Grassland biomass allocation across continents and grazing practices and its response to climate and altitude

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110176
Jianjun Cao , Yumei Li , Asim Biswas , Nicholas M. Holden , Jan F. Adamowski , Fengchu Wang , Shuyan Hong , Yanyan Qin
{"title":"Grassland biomass allocation across continents and grazing practices and its response to climate and altitude","authors":"Jianjun Cao ,&nbsp;Yumei Li ,&nbsp;Asim Biswas ,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Holden ,&nbsp;Jan F. Adamowski ,&nbsp;Fengchu Wang ,&nbsp;Shuyan Hong ,&nbsp;Yanyan Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biomass allocation in grasslands is key to understanding plant response to environmental changes and grazing management. Yet, global studies on how this split between above-ground and below-ground biomass varies across continents and grazing practices are notably scarce. We employ a comprehensive field-oriented grassland database to examine differences in total net primary productivity (TNPP), above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), below-ground net primary productivity (BNPP), and the BNPP to ANPP ratio across continents and between grazed and non-grazed grasslands. Oceania showed the greatest ANPP (916 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Asia had the lowest (192 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). BNPP values were similar among Oceania, Africa, and Asia (∼600 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding those in Europe (289 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>) and North America (408 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). South America, Africa, and Oceania had the highest TNPP (around 1418 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> to 1466 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Europe had the lowest TNPP (344 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). The BNPP to ANPP ratio was highest in South America (4.17) and Asia (3.46). Global differences in TNPP and BNPP between grazed and non-grazed grasslands were minimal, but ANPP (169 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> and 198 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) and the BNPP to ANPP ratio (4.87 and 2.40, respectively) differed significantly. Across continents and grazing practices, climate had a greater role in regulating grassland biomass allocation than altitude, and warming may have a more detrimental impact on grazed grasslands than non-grazed grasslands. Distinct biomass allocation trends under various continental and grazing conditions exert effects on the economic and ecological functions of grasslands. Our study underscores the need for balanced grassland utilization strategies at a global scale. This involves optimizing grazing in high ANPP grasslands and protecting those with significant BNPP, thereby contributing to a sustainable and ecologically sound use of grasslands in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomass allocation in grasslands is key to understanding plant response to environmental changes and grazing management. Yet, global studies on how this split between above-ground and below-ground biomass varies across continents and grazing practices are notably scarce. We employ a comprehensive field-oriented grassland database to examine differences in total net primary productivity (TNPP), above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), below-ground net primary productivity (BNPP), and the BNPP to ANPP ratio across continents and between grazed and non-grazed grasslands. Oceania showed the greatest ANPP (916 g·m−2·a−1), while Asia had the lowest (192 g·m−2·a−1). BNPP values were similar among Oceania, Africa, and Asia (∼600 g·m−2·a−1), significantly exceeding those in Europe (289 g·m−2·a−1) and North America (408 g·m−2·a−1). South America, Africa, and Oceania had the highest TNPP (around 1418 g·m−2·a−1 to 1466 g·m−2·a−1), while Europe had the lowest TNPP (344 g·m−2·a−1). The BNPP to ANPP ratio was highest in South America (4.17) and Asia (3.46). Global differences in TNPP and BNPP between grazed and non-grazed grasslands were minimal, but ANPP (169 g·m−2·a−1 and 198 g·m−2·a−1, respectively) and the BNPP to ANPP ratio (4.87 and 2.40, respectively) differed significantly. Across continents and grazing practices, climate had a greater role in regulating grassland biomass allocation than altitude, and warming may have a more detrimental impact on grazed grasslands than non-grazed grasslands. Distinct biomass allocation trends under various continental and grazing conditions exert effects on the economic and ecological functions of grasslands. Our study underscores the need for balanced grassland utilization strategies at a global scale. This involves optimizing grazing in high ANPP grasslands and protecting those with significant BNPP, thereby contributing to a sustainable and ecologically sound use of grasslands in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各大洲的草地生物量分配、放牧方式及其对气候和海拔的影响
草地的生物量分配是了解植物对环境变化和放牧管理的反应的关键。然而,关于地上生物量和地下生物量之间的分配在不同大洲和不同放牧方式下如何变化的全球性研究却非常稀少。我们利用一个面向野外的综合草地数据库,研究了各大洲以及放牧草地和非放牧草地在总净初级生产力(TNPP)、地上净初级生产力(ANPP)、地下净初级生产力(BNPP)以及BNPP与ANPP比率方面的差异。大洋洲的净初级生产力最高(916 克/平方米-年),而亚洲最低(192 克/平方米-年)。大洋洲、非洲和亚洲的 BNPP 值相似(∼600 g-m-a),明显高于欧洲(289 g-m-a)和北美洲(408 g-m-a)。南美洲、非洲和大洋洲的 TNPP 最高(约为 1418 g-m-a 至 1466 g-m-a),而欧洲的 TNPP 最低(344 g-m-a)。BNPP 与 ANPP 的比率在南美洲(4.17)和亚洲(3.46)最高。全球放牧草地和非放牧草地的TNPP和BNPP差异很小,但ANPP(分别为169 g-m-a和198 g-m-a)和BNPP与ANPP之比(分别为4.87和2.40)差异很大。从各大洲和放牧方式来看,气候对草原生物量分配的调节作用大于海拔,气候变暖对放牧草原的不利影响可能大于非放牧草原。在不同的大陆和放牧条件下,不同的生物量分配趋势会对草原的经济和生态功能产生影响。我们的研究强调了在全球范围内平衡草地利用战略的必要性。这包括优化高ANPP草地的放牧,同时保护具有显著BNPP的草地,从而促进未来草地的可持续和生态合理利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Coexistence of vascular plants and biocrusts under changing climates and their influence on ecosystem carbon fluxes Assessment of non-stationary tree growth responses in the forest-tundra and southern taiga of central Siberia Biometeorological feedbacks on peatlands: Raising the water table to reduce meteorologically-related stress on cattle Flowering seasonality and airborne pollen recent trends in Sierra de las Nieves, the southernmost National Park in continental Spain Contrasting performance of panel and time-series data models for subnational crop forecasting in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1