A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/pace.15055
Naiara Calvo, Carlos Rubén López-Perales, Teresa Olóriz, Francisco Díaz-Cortegana, Beatriz Jáuregui, Nina Soto, Pilar Rodríguez, Eva Santamaría, M Rosario Ortas, Antonio Asso
{"title":"A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation.","authors":"Naiara Calvo, Carlos Rubén López-Perales, Teresa Olóriz, Francisco Díaz-Cortegana, Beatriz Jáuregui, Nina Soto, Pilar Rodríguez, Eva Santamaría, M Rosario Ortas, Antonio Asso","doi":"10.1111/pace.15055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were included (52 ± 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 ± 3 vs. 25.7 ± 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 ± 35Ω vs. 86. ± 23Ω, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 ± 33Ω vs. 87 ± 24Ω, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94Ω to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Objective: To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation.

Methods: Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance.

Results: Sixty patients were included (52 ± 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r2 = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 ± 3 vs. 25.7 ± 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 ± 35Ω vs. 86. ± 23Ω, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 ± 33Ω vs. 87 ± 24Ω, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94Ω to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%).

Conclusion: LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工同步低能量冲击阻抗作为皮下 ICD 植入过程中成功除颤测试的预测指标。
背景:指南建议在植入皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)时进行除颤测试(DFT)。植入位置、患者特征和设备因素(如冲击阻抗)会影响除颤的成功率。为了评估电击阻抗,可以进行手动同步 10J 电击(低能量同步电击 [LESS]),而无需诱发心室颤动(VF):比较 LESS 和 DFT 阻抗值,评估 LESS 阻抗对预测 S-ICD 植入过程中 DFT 成功的诊断准确性:方法:纳入连续的 S-ICD 植入术。通过配对 t 检验比较冲击阻抗。进行单变量分析以研究与成功 DFT 相关的因素。通过逻辑回归评估了基于 LESS 阻抗的 DFT 成功预测模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、ROC 曲线下面积和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验来评估 LESS 阻抗的准确性:共纳入 60 名患者(52 ± 14 岁;69% 为男性)。LESS 阻抗值和 DFT 阻抗值高度相关(r2 = 0.97,p 结论:LESS 阻抗值与 DFT 阻抗值之间的相关性很高:无需诱导 VF 的 LESS 阻抗值可以在术中预测 DFT 是否成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Coronary Spasm Due to Pulsed Field Ablation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Recalled But Responsive: Easier Extraction of Recalled Leads. Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion: Beware the Left Atrial Appendage Isolation. Changes in QRS morphology during antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Exercise-induced type 1 Brugada pattern in a child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1