Aim: This study aimed to investigate the associations between bed-rest time and food intake and between bed-rest time and constipation in older nursing home residents.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Long-term Care Information System for Evidence (LIFE) database. We used data collected from older nursing home residents registered in the LIFE database between April 2022 and March 2023. We compared outcome data between the short-bed-rest group (≥9 h out of bed per day) and the long-bed-rest group (<9 h out of bed per day). The outcomes were the percentage of food intake provided in the last 3 days, the percentage of energy sufficiency (the percentage of energy intake to energy requirements), and the incidence of constipation.
Results: The short-bed-rest group consisted of 265 people (53.9%). The short-bed-rest group showed a significantly higher percentage of food intake (93.1 ± 12.3 vs. 85.2 ± 21.6), a higher percentage of energy sufficiency (104.8 ± 19.4 vs. 92.2 ± 26.2), and a lower incidence of constipation (6.0% vs. 18.5%) than the long bed-rest group. Multivariable analyses revealed that shorter bed-rest time was independently and significantly associated with the percentage of food intake (standardized coefficient: 0.28, P < 0.001), the percentage of energy sufficiency (standardized coefficient 0.30, p < 0.001), and incidence of constipation (odds ratio: 0.12, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Bed-rest time is associated with food intake and constipation in older nursing home residents. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.
{"title":"Association between bed-rest time, food intake, and constipation in older nursing home residents.","authors":"Kenta Ushida, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Shoji Kinoshita, Haruka Tohara, Tokiko Isowa, Kotomi Sakai, Momoko Tohyama, Yuka Shirai, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the associations between bed-rest time and food intake and between bed-rest time and constipation in older nursing home residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Long-term Care Information System for Evidence (LIFE) database. We used data collected from older nursing home residents registered in the LIFE database between April 2022 and March 2023. We compared outcome data between the short-bed-rest group (≥9 h out of bed per day) and the long-bed-rest group (<9 h out of bed per day). The outcomes were the percentage of food intake provided in the last 3 days, the percentage of energy sufficiency (the percentage of energy intake to energy requirements), and the incidence of constipation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The short-bed-rest group consisted of 265 people (53.9%). The short-bed-rest group showed a significantly higher percentage of food intake (93.1 ± 12.3 vs. 85.2 ± 21.6), a higher percentage of energy sufficiency (104.8 ± 19.4 vs. 92.2 ± 26.2), and a lower incidence of constipation (6.0% vs. 18.5%) than the long bed-rest group. Multivariable analyses revealed that shorter bed-rest time was independently and significantly associated with the percentage of food intake (standardized coefficient: 0.28, P < 0.001), the percentage of energy sufficiency (standardized coefficient 0.30, p < 0.001), and incidence of constipation (odds ratio: 0.12, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bed-rest time is associated with food intake and constipation in older nursing home residents. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fabien Coisy, Chloé Desbrosses, Thibaut Markarian, Laura Grau-Mercier, Sarah Lavielle, Dino Tikvesa, Xavier Bobbia, Romain Genre Grandpierre
Aim: Treatment withholding or withdrawal (TWW) is frequent in the emergency department (ED). Most studies on this topic only study patients who die in the ED. The main aim of this study was to determine 30-day mortality after a TWW decision in the ED, for patients discharged alive from ED.
Methods: This was a retrospective monocentric study conducted from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022, in a university hospital in France. Classes of TWW levels were low, medium and high, corresponding to do-not-resuscitate order, treatment withholding and treatment withdrawal, respectively. The secondary aim was to determine if there were predictive factors of survival among patients with medium-level TWW.
Results: Overall, 280 patients were included and 219 (78%) were analyzed, with mean age of 82 (±12) years. Respectively, 12 (5%), 145 (66%) and 62 (28%) had a low, medium, or high level of TWW. A total of 78 (36% [95% CI, 29%-42%]) patients were alive on day 30 following their ED admission: 7 (11%) with a high level, 63 (43%) with a medium level and 8 (67%) with a low level. No difference was found after adjustment between surviving and nonsurviving patients having a medium TWW level.
Conclusions: Among patients having a TWW decision in the ED, 36% of patients were alive at 30 days. The decision to limit some therapeutics for patients does not mean an imminent death, and those patients need adequate care. The care pathway for these patients must be organized accordingly. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.
