{"title":"Nursing insights on the effectiveness of automated pupillometry in two distinct pediatric intensive care units","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Automated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><p>These findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X/pdfft?md5=363dab7af0e82d5d382efeb2adb06600&pid=1-s2.0-S088259632400294X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088259632400294X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Automated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol.
Methods
We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings.
Results
A total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control.
Conclusion
Nurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments.
Practice implications
These findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS)
The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief.
Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.