Validating respiratory sarcopenia diagnostic criteria by mortality based on a position paper by four professional organizations: Insights from the Otassha study

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics & Gerontology International Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/ggi.14937
Takeshi Kera, Hisashi Kawai, Manami Ejiri, Keigo Imamura, Hirohiko Hirano, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Kazushige Ihara, Shuichi Obuchi
{"title":"Validating respiratory sarcopenia diagnostic criteria by mortality based on a position paper by four professional organizations: Insights from the Otassha study","authors":"Takeshi Kera,&nbsp;Hisashi Kawai,&nbsp;Manami Ejiri,&nbsp;Keigo Imamura,&nbsp;Hirohiko Hirano,&nbsp;Yoshinori Fujiwara,&nbsp;Kazushige Ihara,&nbsp;Shuichi Obuchi","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The Japanese Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty, Japanese Society of Respiratory Physical Therapy, and Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Nutrition proposed the definition and diagnosis of respiratory sarcopenia using low respiratory muscle strength and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM; ASM/height<sup>2</sup>) instead of respiratory muscle mass; however, these parameters have not been validated. This study aimed to confirm the validity of the respiratory sarcopenia definition proposed by these four professional organizations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants of our cohort study in 2015 of 468 community-dwelling older people who were evaluated for sarcopenia and underwent spirometry were included in this analysis. We determined two respiratory sarcopenia models based on low skeletal muscle mass and respiratory muscle strength. Low skeletal muscle mass was defined by low ASM/height<sup>2</sup>, and low respiratory muscle strength was defined by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or percentage of predicted PEFR (%PEFR). Survival status was assessed 5 years after baseline assessment (in 2020). To evaluate the validity of the cut-off values for PEFR and %PEFR, we determined different respiratory sarcopenia models by sequentially varying the cut-off values for each parameter, including ASM/height<sup>2</sup>, from high to low. We subsequently calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for each respiratory sarcopenia model using the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, we plotted the HR for each combination of cut-off values for ASM/height<sup>2</sup> and PEFR or %PEFR on a three-dimensional chart to observe the relationship between the different cut-off values and HR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 31 people died during the 5-year observation period. With ASM/height<sup>2</sup> cut-off values of approximately 7.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for men and 5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for women and %PEFR cut-off values of 66–75%, respiratory sarcopenia was associated with mortality risk (HR, 2.36–3.27, point estimation range).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The definition of respiratory sarcopenia by the four professional organizations is related to future health outcomes, and this definition is valid. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 948–953</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"24 9","pages":"948-953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The Japanese Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty, Japanese Society of Respiratory Physical Therapy, and Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Nutrition proposed the definition and diagnosis of respiratory sarcopenia using low respiratory muscle strength and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM; ASM/height2) instead of respiratory muscle mass; however, these parameters have not been validated. This study aimed to confirm the validity of the respiratory sarcopenia definition proposed by these four professional organizations.

Methods

Participants of our cohort study in 2015 of 468 community-dwelling older people who were evaluated for sarcopenia and underwent spirometry were included in this analysis. We determined two respiratory sarcopenia models based on low skeletal muscle mass and respiratory muscle strength. Low skeletal muscle mass was defined by low ASM/height2, and low respiratory muscle strength was defined by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or percentage of predicted PEFR (%PEFR). Survival status was assessed 5 years after baseline assessment (in 2020). To evaluate the validity of the cut-off values for PEFR and %PEFR, we determined different respiratory sarcopenia models by sequentially varying the cut-off values for each parameter, including ASM/height2, from high to low. We subsequently calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for each respiratory sarcopenia model using the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, we plotted the HR for each combination of cut-off values for ASM/height2 and PEFR or %PEFR on a three-dimensional chart to observe the relationship between the different cut-off values and HR.

Results

A total of 31 people died during the 5-year observation period. With ASM/height2 cut-off values of approximately 7.0 kg/m2 for men and 5.7 kg/m2 for women and %PEFR cut-off values of 66–75%, respiratory sarcopenia was associated with mortality risk (HR, 2.36–3.27, point estimation range).

Conclusions

The definition of respiratory sarcopenia by the four professional organizations is related to future health outcomes, and this definition is valid. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 948–953.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据四个专业组织的立场文件,按死亡率验证呼吸道肌肉疏松症诊断标准:奥塔沙研究的启示。
目的:日本呼吸护理与康复学会、日本肌肉疏松症与虚弱症协会、日本呼吸理疗学会和日本康复营养学会提出了呼吸肌疏松症的定义和诊断方法,即使用低呼吸肌力量和附属骨骼肌质量(ASM;ASM/身高2)代替呼吸肌质量;然而,这些参数尚未得到验证。本研究旨在确认这四个专业组织提出的呼吸肌疏松症定义的有效性:我们在 2015 年对 468 名居住在社区的老年人进行了队列研究,并对他们进行了肌肉疏松症评估和肺活量测定。我们根据低骨骼肌质量和呼吸肌强度确定了两种呼吸肌疏松症模型。低骨骼肌质量的定义是低 ASM/身高2,低呼吸肌强度的定义是呼气峰流速(PEFR)或预测 PEFR 的百分比(%PEFR)。在基线评估 5 年后(2020 年)对生存状况进行评估。为了评估 PEFR 和 %PEFR 临界值的有效性,我们从高到低依次改变了每个参数(包括 ASM/身高2)的临界值,从而确定了不同的呼吸系统肌肉疏松症模型。随后,我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型计算了每个呼吸系统肌肉疏松症模型的死亡率危险比 (HR)。此外,我们还将 ASM/height2 和 PEFR 或 %PEFR 的每个临界值组合的死亡率绘制成三维图表,以观察不同临界值与死亡率之间的关系:结果:在5年的观察期内,共有31人死亡。男性 ASM/height2 临界值约为 7.0 kg/m2,女性为 5.7 kg/m2,%PEFR 临界值为 66%-75%,呼吸系统肌肉疏松症与死亡风险相关(HR,2.36-3.27,点估计范围):结论:四个专业组织对呼吸肌疏松症的定义与未来的健康状况有关,而且这一定义是有效的。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; --:-----.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
期刊最新文献
Association of personality and social support with subjective well-being among Japanese older adults. Identifying determinants of physical activity in older patients with musculoskeletal disorders undergoing rehabilitation: Comparison of two distinct models using structural equation modeling. Relationship between the number of remaining teeth and postoperative delirium in patients after gastrointestinal surgery. Comment on: Association of sleep duration with obesity in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of high blood pressure on the risk of mortality among Japanese people aged 65 years and older.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1