{"title":"Thirty-day survival rate of patients having a treatment withholding or treatment withdrawal decision in the emergency department: A retrospective monocentric study.","authors":"Fabien Coisy, Chloé Desbrosses, Thibaut Markarian, Laura Grau-Mercier, Sarah Lavielle, Dino Tikvesa, Xavier Bobbia, Romain Genre Grandpierre","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Treatment withholding or withdrawal (TWW) is frequent in the emergency department (ED). Most studies on this topic only study patients who die in the ED. The main aim of this study was to determine 30-day mortality after a TWW decision in the ED, for patients discharged alive from ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective monocentric study conducted from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022, in a university hospital in France. Classes of TWW levels were low, medium and high, corresponding to do-not-resuscitate order, treatment withholding and treatment withdrawal, respectively. The secondary aim was to determine if there were predictive factors of survival among patients with medium-level TWW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 280 patients were included and 219 (78%) were analyzed, with mean age of 82 (±12) years. Respectively, 12 (5%), 145 (66%) and 62 (28%) had a low, medium, or high level of TWW. A total of 78 (36% [95% CI, 29%-42%]) patients were alive on day 30 following their ED admission: 7 (11%) with a high level, 63 (43%) with a medium level and 8 (67%) with a low level. No difference was found after adjustment between surviving and nonsurviving patients having a medium TWW level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients having a TWW decision in the ED, 36% of patients were alive at 30 days. The decision to limit some therapeutics for patients does not mean an imminent death, and those patients need adequate care. The care pathway for these patients must be organized accordingly. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Relationships between elementary school children's experiences in helping older adults and their attitudes toward individuals with dementia and intention to help: A cross-sectional survey aiming to develop age-friendly education.","authors":"Ayumi Igarashi, Manami Takaoka, Hiroshige Matsumoto, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143515354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Toshitaka Sawamura, Shigehiro Karashima, Ai Ohmori, Mitsuhiro Kometani, Takashi Yoneda
Tirzepatide could control postprandial hyperglycemia even in cases with diminished β-cell function. This finding gives new insight into the treatment of older patients with diabetes. However, tilzepatide does not replace basal insulin in cases with diminished β-cell function and requires careful observation for sarcopenia.
{"title":"Impacts of tirzepatide on older patients with diminished β-cell function and dementia.","authors":"Toshitaka Sawamura, Shigehiro Karashima, Ai Ohmori, Mitsuhiro Kometani, Takashi Yoneda","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tirzepatide could control postprandial hyperglycemia even in cases with diminished β-cell function. This finding gives new insight into the treatment of older patients with diabetes. However, tilzepatide does not replace basal insulin in cases with diminished β-cell function and requires careful observation for sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143500212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reply to comment on \"Regional disparities in home health care utilization for older adults and their associated factors at the secondary medical area level: A nationwide study in Japan\".","authors":"Yu Sun, Nobuo Sakata, Masao Iwagami, Satoru Yoshie, Ryota Inokuchi, Tomoko Ito, Naoaki Kuroda, Jun Hamano, Nanako Tamiya","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143500217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Expanding perspectives on workload and emotional exhaustion among older assistant care workers: A commentary on Ma et al.","authors":"Lien-Chung Wei, Hsien-Jane Chiu","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143491708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jaya Singh Kshatri, Daisy J A Janssen, Susan D Shenkin, Asit Mansingh, Sandipana Pati, Subrata Kumar Palo, Sanghamitra Pati
<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a commonly used intervention for addressing the health needs of older people. Traditionally used for hospital inpatients, there is inconclusive evidence on its effectiveness in other settings. This overview of reviews aims to synthesize the current evidence regarding CGA models, their effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability in nonhospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The overview included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis reporting on older adults (≥50 years) undergoing CGA in primary care facilities, outpatient care, community-based programs, long-term care settings and home-based care, excluding narrow high-risk groups or specific disease conditions. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychInfo and CINAHL, were searched up to August 2023, with blinded double screening and data extraction. Review quality was assessed using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2574 identified articles, 22 systematic reviews (478 primary studies, >136 336 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Most reviews were of moderate to good quality, 73% were based in community or home settings, and in 50% of the reviews the participants were aged ≥65 years. They identified diverse CGA models without uniform definition or domains of assessment, most delivered by nurses and multidisciplinary teams, with variation of input duration (6-36 months) and poor reporting of frequency of assessment or follow-up duration. Most reviews found no effect of CGA on rates of admission to hospitals or long-term care facilities, quality of life or function. Of the 10 reviews that reported it as an outcome, only two found that CGA reduced mortality risk by 13% and 14% at longest follow-up. Of the three reviews reporting frailty as an outcome, two showed benefit, with one meta-analysis showing significant reduction in frailty (relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.93]). The acceptability of CGA is good among care providers, but limited information was found among patients. Facilitators for implementation identified include preexisting interprofessional working, skilled staff, better informed patients and focus on patient convenience. The evidence was exclusively from high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CGA models are highly heterogenous across domains, delivery, dosage and frequency. Most systematic reviews show little to no evidence of benefit of CGA on rates of hospitalization/long-term care admissions, functional ability and quality of life. However, CGA may have a positive effect on frailty and mortality, particularly in relatively vulnerable older people. Strategies to first identify high-risk individuals, followed by CGA, could lead to better outcomes. The lack of evidence on the effectiveness of CGA in low- and middle-income countries, despite the rapid increase in the number and proportion of older adu
