The Web-based Open-access Reliable Decision on Synonyms (WORDS) English Vocabulary Test.

Q1 Psychology Journal of Cognition Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/joc.391
Po-Heng Chen, Rachael C Hulme, Lena M Blott, Jennifer M Rodd
{"title":"The Web-based Open-access Reliable Decision on Synonyms (WORDS) English Vocabulary Test.","authors":"Po-Heng Chen, Rachael C Hulme, Lena M Blott, Jennifer M Rodd","doi":"10.5334/joc.391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A quick and reliable test of vocabulary knowledge is a vital component of many studies looking at a range of language processing skills. Recent proliferation of online (web-based) research has generated a growing need for reliable open-access vocabulary tests that can be administered online. This data report presents the newly developed 30-item Web-based Open-access Reliable Decision on Synonyms (WORDS) English Vocabulary Test. In Experiment 1, we tested 109 participants (age range: 18-69 years) on an initial set of 51 potential multiple-choice test items in which participants read a target word (e.g., <i>ubiquitous</i>) and selected a (near-)synonym (e.g., <i>omnipresent</i>) from among three semantically unrelated foils (e.g., <i>interpersonal, catatonic, voluminous</i>). We conducted an item response theory analysis of participants' accuracy data to select an optimal subset of 30 items to include in the final version of the test. In Experiment 2, we verified the reliability of this 30-item version in a different sample (<i>N</i> = 121; 18-79 years); reliability (internal consistency) was good (Cronbach's α = 0.82). We confirmed that, consistent with numerous previous studies, (1) responses were more accurate and quicker for more frequent compared to less frequent words, and (2) older adults showed greater vocabulary knowledge compared to younger adults. The WORDS test takes on average 4 minutes (5 minutes 40 seconds including consent/debrief) to complete. It can be freely accessed via Gorilla Open Materials (https://app.gorilla.sc/openmaterials/694887), allowing ease of use and for useful comparisons between data collected by different researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"7 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A quick and reliable test of vocabulary knowledge is a vital component of many studies looking at a range of language processing skills. Recent proliferation of online (web-based) research has generated a growing need for reliable open-access vocabulary tests that can be administered online. This data report presents the newly developed 30-item Web-based Open-access Reliable Decision on Synonyms (WORDS) English Vocabulary Test. In Experiment 1, we tested 109 participants (age range: 18-69 years) on an initial set of 51 potential multiple-choice test items in which participants read a target word (e.g., ubiquitous) and selected a (near-)synonym (e.g., omnipresent) from among three semantically unrelated foils (e.g., interpersonal, catatonic, voluminous). We conducted an item response theory analysis of participants' accuracy data to select an optimal subset of 30 items to include in the final version of the test. In Experiment 2, we verified the reliability of this 30-item version in a different sample (N = 121; 18-79 years); reliability (internal consistency) was good (Cronbach's α = 0.82). We confirmed that, consistent with numerous previous studies, (1) responses were more accurate and quicker for more frequent compared to less frequent words, and (2) older adults showed greater vocabulary knowledge compared to younger adults. The WORDS test takes on average 4 minutes (5 minutes 40 seconds including consent/debrief) to complete. It can be freely accessed via Gorilla Open Materials (https://app.gorilla.sc/openmaterials/694887), allowing ease of use and for useful comparisons between data collected by different researchers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网络的开放式同义词可靠判定 (WORDS) 英语词汇量测试。
快速可靠的词汇知识测试是许多语言处理技能研究的重要组成部分。近年来,在线(基于网络)研究日益增多,因此对可在线进行的可靠的开放式词汇测试的需求也越来越大。本数据报告介绍了新开发的 30 个项目的基于网络的同义词可靠决策(WORDS)英语词汇测试。在实验 1 中,我们对 109 名参与者(年龄范围:18-69 岁)进行了测试,测试的初始题目是 51 个潜在的多项选择测试项目,参与者阅读一个目标词(如:ubiquitous),并从三个语义无关的陪衬词(如:interpersonal、catatonic、voluminous)中选择一个(近)同义词(如:omnipresent)。我们对受试者的准确率数据进行了项目反应理论分析,以选出最佳的 30 个项目子集,并将其纳入测试的最终版本。在实验 2 中,我们在不同的样本(样本数 = 121;18-79 岁)中验证了这 30 个项目版本的可靠性;可靠性(内部一致性)良好(克朗巴赫系数 α = 0.82)。我们证实,与之前的大量研究结果一致,(1) 与词频较低的人相比,词频较高的人的回答更准确、更迅速;(2) 与年轻人相比,老年人的词汇知识更丰富。完成 WORDS 测试平均需要 4 分钟(包括同意/简述在内为 5 分 40 秒)。该测试可通过 Gorilla Open Materials (https://app.gorilla.sc/openmaterials/694887) 免费获取,使用方便,并可对不同研究人员收集的数据进行有用的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Long-term Contingency Learning Depends on Contingency Awareness. I am Once Again Asking for Your Attention: A Replication of Feature-Based Attention Modulations of Binding Effects with Picture Stimuli. Implicit Learning of Parity and Magnitude Associations with Number Color. Exploring Inhibitory Control Processes in Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM): A Single Case Study. Readiness for Perception and Action: Towards a More Mechanistic Understanding of Phasic Alertness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1