Comparison of antigenicity between frozen section vs non-frozen section tissue blocks: An immunohistochemical study of antibodies commonly used in gynecologic pathology.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae080
Quratulain Obaid, Mehrdad Nadji, Matthew Schlumbrecht, Andre Pinto
{"title":"Comparison of antigenicity between frozen section vs non-frozen section tissue blocks: An immunohistochemical study of antibodies commonly used in gynecologic pathology.","authors":"Quratulain Obaid, Mehrdad Nadji, Matthew Schlumbrecht, Andre Pinto","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frozen section (FS) is a technique widely used intraoperatively to render a preliminary histopathologic diagnosis, allowing for immediate decisions at the time of surgery. We aimed to investigate potential variations in tissue antigenicity induced by rapid freezing in a variety of gynecologic tumor samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 177 FS and 177 non-frozen section (NFS) tissue slides were tested using a panel of immunostains commonly used in gynecologic pathology, including hormone receptors (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), HER2, mismatch repair proteins (MSH6, PMS2), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), p53, napsin A, and ɑ-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase. Immunohistochemistry results were categorized as positive or negative, and positive cases were subsequently scored based on the distribution and intensity of the staining. Certain immunostains, such as HER2, PD-L1, and p53, were scored according to the established guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall concordance between FS and NFS blocks was 87%; among the 13% of discrepant cases, most (10.7%) were classified as minor, with only quantitative differences without foreseeable clinical significance. In 2.3% of cases, there were major qualitative changes with potential impact on disease management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that FS tissue blocks may, in most cases, safely be used for immunohistochemical studies because most discrepant cases showed only minor differences in staining, with no anticipated clinical significance. Nevertheless, for certain markers, including HER2, p53, and PMS2, a NFS block is preferred when that option is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Frozen section (FS) is a technique widely used intraoperatively to render a preliminary histopathologic diagnosis, allowing for immediate decisions at the time of surgery. We aimed to investigate potential variations in tissue antigenicity induced by rapid freezing in a variety of gynecologic tumor samples.

Methods: A total of 177 FS and 177 non-frozen section (NFS) tissue slides were tested using a panel of immunostains commonly used in gynecologic pathology, including hormone receptors (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), HER2, mismatch repair proteins (MSH6, PMS2), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), p53, napsin A, and ɑ-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase. Immunohistochemistry results were categorized as positive or negative, and positive cases were subsequently scored based on the distribution and intensity of the staining. Certain immunostains, such as HER2, PD-L1, and p53, were scored according to the established guidelines.

Results: The overall concordance between FS and NFS blocks was 87%; among the 13% of discrepant cases, most (10.7%) were classified as minor, with only quantitative differences without foreseeable clinical significance. In 2.3% of cases, there were major qualitative changes with potential impact on disease management.

Conclusions: We concluded that FS tissue blocks may, in most cases, safely be used for immunohistochemical studies because most discrepant cases showed only minor differences in staining, with no anticipated clinical significance. Nevertheless, for certain markers, including HER2, p53, and PMS2, a NFS block is preferred when that option is available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷冻切片与非冷冻切片组织块抗原性的比较:妇科病理学常用抗体的免疫组化研究。
目的:冷冻切片(FS)是术中广泛使用的一种技术,可提供初步的组织病理学诊断,以便在手术时立即做出决定。我们旨在研究快速冷冻各种妇科肿瘤样本可能引起的组织抗原性变化:方法:使用妇科病理学常用的一组免疫标记,包括激素受体(雌激素受体、孕激素受体)、HER2、错配修复蛋白(MSH6、PMS2)、程序性细胞死亡 1 配体 1 (PD-L1)、p53、napsin A 和 ɑ-甲基乙酰辅酶-A 消旋酶,对 177 张 FS 和 177 张非冷冻切片(NFS)组织切片进行了检测。免疫组化结果分为阳性和阴性,阳性病例随后根据染色的分布和强度进行评分。某些免疫标记,如HER2、PD-L1和p53,则根据既定指南进行评分:FS和NFS区块的总体一致性为87%;在13%的差异病例中,大多数(10.7%)被归类为轻微差异,只有数量上的差异,没有可预见的临床意义。在 2.3% 的病例中,存在对疾病管理有潜在影响的重大质变:我们的结论是,在大多数情况下,FS 组织块可安全地用于免疫组化研究,因为大多数差异病例的染色仅表现为轻微差异,没有预期的临床意义。不过,对于某些标记物,包括 HER2、p53 和 PMS2,如果可以选择 NFS 组织块,则应首选 NFS 组织块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1