, they also stated that impaired cognition arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. This was confirmed by Lin<span><sup>4</sup></span> who provides some critical aspects that need to be incorporated into future research. For example, since most of the currently available clinical and epidemiological data are derived from cross-sectional studies, Lin emphasises the importance of prospective cohort studies to enable causal inferences.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Recently, Kim and Han<span><sup>5</sup></span> investigated the effects of reduced chewing ability on the incidence of cognitive impairment over 10 years in a large general population sample. Their findings, namely an about 1.3 times higher odds ratio for cognitive impairment in poor chewers as compared to good chewers, confirmed that reduced masticatory efficiency causally contributes to cognitive decline.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Since both chewing and bruxism are essentially jaw-muscle activities, that is, ways of using the jaws that both improve cerebral blood flow, we carefully assume that chewing-related findings can be extrapolated to bruxism. To further determine the evidence base for the association between jaw usage and cognition, a quick scan of the available literature was performed in PubMed on June 1, 2024, using the query “((“Mastication”[Mesh]) OR “Bruxism”[Mesh]) AND “Cognition”[Mesh].” This search yielded 115 papers, of which 56 did not deal with the topic of interest. Of the remaining 59 papers, only six reported no (or a negative) association between jaw usage and cognition, while 53 confirmed the likely presence of such associations. In some cases, even a causal relationship was claimed. Of note, only one of these 53 papers dealt with bruxism; the others with chewing. Hence, more research on bruxism in association with cognition is needed, bearing in mind that designing such studies will be a major challenge. Nevertheless, based on the above, we dare to conclude that using your jaw, either by bruxing or by chewing, not only sharpens your teeth, but also your mind.</p><p>All authors contributed equally and substantially to the conception, drafting and critical revision of this correspondence, and approved the final version. They are all responsible for all aspects of the work.</p><p>No funding was obtained for this manuscript.</p><p>FL receives research grants from Sunstar Suisse, S.A., Vivisol-Resmed, Health Holland and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), unrelated to this Correspondence. FL is an unsalaried member of the Academic Advisory Board of Sunstar Suisse S.A. for GrindCare. CSL, MT, AK and MCV report no competing interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"51 11","pages":"2498-2499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joor.13826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teeth grinding (bruxism) is commonly considered sheer jaw abuse because of its purported negative consequences like tooth wear and jaw-muscle pain. However, already in 1960, R.G. Every published a Point of View in the Lancet stating that bruxism-related tooth wear may be positive for the individual, the wear process being a means to sharpen the teeth to be used as tools or weapons.1 Now, we would like to propose another possible positive outcome of bruxism, namely improved cognitive function. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Weijenberg et al.2 concluded that both animal and human studies suggest an association between chewing and cognition. Klineberg et al.3 elaborated on this conclusion by stating that the increased cerebral blood flow that is associated with mastication could explain its positive effect on cognitive function. Importantly, they also stated that impaired cognition arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors. This was confirmed by Lin4 who provides some critical aspects that need to be incorporated into future research. For example, since most of the currently available clinical and epidemiological data are derived from cross-sectional studies, Lin emphasises the importance of prospective cohort studies to enable causal inferences.4 Recently, Kim and Han5 investigated the effects of reduced chewing ability on the incidence of cognitive impairment over 10 years in a large general population sample. Their findings, namely an about 1.3 times higher odds ratio for cognitive impairment in poor chewers as compared to good chewers, confirmed that reduced masticatory efficiency causally contributes to cognitive decline.5 Since both chewing and bruxism are essentially jaw-muscle activities, that is, ways of using the jaws that both improve cerebral blood flow, we carefully assume that chewing-related findings can be extrapolated to bruxism. To further determine the evidence base for the association between jaw usage and cognition, a quick scan of the available literature was performed in PubMed on June 1, 2024, using the query “((“Mastication”[Mesh]) OR “Bruxism”[Mesh]) AND “Cognition”[Mesh].” This search yielded 115 papers, of which 56 did not deal with the topic of interest. Of the remaining 59 papers, only six reported no (or a negative) association between jaw usage and cognition, while 53 confirmed the likely presence of such associations. In some cases, even a causal relationship was claimed. Of note, only one of these 53 papers dealt with bruxism; the others with chewing. Hence, more research on bruxism in association with cognition is needed, bearing in mind that designing such studies will be a major challenge. Nevertheless, based on the above, we dare to conclude that using your jaw, either by bruxing or by chewing, not only sharpens your teeth, but also your mind.
All authors contributed equally and substantially to the conception, drafting and critical revision of this correspondence, and approved the final version. They are all responsible for all aspects of the work.
No funding was obtained for this manuscript.
FL receives research grants from Sunstar Suisse, S.A., Vivisol-Resmed, Health Holland and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), unrelated to this Correspondence. FL is an unsalaried member of the Academic Advisory Board of Sunstar Suisse S.A. for GrindCare. CSL, MT, AK and MCV report no competing interests.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.