Sample size calculation for mixture cure model with restricted mean survival time as a primary endpoint.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1177/09622802241265501
Zhaojin Li, Xiang Geng, Yawen Hou, Zheng Chen
{"title":"Sample size calculation for mixture cure model with restricted mean survival time as a primary endpoint.","authors":"Zhaojin Li, Xiang Geng, Yawen Hou, Zheng Chen","doi":"10.1177/09622802241265501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is not uncommon for a substantial proportion of patients to be cured (or survive long-term) in clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints, such as the endometrial cancer trial. When designing a clinical trial, a mixture cure model should be used to fully consider the cure fraction. Previously, mixture cure model sample size calculations were based on the proportional hazards assumption of latency distribution between groups, and the log-rank test was used for deriving sample size formulas. In real studies, the latency distributions of the two groups often do not satisfy the proportional hazards assumptions. This article has derived a sample size calculation formula for a mixture cure model with restricted mean survival time as the primary endpoint, and did simulation and example studies. The restricted mean survival time test is not subject to proportional hazards assumptions, and the difference in treatment effect obtained can be quantified as the number of years (or months) increased or decreased in survival time, making it very convenient for clinical patient-physician communication. The simulation results showed that the sample sizes estimated by the restricted mean survival time test for the mixture cure model were accurate regardless of whether the proportional hazards assumptions were satisfied and were smaller than the sample sizes estimated by the log-rank test in most cases for the scenarios in which the proportional hazards assumptions were violated.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1546-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241265501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is not uncommon for a substantial proportion of patients to be cured (or survive long-term) in clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints, such as the endometrial cancer trial. When designing a clinical trial, a mixture cure model should be used to fully consider the cure fraction. Previously, mixture cure model sample size calculations were based on the proportional hazards assumption of latency distribution between groups, and the log-rank test was used for deriving sample size formulas. In real studies, the latency distributions of the two groups often do not satisfy the proportional hazards assumptions. This article has derived a sample size calculation formula for a mixture cure model with restricted mean survival time as the primary endpoint, and did simulation and example studies. The restricted mean survival time test is not subject to proportional hazards assumptions, and the difference in treatment effect obtained can be quantified as the number of years (or months) increased or decreased in survival time, making it very convenient for clinical patient-physician communication. The simulation results showed that the sample sizes estimated by the restricted mean survival time test for the mixture cure model were accurate regardless of whether the proportional hazards assumptions were satisfied and were smaller than the sample sizes estimated by the log-rank test in most cases for the scenarios in which the proportional hazards assumptions were violated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以受限平均存活时间为主要终点的混合治愈模型的样本量计算。
在以时间为终点的临床试验(如子宫内膜癌试验)中,相当一部分患者被治愈(或长期存活)的情况并不少见。在设计临床试验时,应使用混合治愈模型来充分考虑治愈率。以前,混合治愈模型的样本量计算是基于组间潜伏期分布的比例危险假设,并使用对数秩检验来推导样本量公式。在实际研究中,两组的潜伏期分布往往不满足比例危险假设。本文推导了以受限平均生存时间为主要终点的混合治愈模型的样本量计算公式,并进行了模拟和实例研究。受限平均生存时间检验不受比例危险度假设的限制,获得的治疗效果差异可以量化为生存时间增加或减少的年数(或月数),非常便于临床医患交流。模拟结果表明,无论是否满足比例危险假设,混合治愈模型的受限平均生存时间检验所估计的样本量都是准确的,而且在违反比例危险假设的大多数情况下,受限平均生存时间检验所估计的样本量都小于对数秩检验所估计的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization. Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses. Testing for a treatment effect in a selected subgroup. Enhancing DHA supplementation adherence: A Bayesian approach with finite mixture models and irregular interim schedules in adaptive trial designs. Analysis of recurrent event data with spatial random effects using a Bayesian approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1