Changing the conversation: Empowering community pharmacists to address pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102202
Darius Ramrattan , Danielle Nagy , Dean Eurich, Christine Hughes, Darren Lau, Scot Simpson
{"title":"Changing the conversation: Empowering community pharmacists to address pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy","authors":"Darius Ramrattan ,&nbsp;Danielle Nagy ,&nbsp;Dean Eurich,&nbsp;Christine Hughes,&nbsp;Darren Lau,&nbsp;Scot Simpson","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for everyone 65 years of age and older, only 58% of Canadians in this age group have been vaccinated, well below the Public Health Agency of Canada’s target of 80%. To improve uptake, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention was developed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This prespecified sub-study aimed to uncover and quantify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy by exploring the nature of patient-pharmacist conversations about pneumococcal vaccine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Beginning each month (April– August 2023), participating pharmacies were randomly selected to receive an education package designed to enhance pharmacists’ knowledge, skills, and abilities in promoting pneumococcal vaccination. Pharmacists provided usual care (control stage) until they received the educational package and transitioned to the intervention stage. Weekly scorecards tracked patient-pharmacist conversations about pneumococcal vaccination. Chi-squared tests compared time taken for each conversation and patient-reported reason(s) for refusal between control and intervention stages.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen pharmacies from across Alberta were included in the analysis, reporting 656 patient-pharmacist conversations (control stage n = 271, intervention stage n = 385). Time taken for pneumococcal vaccine conversations decreased after pharmacies received the education package (65% of conversations resulting in vaccination took &lt;20 minutes in the control stage, compared to 88% in the intervention stage (<em>P</em> = 0.004)). The most common patient-reported reason for refusal, <em>needing more time to think about the vaccine</em>, remained similar between stages (<em>P</em> = 0.23). However, during the intervention stage, fewer patients refused vaccination due to <em>lack of time to receive it today</em> (<em>P</em> = 0.016) and <em>perceived lack of benefit</em> (<em>P</em> = 0.035), but more patients refused vaccination due to <em>cost barriers</em> (<em>P</em> = 0.026).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The education provided in this study changed the reasons for refusing vaccines, suggesting the nature of patient-pharmacist conversations became more efficient and informed. Similar interventions could be adopted across Canada and the United States to help combat vaccine hesitancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 102202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154431912400222X/pdfft?md5=93c6a02f31d2b824bc4ff17944f2114f&pid=1-s2.0-S154431912400222X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154431912400222X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for everyone 65 years of age and older, only 58% of Canadians in this age group have been vaccinated, well below the Public Health Agency of Canada’s target of 80%. To improve uptake, a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention was developed.

Objective

This prespecified sub-study aimed to uncover and quantify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy by exploring the nature of patient-pharmacist conversations about pneumococcal vaccine.

Methods

Beginning each month (April– August 2023), participating pharmacies were randomly selected to receive an education package designed to enhance pharmacists’ knowledge, skills, and abilities in promoting pneumococcal vaccination. Pharmacists provided usual care (control stage) until they received the educational package and transitioned to the intervention stage. Weekly scorecards tracked patient-pharmacist conversations about pneumococcal vaccination. Chi-squared tests compared time taken for each conversation and patient-reported reason(s) for refusal between control and intervention stages.

Results

Thirteen pharmacies from across Alberta were included in the analysis, reporting 656 patient-pharmacist conversations (control stage n = 271, intervention stage n = 385). Time taken for pneumococcal vaccine conversations decreased after pharmacies received the education package (65% of conversations resulting in vaccination took <20 minutes in the control stage, compared to 88% in the intervention stage (P = 0.004)). The most common patient-reported reason for refusal, needing more time to think about the vaccine, remained similar between stages (P = 0.23). However, during the intervention stage, fewer patients refused vaccination due to lack of time to receive it today (P = 0.016) and perceived lack of benefit (P = 0.035), but more patients refused vaccination due to cost barriers (P = 0.026).

Conclusion

The education provided in this study changed the reasons for refusing vaccines, suggesting the nature of patient-pharmacist conversations became more efficient and informed. Similar interventions could be adopted across Canada and the United States to help combat vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变对话:让社区药剂师有能力解决肺炎球菌疫苗接种犹豫不决的问题。
背景:虽然建议 65 岁及以上的老人都接种肺炎球菌疫苗,但只有 58% 的这个年龄段的加拿大人接种了疫苗,远远低于加拿大公共卫生局设定的 80% 的目标。为了提高接种率,我们开展了一项阶梯式分组随机试验,测试社区药剂师干预措施的有效性:这项预先指定的子研究旨在通过探索患者与药剂师之间关于肺炎球菌疫苗的对话性质,发现并量化导致疫苗接种犹豫的因素:从每个月开始(2023 年 4 月至 8 月),参与研究的药房被随机选中接受旨在提高药剂师促进肺炎球菌疫苗接种的知识、技能和能力的教育包。药剂师提供常规护理(对照阶段),直到他们接受教育包并过渡到干预阶段。每周记分卡跟踪患者与药剂师关于肺炎球菌疫苗接种的对话。通过卡方检验比较了对照阶段和干预阶段每次谈话所花费的时间以及患者报告的拒绝原因:来自艾伯塔省各地的 13 家药房参与了分析,共报告了 656 次患者与药剂师对话(控制阶段 n=271,干预阶段 n=385)。药房接受教育包后,肺炎球菌疫苗接种谈话所需的时间缩短了(65% 的谈话导致了疫苗接种):本研究中提供的教育改变了拒绝接种疫苗的原因,表明患者与药剂师对话的性质变得更加有效和知情。类似的干预措施可在加拿大和美国各地采用,以帮助消除疫苗接种犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Telemedicine-led Heart Failure Medication Regimen Optimization Clinic in Medically Underserved Heart Failure Populations. Exploring the pharmacist role in insomnia management and care provision: A scoping review. Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Older Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors Related to Patient Characteristics and Initial Opioid Dispensed. Pharmacists Enhance National Security through Medical Countermeasure Program Leadership. Barriers to and Facilitators of Buprenorphine Dispensing for Opioid Use Disorder: Evidence from Focus Groups in Appalachian Kentucky.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1