首页 > 最新文献

Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Multiparametric MRI for Bladder Cancer: A Practical Approach to the Clinical Application of VI-RADS. 膀胱癌的多参数 MRI:VI-RADS 临床应用的实用方法》。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233459
Martina Pecoraro, Stefano Cipollari, Emanuele Messina, Ludovica Laschena, Ailin Dehghanpour, Antonella Borrelli, Francesco Del Giudice, Valdair Francisco Muglia, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Valeria Panebianco

Multiparametric MRI of the bladder is highly accurate in the detection and local staging of bladder cancer. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scoring system has improved the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of bladder MRI in the assessment of the invasion of the muscularis propria. There are several technical details concerning bladder MRI that need to be strictly applied to obtain the highest possible diagnostic potential from the MRI. In addition, image evaluation, accurate interpretation, and reporting need to be standardized to optimize diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement. This review describes the patient population for bladder MRI and discusses, with a practical approach, the correct acquisition protocol for optimal image quality using VI-RADS with reporting tips, pitfalls, and challenges for its clinical application. This review also discusses the latest evidence, clinical implications, current controversies, and future challenges, including gaps in knowledge, of the VI-RADS scoring system.

{"title":"Multiparametric MRI for Bladder Cancer: A Practical Approach to the Clinical Application of VI-RADS.","authors":"Martina Pecoraro, Stefano Cipollari, Emanuele Messina, Ludovica Laschena, Ailin Dehghanpour, Antonella Borrelli, Francesco Del Giudice, Valdair Francisco Muglia, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Valeria Panebianco","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiparametric MRI of the bladder is highly accurate in the detection and local staging of bladder cancer. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scoring system has improved the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of bladder MRI in the assessment of the invasion of the muscularis propria. There are several technical details concerning bladder MRI that need to be strictly applied to obtain the highest possible diagnostic potential from the MRI. In addition, image evaluation, accurate interpretation, and reporting need to be standardized to optimize diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement. This review describes the patient population for bladder MRI and discusses, with a practical approach, the correct acquisition protocol for optimal image quality using VI-RADS with reporting tips, pitfalls, and challenges for its clinical application. This review also discusses the latest evidence, clinical implications, current controversies, and future challenges, including gaps in knowledge, of the VI-RADS scoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e233459"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editor's Note 2024: The Year in Review for Radiology.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250376
Linda Moy
{"title":"Editor's Note 2024: The Year in Review for <i>Radiology</i>.","authors":"Linda Moy","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250376","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e250376"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143656884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the Future: A Deep Learning Model for Accurate Detection of Adrenal Nodules.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250387
Ashkan A Malayeri, Baris Turkbey
{"title":"Unveiling the Future: A Deep Learning Model for Accurate Detection of Adrenal Nodules.","authors":"Ashkan A Malayeri, Baris Turkbey","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250387","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e250387"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiologists Were Wrong to Mistrust the Machines.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250402
Lars J Grimm
{"title":"Radiologists Were Wrong to Mistrust the Machines.","authors":"Lars J Grimm","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250402","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e250402"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143658178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Staging Low-Grade Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250135
Amy M Fowler
{"title":"<sup>18</sup>F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Staging Low-Grade Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Amy M Fowler","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250135","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e250135"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Low-Energy Imaging with or without Supplemental Whole-Breast US in Breast Cancer Detection.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.242006
Joao V Horvat, Tali Amir, Gordon P Watt, Christopher E Comstock, Noam Nissan, Maxine S Jochelson, Janice S Sung

Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging modality that generates low-energy (LE) images that are visually equivalent to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and recombined images that show lesion vascularity such as MRI. Supplemental whole-breast US increases cancer detection rates when performed with FFDM but not with MRI. Purpose To compare the performance of CEM, LE images, and LE images supplemented with whole-breast US in breast cancer detection during screening. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited female participants from December 2014 to February 2019 who were scheduled for screening mammography and whole-breast US. CEM (including LE images and recombined images) and whole-breast US images were interpreted by separate breast radiologists blinded to the findings on images from the other modality. Statistical differences in sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and abnormal interpretation rate were assessed. Biopsy recommendation rate and PPVs of biopsies performed (PPV3) were calculated at the lesion level. Results Across 468 participants (median age, 54 years [IQR, 48-59 years]; all female participants), nine screen-detected cancers were diagnosed in eight participants: one cancer was depicted at LE imaging alone (cancer detection rate, 2.1 of 1000), four were depicted at LE imaging with whole-breast US (cancer detection rate, 8.5 of 1000), and eight were depicted at CEM (cancer detection rate, 17.1 of 1000; P < .05). The abnormal interpretation rate was 10.3% (48 of 468) for LE images, 13.7% (64 of 468) for LE images with whole-breast US, and 18.6% (87 of 468) for CEM (P < .001). The biopsy recommendation rate was 15.0 of 1000 for LE images, 38.4 of 1000 for LE images with whole-breast US, and 42.7 of 1000 for CEM. Seven biopsies were recommended based on LE images (PPV3 of one of seven [14.3%]), 18 biopsies based on LE images with whole-breast US (with a PPV3 of five of 18 [27.8%]), and 20 biopsies based on CEM (PPV3 of 9 of 20 [45.0%]). Conclusion Breast cancer detection improved with CEM compared with LE images alone or LE images with whole-breast US. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02310698 © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

{"title":"Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Low-Energy Imaging with or without Supplemental Whole-Breast US in Breast Cancer Detection.","authors":"Joao V Horvat, Tali Amir, Gordon P Watt, Christopher E Comstock, Noam Nissan, Maxine S Jochelson, Janice S Sung","doi":"10.1148/radiol.242006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.242006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging modality that generates low-energy (LE) images that are visually equivalent to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and recombined images that show lesion vascularity such as MRI. Supplemental whole-breast US increases cancer detection rates when performed with FFDM but not with MRI. Purpose To compare the performance of CEM, LE images, and LE images supplemented with whole-breast US in breast cancer detection during screening. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited female participants from December 2014 to February 2019 who were scheduled for screening mammography and whole-breast US. CEM (including LE images and recombined images) and whole-breast US images were interpreted by separate breast radiologists blinded to the findings on images from the other modality. Statistical differences in sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and abnormal interpretation rate were assessed. Biopsy recommendation rate and PPVs of biopsies performed (PPV<sub>3</sub>) were calculated at the lesion level. Results Across 468 participants (median age, 54 years [IQR, 48-59 years]; all female participants), nine screen-detected cancers were diagnosed in eight participants: one cancer was depicted at LE imaging alone (cancer detection rate, 2.1 of 1000), four were depicted at LE imaging with whole-breast US (cancer detection rate, 8.5 of 1000), and eight were depicted at CEM (cancer detection rate, 17.1 of 1000; <i>P</i> < .05). The abnormal interpretation rate was 10.3% (48 of 468) for LE images, 13.7% (64 of 468) for LE images with whole-breast US, and 18.6% (87 of 468) for CEM (<i>P</i> < .001). The biopsy recommendation rate was 15.0 of 1000 for LE images, 38.4 of 1000 for LE images with whole-breast US, and 42.7 of 1000 for CEM. Seven biopsies were recommended based on LE images (PPV<sub>3</sub> of one of seven [14.3%]), 18 biopsies based on LE images with whole-breast US (with a PPV<sub>3</sub> of five of 18 [27.8%]), and 20 biopsies based on CEM (PPV<sub>3</sub> of 9 of 20 [45.0%]). Conclusion Breast cancer detection improved with CEM compared with LE images alone or LE images with whole-breast US. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02310698 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e242006"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Harnessing the Power of Generative AI to Enhance Radiologist Efficiency and Accuracy.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250339
Paul S Babyn, Scott J Adams
{"title":"Harnessing the Power of Generative AI to Enhance Radiologist Efficiency and Accuracy.","authors":"Paul S Babyn, Scott J Adams","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250339","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e250339"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240450
Sunyoung Lee, Ja Kyung Yoon, Jaeseung Shin, Hyejung Shin, Anum Aslam, Aya Kamaya, Shuchi K Rodgers, Claude B Sirlin, Victoria Chernyak

