Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.028
Grace P Abris, David J Shavlik, Roy O Mathew, Fayth M Butler, Jisoo Oh, Rawiwan Sirirat, Lars E Sveen, Gary E Fraser
{"title":"Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort.","authors":"Grace P Abris, David J Shavlik, Roy O Mathew, Fayth M Butler, Jisoo Oh, Rawiwan Sirirat, Lars E Sveen, Gary E Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There have been mixed results reported internationally when associating vegetarian dietary patterns with all-cause and cause-specific mortalities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to extend our previous results by evaluating, with a larger number of deaths (N = 12,515), cause-specific mortalities comparing different vegetarian types with nonvegetarians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study used data from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Mortality was ascertained between study baseline, 2002-2007, and follow-up through 2015. Dietary data were collected at baseline using a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire and then categorized into 5 dietary patterns: nonvegetarian, semivegetarian, pescovegetarian, lacto-ovovegetarian, and vegan. Main outcomes and measures include all-cause and cause-specific mortalities using Cox proportional hazards regression models and competing risk methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 88,400 participants who provided 971,424 person-years of follow-up. We report results pairwise as estimated at ages 65 and 85 y owing to age dependence of many hazard ratios (HRs). Compared with nonvegetarians, vegetarians had lower risks of mortality, overall (HR: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83, 0.95; HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.04), from renal failure (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.70; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.76), infectious disease (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.82; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.17), diabetes (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.78; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.88), select cardiac (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.87; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.95), and ischemic heart disease causes (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.90; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75,0.94). Vegans, lacto-ovovegetarians, and pescovegetarians were also observed to have lower risks of total mortality and several similar cause-specific mortalities. However, higher cause-specified neurologic mortalities were observed among older vegetarians (estimated at age 85 y), specifically stroke (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.33), dementia (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.27), and Parkinson's disease (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.91). Results in Black subjects for vegetarian/nonvegetarian comparisons largely followed the same trends, but HRs were less precise owing to smaller numbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vegetarian diets are associated with lower risk for all-cause and many cause-specific mortalities, especially among males and in younger subjects. However, higher risks are observed among older vegetarians for stroke and dementia. These results need further support and investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There have been mixed results reported internationally when associating vegetarian dietary patterns with all-cause and cause-specific mortalities.

Objectives: This study aimed to extend our previous results by evaluating, with a larger number of deaths (N = 12,515), cause-specific mortalities comparing different vegetarian types with nonvegetarians.

Methods: This prospective study used data from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Mortality was ascertained between study baseline, 2002-2007, and follow-up through 2015. Dietary data were collected at baseline using a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire and then categorized into 5 dietary patterns: nonvegetarian, semivegetarian, pescovegetarian, lacto-ovovegetarian, and vegan. Main outcomes and measures include all-cause and cause-specific mortalities using Cox proportional hazards regression models and competing risk methods.

Results: The analytic sample included 88,400 participants who provided 971,424 person-years of follow-up. We report results pairwise as estimated at ages 65 and 85 y owing to age dependence of many hazard ratios (HRs). Compared with nonvegetarians, vegetarians had lower risks of mortality, overall (HR: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83, 0.95; HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.04), from renal failure (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.70; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.76), infectious disease (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.82; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.17), diabetes (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.78; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.88), select cardiac (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.87; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.95), and ischemic heart disease causes (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.90; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75,0.94). Vegans, lacto-ovovegetarians, and pescovegetarians were also observed to have lower risks of total mortality and several similar cause-specific mortalities. However, higher cause-specified neurologic mortalities were observed among older vegetarians (estimated at age 85 y), specifically stroke (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.33), dementia (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.27), and Parkinson's disease (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.91). Results in Black subjects for vegetarian/nonvegetarian comparisons largely followed the same trends, but HRs were less precise owing to smaller numbers.

Conclusions: Vegetarian diets are associated with lower risk for all-cause and many cause-specific mortalities, especially among males and in younger subjects. However, higher risks are observed among older vegetarians for stroke and dementia. These results need further support and investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基督复临安息日会健康研究-2(Adventist Health Study-2)队列中素食者与非素食者的特定病因和全因死亡率比较。
背景:国际上关于素食模式与全因和特定原因死亡率之间关系的报道结果不一:国际上关于素食饮食模式与全因和特定原因死亡之间关系的报告结果不一:方法:这项前瞻性研究使用了 "基督复临安息日会健康研究-2 "队列中的数据:这项前瞻性研究使用了 "基督复临安息日会健康研究-2 "队列中的数据。研究确定了从 2002-2007 年研究基线到 2015 年随访期间的死亡率。研究人员在基线时使用经过验证的定量食物频率调查问卷收集饮食数据,然后将其分为五种饮食模式:荤食、半荤食、蔬食、乳荤素食和素食。主要结果和测量方法包括使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型和竞争风险方法得出的全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率:分析样本包括 88400 名参与者,随访时间为 971424 人年。由于许多危险比(HR)与年龄有关,我们报告了 65 岁和 85 岁时的估计结果。与荤食者相比,素食者的死亡风险较低(65 岁时的 HR 值和 95% 置信区间 - 95% CI;括号内为 85 岁时的相同值),包括总体死亡风险(0.89[0.83,0.95];0.98[0.91,1.04])、肾功能衰竭死亡风险(0.52[0.38,0.70];0.65[0.55,0.76])、传染病(0.57[0.40,0.82];0.90[0.70,1.17])、糖尿病(0.51[0.33,0.78];0.69[0.53,0.88])、选择性心脏病(0.75[0.65,0.87];0.89[0.83,0.95])和缺血性心脏病(0.730.59,0.90];0.84[0.75,0.94])。据观察,素食者、乳素食者和生态素食者的总死亡率和几种类似的特定死因的死亡率也较低。然而,在老年素食者(估计年龄为 85 岁)中观察到较高的特定病因神经系统死亡率,特别是中风(HR=1.17[1.02,1.33])、痴呆(HR=1.13[1.00,1.27])和帕金森病(HR=1.37[0.98,1.91])。黑人受试者的素食/非素食比较结果基本遵循相同的趋势,但由于人数较少,HR 值不够精确:结论:素食与较低的全因死亡风险和许多特定原因死亡风险有关,尤其是男性和年轻受试者。然而,在老年素食者中,中风和痴呆症的风险较高。这些结果需要进一步的支持和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Metabolomics signatures of sweetened beverages and added sugar are related to anthropometric measures of adiposity in young individuals: results from a cohort study. Childhood Nutritional Factors and Cardiometabolic Outcomes at 9-11 y of Age: Findings from the ROLO Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study. Perceptions and preferences for environmentally sustainable food and associated factors: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey of United States consumers. Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Navigating complex nutritional challenges after bariatric surgery: malnutrition, multiple nutrient deficiencies, and gastrointestinal dysfunction in pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1