Effect of time of day on outcomes in elective surgery: a systematic review.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/anae.16395
Arjen J G Meewisse, Annerixt Gribnau, Steven E Thiessen, Dirk Jan Stenvers, Jeroen Hermanides, Mark L van Zuylen
{"title":"Effect of time of day on outcomes in elective surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Arjen J G Meewisse, Annerixt Gribnau, Steven E Thiessen, Dirk Jan Stenvers, Jeroen Hermanides, Mark L van Zuylen","doi":"10.1111/anae.16395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timing of elective surgery could affect clinical outcome because of diurnal rhythms of patient physiology as well as surgical team performance. Waiting times for elective surgery are increasing in many countries, leading to increasing interest in undertaking elective surgery in the evening or at night. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the effect of the timing of elective (but not urgent or emergency) surgery on mortality, morbidity and other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched databases for relevant studies combining the terms 'circadian rhythm' and 'anaesthesia/surgery'. Additional relevant articles were found by hand-searching the references. All studies were screened for bias. Included studies examined daytime vs. evening/night-time surgery, morning vs. afternoon surgery, multiple timeslots or used time as a continuous variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study and one randomised controlled trial were included (n = 798,914). Evening/night-time elective surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality when compared with daytime procedures in three studies (n = 611,230), with odds ratios (95%CI) for mortality ranging from 1.35 (1.16-1.56) to 3.98 (1.54-10.30), while no differences were found in three other studies (n = 142,355). No differences were found for morning vs. afternoon surgery (four studies, n = 3277). However, most studies had a low quality of evidence due to their retrospective nature and because not all studies corrected for patient characteristics. Moreover, the studies were heterogeneous in terms of the reported time slots and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that evening/night-time elective surgery is associated with a higher risk of mortality compared with daytime surgery. However, the quality of evidence was graded as low, and thus, future prospective research should publish individual patient data and standardise outcome measures to allow firm conclusions and facilitate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The timing of elective surgery could affect clinical outcome because of diurnal rhythms of patient physiology as well as surgical team performance. Waiting times for elective surgery are increasing in many countries, leading to increasing interest in undertaking elective surgery in the evening or at night. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the effect of the timing of elective (but not urgent or emergency) surgery on mortality, morbidity and other clinical outcomes.

Methods: We searched databases for relevant studies combining the terms 'circadian rhythm' and 'anaesthesia/surgery'. Additional relevant articles were found by hand-searching the references. All studies were screened for bias. Included studies examined daytime vs. evening/night-time surgery, morning vs. afternoon surgery, multiple timeslots or used time as a continuous variable.

Results: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study and one randomised controlled trial were included (n = 798,914). Evening/night-time elective surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality when compared with daytime procedures in three studies (n = 611,230), with odds ratios (95%CI) for mortality ranging from 1.35 (1.16-1.56) to 3.98 (1.54-10.30), while no differences were found in three other studies (n = 142,355). No differences were found for morning vs. afternoon surgery (four studies, n = 3277). However, most studies had a low quality of evidence due to their retrospective nature and because not all studies corrected for patient characteristics. Moreover, the studies were heterogeneous in terms of the reported time slots and clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: We found that evening/night-time elective surgery is associated with a higher risk of mortality compared with daytime surgery. However, the quality of evidence was graded as low, and thus, future prospective research should publish individual patient data and standardise outcome measures to allow firm conclusions and facilitate interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间对择期手术结果的影响:系统性综述。
背景:择期手术的时间可能会影响临床结果,因为病人的生理周期和手术团队的表现都与昼夜节律有关。在许多国家,择期手术的等待时间越来越长,因此人们越来越倾向于在傍晚或夜间进行择期手术。我们的目的是系统地回顾有关择期(而非紧急或急诊)手术时间对死亡率、发病率和其他临床结果影响的文献:我们在数据库中搜索了以 "昼夜节律 "和 "麻醉/手术 "为关键词的相关研究。通过人工搜索参考文献找到了其他相关文章。对所有研究进行了偏倚筛选。纳入的研究对白天与傍晚/夜间手术、上午与下午手术、多个时间段或将时间作为连续变量进行了研究:结果:共纳入 19 项回顾性队列研究、1 项前瞻性队列研究和 1 项随机对照试验(n=798,914)。在三项研究(n = 611,230 人)中,晚间/夜间择期手术与白天手术相比死亡率风险更高,死亡率的几率比(95%CI)从 1.35(1.16-1.56)到 3.98(1.54-10.30)不等,而在另外三项研究(n = 142,355 人)中未发现差异。上午手术与下午手术没有发现差异(四项研究,n = 3277)。然而,由于大多数研究都是回顾性的,而且并非所有研究都对患者特征进行了校正,因此证据质量较低。此外,这些研究在报告的时间段和临床结果方面也不尽相同:我们发现,与日间手术相比,晚间/夜间择期手术与较高的死亡风险相关。然而,证据的质量被评为低级,因此,未来的前瞻性研究应公布患者的个体数据并对结果测量进行标准化,以便得出可靠的结论并促进干预措施的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a reply Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery Screening of patients at risk of postoperative delirium using specific neuropsychological testing Usability comparison scoring of video and direct laryngoscopes: a reply Prognostic clinical prediction models for acute post-surgical pain in adults: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1