Background The US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) includes an assessment category (US-1, negative; US-2, subthreshold; and US-3, positive) and a visualization score reflecting image quality (VIS-A, no or minimal limitations; VIS-B, moderate limitations; and VIS-C, severe limitations). The US-3 and VIS-C impact patient treatment. Purpose To establish the distributions of categories and visualization scores, estimate the proportions of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy in the US-3 category, and identify variables associated with the VIS-C score by conducting a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods A systematic search of articles published between January 1, 2017, and September 17, 2023, identified studies reporting distributions of US LI-RADS version 2017 categories or visualization scores. Characteristics of the study design, patient cohorts, and outcomes of interest (distributions of US categories and visualization scores, percentages of probable or definite HCC and malignancy in US-3 category, and variables associated with VIS-C) were extracted. For the meta-analysis, estimates were established with random-effects models. Results Fifteen studies comprising 39 166 US examinations were included. Of all examinations, 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8, 91.8) were categorized US-1; 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8, 6.2), US-2; and 5.9% (95% CI: 4.1, 8.0), US-3. Of the US-3 examinations, 25.9% (95% CI: 17.1, 34.7) had probable or definite HCC and 26.4% (95% CI: 18.4, 34.5) had overall malignancy. Among all examinations, 59.7% (95% CI: 46.9, 67.8) were assigned VIS-A; 32.5% (95% CI: 21.9, 41.6), VIS-B; and 7.8% (95% CI: 2.8, 14.3), VIS-C. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI: 1.57, 3.59), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.64, 3.06), and Child-Pugh B or C (OR, 2.41; 95% CI: 1.43, 4.06) were associated with VIS-C score. Conclusion Overall, 90% of surveillance US results were negative (US-1), and 92% were of adequate quality (VIS-A or VIS-B); 26% of patients with US-3 results had HCC. VIS-C was associated with obesity, NAFLD, and cirrhosis. Systemic review registry no. CRD42022384925 © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

{"title":"US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sunyoung Lee, Ja Kyung Yoon, Jaeseung Shin, Hyejung Shin, Anum Aslam, Aya Kamaya, Shuchi K Rodgers, Claude B Sirlin, Victoria Chernyak","doi":"10.1148/radiol.240450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240450","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) includes an assessment category (US-1, negative; US-2, subthreshold; and US-3, positive) and a visualization score reflecting image quality (VIS-A, no or minimal limitations; VIS-B, moderate limitations; and VIS-C, severe limitations). The US-3 and VIS-C impact patient treatment. Purpose To establish the distributions of categories and visualization scores, estimate the proportions of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy in the US-3 category, and identify variables associated with the VIS-C score by conducting a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods A systematic search of articles published between January 1, 2017, and September 17, 2023, identified studies reporting distributions of US LI-RADS version 2017 categories or visualization scores. Characteristics of the study design, patient cohorts, and outcomes of interest (distributions of US categories and visualization scores, percentages of probable or definite HCC and malignancy in US-3 category, and variables associated with VIS-C) were extracted. For the meta-analysis, estimates were established with random-effects models. Results Fifteen studies comprising 39 166 US examinations were included. Of all examinations, 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8, 91.8) were categorized US-1; 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8, 6.2), US-2; and 5.9% (95% CI: 4.1, 8.0), US-3. Of the US-3 examinations, 25.9% (95% CI: 17.1, 34.7) had probable or definite HCC and 26.4% (95% CI: 18.4, 34.5) had overall malignancy. Among all examinations, 59.7% (95% CI: 46.9, 67.8) were assigned VIS-A; 32.5% (95% CI: 21.9, 41.6), VIS-B; and 7.8% (95% CI: 2.8, 14.3), VIS-C. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI: 1.57, 3.59), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.64, 3.06), and Child-Pugh B or C (OR, 2.41; 95% CI: 1.43, 4.06) were associated with VIS-C score. Conclusion Overall, 90% of surveillance US results were negative (US-1), and 92% were of adequate quality (VIS-A or VIS-B); 26% of patients with US-3 results had HCC. VIS-C was associated with obesity, NAFLD, and cirrhosis. Systemic review registry no. CRD42022384925 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e240450"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral Nerve Imaging: MR Neurography versus High-Resolution US. 周围神经成像:磁共振神经成像与高分辨率 US。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.242775
Swati Deshmukh

"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.

{"title":"Peripheral Nerve Imaging: MR Neurography versus High-Resolution US.","authors":"Swati Deshmukh","doi":"10.1148/radiol.242775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.242775","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\u0000 <i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i>\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e242775"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Photon-counting CT-derived Quantification of Hepatic Fat Fraction: A Clinical Validation Study.
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241677
Tatjana Dell, Narine Mesropyan, Yannik Layer, Verena Tischler, Leonie Weinhold, Johannes Chang, Christian Jansen, Bernhard Schmidt, Markus Jürgens, Alexander Isaak, Patrick Kupczyk, Claus Christian Pieper, Carsten Meyer, Julian Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting

