Surveying Undergraduate Medical Students' Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies in the First and Last Year of Medical School.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z
Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro
{"title":"Surveying Undergraduate Medical Students' Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies in the First and Last Year of Medical School.","authors":"Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivation to learn has been linked to learning outcomes, academic performance, learner well-being, and choice of medical specialty. Previous studies showed successful educational interventions to optimize students' levels of motivation and learning strategies. The purposes of this study are (1) to describe undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in the first and last year at a Canadian university and (2) to analyze possible differences between undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in those two academic years. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The survey was sent to a total of 207 first-year and 203 third-year students. We received a total of 58 surveys, 32 of them were complete and analyzed. The overall response rate was 14.1%. The internal consistency for all the scales varied from 0.61 to 0.904. The overall score for the survey was 4.97 on a 7-point scale for all students. Highest scales' scores were obtained for elaboration (mean 5.68) and learning beliefs (mean 5.64), with the lowest scores obtained for rehearsal (3.82) and test anxiety (3.94). The total scores did not differ by students' academic year (<i>p</i> = 0.764), except for the effort regulation scale in which first-year students scored higher (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The largest differences between first- and last-year students were found in effort regulation, where first-years scored higher (difference of 0.99), followed by peer learning (difference of - 0.51), and then test anxiety (- 0.36). Our results showed a sample of students that are highly motivated, mostly driven by intrinsic goals, and are confident that they will master the tasks given to them. They rely more on elaboration strategies building connections between new and prior information, and less in rehearsal strategies used for simple tasks and memorization. The MSLQ showed to be a reliable instrument in our sample, and it could be use as an instrument to identify students' adaptive changes to enhance students' motivation to learn. A portrayal of medical students' attitudes in learning could guide educators to develop instructional programs that would help students to optimize their own learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"34 4","pages":"783-793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation to learn has been linked to learning outcomes, academic performance, learner well-being, and choice of medical specialty. Previous studies showed successful educational interventions to optimize students' levels of motivation and learning strategies. The purposes of this study are (1) to describe undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in the first and last year at a Canadian university and (2) to analyze possible differences between undergraduate medical students' motivational orientations and learning strategies in those two academic years. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The survey was sent to a total of 207 first-year and 203 third-year students. We received a total of 58 surveys, 32 of them were complete and analyzed. The overall response rate was 14.1%. The internal consistency for all the scales varied from 0.61 to 0.904. The overall score for the survey was 4.97 on a 7-point scale for all students. Highest scales' scores were obtained for elaboration (mean 5.68) and learning beliefs (mean 5.64), with the lowest scores obtained for rehearsal (3.82) and test anxiety (3.94). The total scores did not differ by students' academic year (p = 0.764), except for the effort regulation scale in which first-year students scored higher (p = 0.01). The largest differences between first- and last-year students were found in effort regulation, where first-years scored higher (difference of 0.99), followed by peer learning (difference of - 0.51), and then test anxiety (- 0.36). Our results showed a sample of students that are highly motivated, mostly driven by intrinsic goals, and are confident that they will master the tasks given to them. They rely more on elaboration strategies building connections between new and prior information, and less in rehearsal strategies used for simple tasks and memorization. The MSLQ showed to be a reliable instrument in our sample, and it could be use as an instrument to identify students' adaptive changes to enhance students' motivation to learn. A portrayal of medical students' attitudes in learning could guide educators to develop instructional programs that would help students to optimize their own learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查医学院本科生在医学院第一年和最后一年的学习动机取向和学习策略。
学习动机与学习成果、学习成绩、学习者的幸福感和医学专业的选择有关。以往的研究表明,成功的教育干预可以优化学生的学习动机和学习策略水平。本研究的目的是:(1)描述加拿大一所大学医科本科生在第一年和最后一年的学习动机取向和学习策略;(2)分析这两个学年医科本科生的学习动机取向和学习策略之间可能存在的差异。我们使用 "学习动机策略问卷"(MSLQ)进行了一项在线横断面调查。调查对象包括 207 名一年级学生和 203 名三年级学生。我们共收到 58 份调查问卷,其中 32 份完整,并进行了分析。总回复率为 14.1%。所有量表的内部一致性从 0.61 到 0.904 不等。所有学生的调查总得分为 4.97(7 分制)。阐述(平均 5.68)和学习信念(平均 5.64)的量表得分最高,预演(3.82)和考试焦虑(3.94)的量表得分最低。除努力调节量表中一年级学生得分较高外(p = 0.01),总分在不同学年的学生之间没有差异(p = 0.764)。一年级和二年级学生在努力调节方面的差异最大,一年级学生得分更高(差异为 0.99),其次是同伴学习(差异为-0.51),然后是考试焦虑(-0.36)。我们的研究结果表明,样本学生的学习动机很强,主要是受内在目标的驱动,并对自己能够掌握所接受的任务充满信心。他们更依赖于在新信息和先前信息之间建立联系的阐述策略,而较少依赖于用于简单任务和记忆的排练策略。在我们的样本中,MSLQ 是一个可靠的工具,可以用来识别学生的适应性变化,以增强学生的学习动机。对医科学生学习态度的描述可以指导教育者制定教学计划,帮助学生优化自己的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
期刊最新文献
Letter from the Editor. Mini Self-Retrieval Practices of Skeletal Muscles in the Human Gross Anatomy Course. Letter from the Editor. Correction to: Early Exposure of Medical Students to a Formal Research Program Promotes Successful Scholarship in a Multi-Campus Medical School. Addressing Health Disparities in Hypertension: A Comprehensive Medical Elective and Survey Study Among Medical Students and Professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1