{"title":"Comprehensive geriatric assessment in nonhospitalized settings: An overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Jaya Singh Kshatri, Daisy J A Janssen, Susan D Shenkin, Asit Mansingh, Sandipana Pati, Subrata Kumar Palo, Sanghamitra Pati","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a commonly used intervention for addressing the health needs of older people. Traditionally used for hospital inpatients, there is inconclusive evidence on its effectiveness in other settings. This overview of reviews aims to synthesize the current evidence regarding CGA models, their effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability in nonhospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The overview included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis reporting on older adults (≥50 years) undergoing CGA in primary care facilities, outpatient care, community-based programs, long-term care settings and home-based care, excluding narrow high-risk groups or specific disease conditions. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychInfo and CINAHL, were searched up to August 2023, with blinded double screening and data extraction. Review quality was assessed using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2574 identified articles, 22 systematic reviews (478 primary studies, >136 336 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Most reviews were of moderate to good quality, 73% were based in community or home settings, and in 50% of the reviews the participants were aged ≥65 years. They identified diverse CGA models without uniform definition or domains of assessment, most delivered by nurses and multidisciplinary teams, with variation of input duration (6-36 months) and poor reporting of frequency of assessment or follow-up duration. Most reviews found no effect of CGA on rates of admission to hospitals or long-term care facilities, quality of life or function. Of the 10 reviews that reported it as an outcome, only two found that CGA reduced mortality risk by 13% and 14% at longest follow-up. Of the three reviews reporting frailty as an outcome, two showed benefit, with one meta-analysis showing significant reduction in frailty (relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.93]). The acceptability of CGA is good among care providers, but limited information was found among patients. Facilitators for implementation identified include preexisting interprofessional working, skilled staff, better informed patients and focus on patient convenience. The evidence was exclusively from high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CGA models are highly heterogenous across domains, delivery, dosage and frequency. Most systematic reviews show little to no evidence of benefit of CGA on rates of hospitalization/long-term care admissions, functional ability and quality of life. However, CGA may have a positive effect on frailty and mortality, particularly in relatively vulnerable older people. Strategies to first identify high-risk individuals, followed by CGA, could lead to better outcomes. The lack of evidence on the effectiveness of CGA in low- and middle-income countries, despite the rapid increase in the number and proportion of older adu","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143467705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Merve Yilmaz Kars, Ilyas Akkar, Orhan Cicek, Zeynep Iclal Turgut, Mustafa Hakan Dogan, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoglu
{"title":"Comment on: Association between self-reported weight loss and new long-term care insurance certifications: A 9-year Japanese older adult cohort study.","authors":"Merve Yilmaz Kars, Ilyas Akkar, Orhan Cicek, Zeynep Iclal Turgut, Mustafa Hakan Dogan, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoglu","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143467698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Haroun, Mona Hegazy Mohamed, Marwa Abd El Azeem Abd El Gawad, Doha Rasheedy
Introduction: The high prevalence of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia among older adults presents a significant health care challenge, underscoring the need for effective screening tools. Given the frequent overlap of these conditions, a tool capable of simultaneously screening for all three conditions is imperative.
Methods: The development process included an extensive review of existing assessment instruments and data on risk factors, clinical presentations, and consequences of the three conditions. The tool underwent rigorous testing to evaluate its reliability and validity in a sample of 300 older adults. It was compared against standard diagnostic criteria and assessed alongside other screening tools, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia.
Results: Eighteen percent (n = 54) of participants were diagnosed with an overlap of the three conditions, 10% (n = 30) of cases presented with sarcopenia alone and 3% (n = 10) were diagnosed with malnutrition only. The new tool demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.818 and high construct validity. The newly developed tool and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the malnutrition and sarcopenia. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting cachexia, whereas the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy across all conditions. The retention criteria for items were deemed valid for the 19 items included in the finalized version of the new tool.
Conclusions: Screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults using a single tool was feasible. The new tool was easy to use and did not require anthropometric measurements or physical performance tasks. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.
{"title":"Development and validation of a new tool for simultaneous screening of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults.","authors":"Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Haroun, Mona Hegazy Mohamed, Marwa Abd El Azeem Abd El Gawad, Doha Rasheedy","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The high prevalence of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia among older adults presents a significant health care challenge, underscoring the need for effective screening tools. Given the frequent overlap of these conditions, a tool capable of simultaneously screening for all three conditions is imperative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development process included an extensive review of existing assessment instruments and data on risk factors, clinical presentations, and consequences of the three conditions. The tool underwent rigorous testing to evaluate its reliability and validity in a sample of 300 older adults. It was compared against standard diagnostic criteria and assessed alongside other screening tools, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen percent (n = 54) of participants were diagnosed with an overlap of the three conditions, 10% (n = 30) of cases presented with sarcopenia alone and 3% (n = 10) were diagnosed with malnutrition only. The new tool demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.818 and high construct validity. The newly developed tool and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the malnutrition and sarcopenia. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting cachexia, whereas the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy across all conditions. The retention criteria for items were deemed valid for the 19 items included in the finalized version of the new tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults using a single tool was feasible. The new tool was easy to use and did not require anthropometric measurements or physical performance tasks. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to the Letter to the Editor, \"Is oral frailty a cause or a consequence?\"","authors":"Masanori Iwasaki, Maki Shirobe, Keiko Motokawa, Tomoki Tanaka, Kazunori Ikebe, Takayuki Ueda, Shunsuke Minakuchi, Masahiro Akishita, Hidenori Arai, Katsuya Iijima, Hiroyuki Sasai, Shuichi Obuchi, Hirohiko Hirano","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}