Representing Albania in the Travel Writing and Political Commentary of Edith Durham and Aubrey Herbert during the Albanian Path to Independence, c. 1904–1923

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1177/02656914241258906
Ross Cameron
{"title":"Representing Albania in the Travel Writing and Political Commentary of Edith Durham and Aubrey Herbert during the Albanian Path to Independence, c. 1904–1923","authors":"Ross Cameron","doi":"10.1177/02656914241258906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent imagological scholarship about the Balkans has revised the Balkanism thesis by examining the sympathetic lens through which British liberals viewed the peninsula's Christian and Slavic nationalities following the 1903 establishment of the Balkan Committee. Revisionist historiography has, however, overlooked how non-Christian and non-Slavic communities were represented in Britain beyond overgeneralized orientalist stereotypes of ‘the villainous Turk’. This article aims to correct this imbalance by examining representations of Albania in the travel writing and political commentary of Mary Edith Durham and Aubrey Nigel Henry Molyneux Herbert, Britain's most notable supporters of Albania's national movement in the early twentieth century, who came to sympathize with the country because of their own peripheral position in relation to the British cultural and political mainstream, by virtue of gender and an unfashionably conservative worldview. Focusing on their published travel writing and political commentary between the 1904 publication of Durham's first narrative, Through the Lands of the Serb, and Herbert's untimely death in 1923, this article proposes that they articulated a counter-discourse to liberal writing on south-eastern Europe and that their representations of Albania foregrounded the capacity for self-governance, in contrast to the cultural chaos attributed to the country by liberals.","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European History Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656914241258906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent imagological scholarship about the Balkans has revised the Balkanism thesis by examining the sympathetic lens through which British liberals viewed the peninsula's Christian and Slavic nationalities following the 1903 establishment of the Balkan Committee. Revisionist historiography has, however, overlooked how non-Christian and non-Slavic communities were represented in Britain beyond overgeneralized orientalist stereotypes of ‘the villainous Turk’. This article aims to correct this imbalance by examining representations of Albania in the travel writing and political commentary of Mary Edith Durham and Aubrey Nigel Henry Molyneux Herbert, Britain's most notable supporters of Albania's national movement in the early twentieth century, who came to sympathize with the country because of their own peripheral position in relation to the British cultural and political mainstream, by virtue of gender and an unfashionably conservative worldview. Focusing on their published travel writing and political commentary between the 1904 publication of Durham's first narrative, Through the Lands of the Serb, and Herbert's untimely death in 1923, this article proposes that they articulated a counter-discourse to liberal writing on south-eastern Europe and that their representations of Albania foregrounded the capacity for self-governance, in contrast to the cultural chaos attributed to the country by liberals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊迪丝-达勒姆和奥布里-赫伯特在阿尔巴尼亚独立道路上的游记和政治评论中表现阿尔巴尼亚,约 1904-1923 年
最近关于巴尔干的想象学研究通过考察英国自由主义者在 1903 年巴尔干委员会成立后以同情的视角看待半岛上的基督教和斯拉夫民族,对巴尔干主义论进行了修正。然而,修正主义史学忽略了非基督教和非斯拉夫族群在英国的表现形式,而不是过度笼统的东方主义 "恶棍土耳其人 "的刻板印象。本文旨在通过研究玛丽-伊迪丝-达勒姆(Mary Edith Durham)和奥布里-奈杰尔-亨利-莫利纽克斯-赫伯特(Aubrey Nigel Henry Molyneux Herbert)在游记和政治评论中对阿尔巴尼亚的表述来纠正这种不平衡。从 1904 年杜伦的第一部叙事作品《穿越塞族的土地》出版到赫伯特于 1923 年英年早逝,这篇文章以他们发表的游记和政治评论为重点,提出他们对东南欧的自由主义写作提出了反驳,他们对阿尔巴尼亚的描述突出了自治能力,与自由主义者赋予该国的文化混乱形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European History Quarterly has earned an international reputation as an essential resource on European history, publishing articles by eminent historians on a range of subjects from the later Middle Ages to post-1945. European History Quarterly also features review articles by leading authorities, offering a comprehensive survey of recent literature in a particular field, as well as an extensive book review section, enabling you to keep up to date with what"s being published in your field. The journal also features historiographical essays.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Behind the Wall: My Brother, My Family and Hatred in East Germany by Ines Geipel Book Review: The Maker of Pedigrees: Jakob Wilhelm Imhoff and the Meanings of Modern Genealogy in Early Modern Europe by Markus Friedrich Book Review: Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution by Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, eds Book Review: Ensnared between Hitler and Stalin: Refugee Scientists in the USSR by David Zimmerman Book Review: A Badge of Injury: The Pink Triangle as Global Symbol of Memory by Sébastien Tremblay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1