Fully Automated Deep Learning Model to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.232635
Jason C Cai, Hirotsugu Nakai, Shiba Kuanar, Adam T Froemming, Candice W Bolan, Akira Kawashima, Hiroaki Takahashi, Lance A Mynderse, Chandler D Dora, Mitchell R Humphreys, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Pouria Rouzrokh, Alexander K Bratt, Gian Marco Conte, Bradley J Erickson, Naoki Takahashi
{"title":"Fully Automated Deep Learning Model to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI.","authors":"Jason C Cai, Hirotsugu Nakai, Shiba Kuanar, Adam T Froemming, Candice W Bolan, Akira Kawashima, Hiroaki Takahashi, Lance A Mynderse, Chandler D Dora, Mitchell R Humphreys, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Pouria Rouzrokh, Alexander K Bratt, Gian Marco Conte, Bradley J Erickson, Naoki Takahashi","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Multiparametric MRI can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥7) but is limited by reader experience and interobserver variability. In contrast, deep learning (DL) produces deterministic outputs. Purpose To develop a DL model to predict the presence of csPCa by using patient-level labels without information about tumor location and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods Data from patients without known csPCa who underwent MRI from January 2017 to December 2019 at one of multiple sites of a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. A convolutional neural network was trained to predict csPCa from T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. The reference standard was pathologic diagnosis. Radiologist performance was evaluated as follows: Radiology reports were used for the internal test set, and four radiologists' PI-RADS ratings were used for the external (ProstateX) test set. The performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the DeLong test. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAMs) were used to show tumor localization. Results Among 5735 examinations in 5215 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; all male), 1514 examinations (1454 patients) showed csPCa. In the internal test set (400 examinations), the AUC was 0.89 and 0.89 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (<i>P</i> = .88). In the external test set (204 examinations), the AUC was 0.86 and 0.84 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (<i>P</i> = .68). DL classifier plus radiologists had an AUC of 0.89 (<i>P</i> < .001). Grad-CAMs demonstrated activation over the csPCa lesion in 35 of 38 and 56 of 58 true-positive examinations in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusion The performance of a DL model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of csPCa at MRI, and Grad-CAMs localized the tumor. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Johnson and Chandarana in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232635","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Multiparametric MRI can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score ≥7) but is limited by reader experience and interobserver variability. In contrast, deep learning (DL) produces deterministic outputs. Purpose To develop a DL model to predict the presence of csPCa by using patient-level labels without information about tumor location and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods Data from patients without known csPCa who underwent MRI from January 2017 to December 2019 at one of multiple sites of a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. A convolutional neural network was trained to predict csPCa from T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. The reference standard was pathologic diagnosis. Radiologist performance was evaluated as follows: Radiology reports were used for the internal test set, and four radiologists' PI-RADS ratings were used for the external (ProstateX) test set. The performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the DeLong test. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAMs) were used to show tumor localization. Results Among 5735 examinations in 5215 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; all male), 1514 examinations (1454 patients) showed csPCa. In the internal test set (400 examinations), the AUC was 0.89 and 0.89 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .88). In the external test set (204 examinations), the AUC was 0.86 and 0.84 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .68). DL classifier plus radiologists had an AUC of 0.89 (P < .001). Grad-CAMs demonstrated activation over the csPCa lesion in 35 of 38 and 56 of 58 true-positive examinations in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusion The performance of a DL model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of csPCa at MRI, and Grad-CAMs localized the tumor. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Johnson and Chandarana in this issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全自动深度学习模型在核磁共振成像中检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
背景 多参数磁共振成像有助于识别有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)(格里森评分≥7 分),但受限于读者经验和观察者之间的差异。相比之下,深度学习(DL)能产生确定性输出。目的 开发一种深度学习模型,通过使用患者级别的标签预测 csPCa 的存在,但不包含肿瘤位置信息,并将其性能与放射科医生的性能进行比较。材料和方法 回顾性审查了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在一家学术机构的多个地点之一接受磁共振成像检查的无已知 csPCa 患者的数据。通过训练卷积神经网络,从 T2 加权图像、弥散加权图像、表观弥散系数图和 T1 加权对比增强图像预测 csPCa。参考标准是病理诊断。放射科医生的工作表现评估如下:内部测试集使用放射科报告,外部(ProstateX)测试集使用四位放射科医生的 PI-RADS 评级。使用接收器操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和 DeLong 检验对性能进行比较。梯度加权类激活图(Grad-CAM)用于显示肿瘤定位。结果 在对 5215 名患者(平均年龄为 66 岁 ± 8 [SD];均为男性)进行的 5735 次检查中,有 1514 次检查(1454 名患者)发现了 csPCa。在内部测试集(400 次检查)中,DL 分类器和放射科医生的 AUC 分别为 0.89 和 0.89(P = 0.88)。在外部测试集(204 次检查)中,DL 分类器和放射科医生的 AUC 分别为 0.86 和 0.84(P = .68)。DL 分类器加上放射科医生的 AUC 为 0.89(P < .001)。在内部和外部测试集中,Grad-CAM 分别在 38 次和 58 次真阳性检查中的 35 次和 56 次中显示出 csPCa 病灶的激活。结论 DL 模型在核磁共振成像中检测 csPCa 的性能与放射科医生无异,Grad-CAM 可定位肿瘤。RSNA, 2024 这篇文章有补充材料。另请参阅本期 Johnson 和 Chandarana 的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Amplifying Research in Radiology: The Podcast Effect. Amplifying Research: The Potential for Podcasts to Boost Radiology Journal Article Exposure. Automated Interstitial Lung Abnormality Probability Prediction at CT: A Stepwise Machine Learning Approach in the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Biomarkers for Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Moving Forward. Calcified Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1