Feasibility of online psychosocial interventions to promote mental health recovery and well-being.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Social Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1177/00207640241264656
Peanchanan Leah, Wachara Riewpaiboon, Issavara Sirirungruang, Paranee Visuttipun
{"title":"Feasibility of online psychosocial interventions to promote mental health recovery and well-being.","authors":"Peanchanan Leah, Wachara Riewpaiboon, Issavara Sirirungruang, Paranee Visuttipun","doi":"10.1177/00207640241264656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amid the increasing trend and huge impact of mental illness, psychosocial support (PSS) has been asserted to support individuals' recovery. Unfortunately, about 80% of affected people cannot access care as needed. Meanwhile, digital technology has a considerable role in closing service gaps.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This convergent parallel mixed methods study examines existing mental health service utilization, users' needs for PSS, and feasibility of online PSS development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional interview survey was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire at a super tertiary psychiatric hospital in Thailand from March to May 2023, with three groups of service users, having self-perceived conditions/diagnosis of schizophrenia (<i>n</i> = 100), mood disorders (<i>n</i> = 84), and others including alcohol and substance use, anxiety and personality disorders (<i>n</i> = 52). Four focus group discussions with three user groups (<i>n</i> = 16) and one multidisciplinary provider group (<i>n</i> = 7) were parallelly executed. Quantitative and qualitative data were convergently analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and thematic and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Critical shortcomings of PSS were indicated by 75.8% of user participants. Six common types of self-determined PSS were psychoeducational program, support group, skills training, counseling, supported employment, and complimentary therapy. While psychoeducational program was feasible, support group, and counseling were possibly featured within the 'all-at-once' online intervention development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSS development based on users' needs can promote clinical and personal recovery outcomes, and close the service gaps. Users with mood disorders have the potential for online interventions. Peer-provider formalization, co-production approach, community engagement, digital literacy, infrastructures, and equal access factors are crucial for sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241264656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amid the increasing trend and huge impact of mental illness, psychosocial support (PSS) has been asserted to support individuals' recovery. Unfortunately, about 80% of affected people cannot access care as needed. Meanwhile, digital technology has a considerable role in closing service gaps.

Aims: This convergent parallel mixed methods study examines existing mental health service utilization, users' needs for PSS, and feasibility of online PSS development.

Methods: A cross-sectional interview survey was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire at a super tertiary psychiatric hospital in Thailand from March to May 2023, with three groups of service users, having self-perceived conditions/diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 100), mood disorders (n = 84), and others including alcohol and substance use, anxiety and personality disorders (n = 52). Four focus group discussions with three user groups (n = 16) and one multidisciplinary provider group (n = 7) were parallelly executed. Quantitative and qualitative data were convergently analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and thematic and content analysis.

Results: Critical shortcomings of PSS were indicated by 75.8% of user participants. Six common types of self-determined PSS were psychoeducational program, support group, skills training, counseling, supported employment, and complimentary therapy. While psychoeducational program was feasible, support group, and counseling were possibly featured within the 'all-at-once' online intervention development.

Conclusions: PSS development based on users' needs can promote clinical and personal recovery outcomes, and close the service gaps. Users with mood disorders have the potential for online interventions. Peer-provider formalization, co-production approach, community engagement, digital literacy, infrastructures, and equal access factors are crucial for sustainable development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线心理干预促进心理健康恢复和幸福的可行性。
背景:在精神疾病日益增长的趋势和巨大影响下,心理社会支持(PSS)被认为可以帮助个人康复。遗憾的是,约 80% 的患者无法获得所需的护理。同时,数字技术在缩小服务差距方面发挥着相当大的作用。目的:这项融合平行混合方法研究探讨了现有心理健康服务的使用情况、用户对心理支持服务的需求以及在线心理支持服务开发的可行性:方法:2023 年 3 月至 5 月,我们在泰国一家超级三级精神病医院使用半结构式问卷对三组服务用户进行了横断面访谈调查,这三组用户的自我感觉状况/诊断为精神分裂症(n = 100)、情绪障碍(n = 84)以及其他包括酒精和药物使用、焦虑和人格障碍(n = 52)。同时还与三个用户群体(n = 16)和一个多学科提供者群体(n = 7)进行了四次焦点小组讨论。使用描述性和推论性统计以及主题和内容分析对定量和定性数据进行了综合分析:结果:75.8%的用户指出了 PSS 的关键缺陷。六种常见的自我决定 PSS 类型是心理教育计划、支持小组、技能培训、咨询、辅助就业和辅助疗法。虽然心理教育计划是可行的,但支持小组和心理咨询可能是 "一次性 "在线干预发展的特色:结论:根据用户需求开发心理健康服务可以促进临床和个人康复效果,缩小服务差距。患有情绪障碍的用户具有在线干预的潜力。朋辈提供者的正规化、共同生产方式、社区参与、数字扫盲、基础设施和平等获取等因素对于可持续发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Occupational Therapy in Severe Mental Illness-A Recovery Model Approach from a Tertiary care Centre in South India. Discontinuity of psychiatric care among patients with bipolar disorder in the Netherlands. Factors predicting employment status among persons with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study from Chennai, India. Suicidal behaviors among high school graduates with preexisting mental health problems: A machine learning and GIS-based study. Suicide among adolescents in Brazil in times of pandemic: A perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1