The reliability and validity of Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) among Chinese adolescents.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1186/s41155-024-00314-1
Weishi Xie, Mengxuan Wang, Linya Wang, Li Yang, Min Luo
{"title":"The reliability and validity of Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) among Chinese adolescents.","authors":"Weishi Xie, Mengxuan Wang, Linya Wang, Li Yang, Min Luo","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00314-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) in a group of Chinese adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1138 adolescents (15.24 ± 1.17 years old) were tested with the Chinese version of CPV-Q, Parent-Adolescent Conflict Scale, and Adolescent Aggressive Behavior Scale of which 201 adolescents were retested 1 month later. The Chinese version of CPV-Q contains psychological, physical, financial, and control/domain factors with 14 items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-factor model has good main fit indicators (father: χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 3.28, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06; mother: χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 3.30, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06); the scale has good criterion-related validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients of the Chinese version of CPV-Q were 0.89 (father) and 0.88 (mother), and the Cronbach's α coefficients of the four subscales were 0.81 ~ 0.84 (father) and 0.76 ~ 0.85 (mother). The test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of CPV-Q was 0.85 (father) and 0.83 (mother), and the test-retest reliability of the four subscales was 0.80 ~ 0.83 (father) and 0.75 ~ 0.84 (mother).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Therefore, the CPV-Q has good reliability and validity for Chinese adolescents and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate Chinese adolescents' violence toward their parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00314-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) in a group of Chinese adolescents.

Methods: A total of 1138 adolescents (15.24 ± 1.17 years old) were tested with the Chinese version of CPV-Q, Parent-Adolescent Conflict Scale, and Adolescent Aggressive Behavior Scale of which 201 adolescents were retested 1 month later. The Chinese version of CPV-Q contains psychological, physical, financial, and control/domain factors with 14 items.

Results: The four-factor model has good main fit indicators (father: χ2/df = 3.28, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06; mother: χ2/df = 3.30, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06); the scale has good criterion-related validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients of the Chinese version of CPV-Q were 0.89 (father) and 0.88 (mother), and the Cronbach's α coefficients of the four subscales were 0.81 ~ 0.84 (father) and 0.76 ~ 0.85 (mother). The test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of CPV-Q was 0.85 (father) and 0.83 (mother), and the test-retest reliability of the four subscales was 0.80 ~ 0.83 (father) and 0.75 ~ 0.84 (mother).

Conclusion: Therefore, the CPV-Q has good reliability and validity for Chinese adolescents and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate Chinese adolescents' violence toward their parents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国青少年 "子女对父母暴力问卷"(CPV-Q)的信度和效度。
目的:在中国青少年中测试中文版子女对父母暴力问卷(CPV-Q)的信度和效度:在中国青少年中测试中文版儿童对父母暴力问卷(CPV-Q)的信度和效度:共有 1138 名青少年(15.24 ± 1.17 岁)接受了中文版 CPV-Q、父母与青少年冲突量表和青少年攻击行为量表的测试,其中 201 名青少年在一个月后接受了复测。中文版 CPV-Q 包含心理、生理、经济和控制/领域因子,共 14 个项目:四因素模型的主要拟合指标良好(父亲:χ2/df = 3.28,CFI = 0.96,RMSEA = 0.06;母亲:χ2/df = 3.30,CFI = 0.96,RMSEA = 0.06);量表具有良好的标准相关效度。中文版 CPV-Q 的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.89(父亲)和 0.88(母亲),四个分量表的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.81 ~ 0.84(父亲)和 0.76 ~ 0.85(母亲)。中文版 CPV-Q 的重测信度为 0.85(父亲)和 0.83(母亲),四个分量表的重测信度为 0.80 ~ 0.83(父亲)和 0.75 ~ 0.84(母亲):因此,CPV-Q 对中国青少年具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估中国青少年对父母暴力的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
The celebrity effect on gaze following in older and young adults. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the cancer survivors' self-efficacy scale. Psychological assessment in school contexts: ethical issues and practical guidelines. School-based intervention for anxiety using group cognitive behavior therapy in Pakistan: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. The reliability and validity of Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) among Chinese adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1