Background Steatosis is a critical health problem, creating a growing need for opportunistic screening. Early detection may allow for effective treatment and prevention of further liver complications. Purpose To evaluate photon-counting CT (PCCT) fat quantification on contrast-enhanced scans and validate the results against fat quantification via histopathologic assessment, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) from transient elastography, and MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational clinical study, PCCT-derived fat fraction quantification was assessed in participants with known or suspected liver disease. Participants underwent PCCT between February 2022 and January 2024. Participants also underwent biopsy, US with CAP measurement, or MRI with a PDFF sequence for hepatic fat fraction quantification. Liver fat fraction was measured on virtual noncontrast PCCT images using spectral processing software with a three-material decomposition algorithm for fat, liver tissue, and iodine. Steatosis was graded for each modality. Correlation between PCCT-based steatosis grades and biopsy- and CAP-based grades was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF measurements was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal PCCT fat fraction threshold for distinguishing between participants with and those without steatosis. Results The study included 178 participants, of whom 27 (mean age, 60.7 years ± 15.2 [SD]; 18 male participants) underwent liver biopsy, 26 (mean age, 60.0 years ± 18.3; 15 male participants) underwent CAP measurement, and 125 (mean age, 61.2 years ± 13.1; 70 male participants) underwent MRI PDFF measurement. There was excellent agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF assessment of liver fat fraction (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]). In stratified analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.93) in participants with known fibrosis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) in participants without fibrosis. There was moderate correlation of PCCT-based steatosis grade with histologic (ρ = 0.65) and CAP-based (ρ = 0.45) steatosis grade. Based on the Youden index, the PCCT fat fraction threshold that best discriminated between participants with and those without steatosis was 4.8%, with a maximum achievable sensitivity of 81% (38 of 47) and a specificity of 71% (55 of 78). Conclusion PCCT in a standard clinical setting allowed for accurate estimation of liver fat fraction compared with MRI PDFF-based reference standard measurements. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kartalis and Grigoriadis in this issue.

{"title":"Photon-counting CT-derived Quantification of Hepatic Fat Fraction: A Clinical Validation Study.","authors":"Tatjana Dell, Narine Mesropyan, Yannik Layer, Verena Tischler, Leonie Weinhold, Johannes Chang, Christian Jansen, Bernhard Schmidt, Markus Jürgens, Alexander Isaak, Patrick Kupczyk, Claus Christian Pieper, Carsten Meyer, Julian Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Steatosis is a critical health problem, creating a growing need for opportunistic screening. Early detection may allow for effective treatment and prevention of further liver complications. Purpose To evaluate photon-counting CT (PCCT) fat quantification on contrast-enhanced scans and validate the results against fat quantification via histopathologic assessment, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) from transient elastography, and MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational clinical study, PCCT-derived fat fraction quantification was assessed in participants with known or suspected liver disease. Participants underwent PCCT between February 2022 and January 2024. Participants also underwent biopsy, US with CAP measurement, or MRI with a PDFF sequence for hepatic fat fraction quantification. Liver fat fraction was measured on virtual noncontrast PCCT images using spectral processing software with a three-material decomposition algorithm for fat, liver tissue, and iodine. Steatosis was graded for each modality. Correlation between PCCT-based steatosis grades and biopsy- and CAP-based grades was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF measurements was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal PCCT fat fraction threshold for distinguishing between participants with and those without steatosis. Results The study included 178 participants, of whom 27 (mean age, 60.7 years ± 15.2 [SD]; 18 male participants) underwent liver biopsy, 26 (mean age, 60.0 years ± 18.3; 15 male participants) underwent CAP measurement, and 125 (mean age, 61.2 years ± 13.1; 70 male participants) underwent MRI PDFF measurement. There was excellent agreement between PCCT and MRI PDFF assessment of liver fat fraction (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]). In stratified analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.93) in participants with known fibrosis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) in participants without fibrosis. There was moderate correlation of PCCT-based steatosis grade with histologic (ρ = 0.65) and CAP-based (ρ = 0.45) steatosis grade. Based on the Youden index, the PCCT fat fraction threshold that best discriminated between participants with and those without steatosis was 4.8%, with a maximum achievable sensitivity of 81% (38 of 47) and a specificity of 71% (55 of 78). Conclusion PCCT in a standard clinical setting allowed for accurate estimation of liver fat fraction compared with MRI PDFF-based reference standard measurements. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Kartalis and Grigoriadis in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e241677"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143658176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1