Feasibility and Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Nipple Lesions: A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbae033
Sophia R O'Brien, Damien Medrano, Julia Birnbaum, Elizabeth S McDonald, Emily F Conant, Susan P Weinstein, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Samantha P Zuckerman, Christine E Edmonds
{"title":"Feasibility and Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Nipple Lesions: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Sophia R O'Brien, Damien Medrano, Julia Birnbaum, Elizabeth S McDonald, Emily F Conant, Susan P Weinstein, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, Samantha P Zuckerman, Christine E Edmonds","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the superficial location, suspicious findings of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) are not amenable to stereotactic or MRI-guided sampling and have historically necessitated surgical biopsy or skin-punch biopsy. There are limited reports of US-guided core biopsy of the nipple (US-CBN).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report our nearly 3-year pilot experience with US-CBN at an academic breast imaging center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional review board-exempt and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed. We assessed patient demographics, breast imaging characteristics, procedural data, pathology, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine female patients aged 27 to 64 underwent US-CBN from January 2021 to October 2023. Initial imaging abnormalities included abnormal MRI enhancement, mammographic calcifications, and sonographic masses. After initial or second-look US, all imaging findings had sonographic correlates for biopsy specimens, the majority of which were sonographic masses (8/9). US-CBN was performed by 6 breast radiologists using a variety of devices. All biopsy specimen results were concordant with sonographic abnormalities, although 1 was considered discordant from the initial abnormality seen on MRI. There were no complications, and discomfort during the procedure was well-treated. Two patients (22%, 2/9) were diagnosed with malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study demonstrated that US-CBN can be performed by a breast radiologist for definitive diagnosis of suspicious nipple abnormalities seen on breast imaging, avoiding surgery, and maintaining nipple integrity. In our population, 22% (2/9) of US-CBNs revealed malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the superficial location, suspicious findings of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) are not amenable to stereotactic or MRI-guided sampling and have historically necessitated surgical biopsy or skin-punch biopsy. There are limited reports of US-guided core biopsy of the nipple (US-CBN).

Objective: We report our nearly 3-year pilot experience with US-CBN at an academic breast imaging center.

Methods: An institutional review board-exempt and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed. We assessed patient demographics, breast imaging characteristics, procedural data, pathology, and outcomes.

Results: Nine female patients aged 27 to 64 underwent US-CBN from January 2021 to October 2023. Initial imaging abnormalities included abnormal MRI enhancement, mammographic calcifications, and sonographic masses. After initial or second-look US, all imaging findings had sonographic correlates for biopsy specimens, the majority of which were sonographic masses (8/9). US-CBN was performed by 6 breast radiologists using a variety of devices. All biopsy specimen results were concordant with sonographic abnormalities, although 1 was considered discordant from the initial abnormality seen on MRI. There were no complications, and discomfort during the procedure was well-treated. Two patients (22%, 2/9) were diagnosed with malignancy.

Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that US-CBN can be performed by a breast radiologist for definitive diagnosis of suspicious nipple abnormalities seen on breast imaging, avoiding surgery, and maintaining nipple integrity. In our population, 22% (2/9) of US-CBNs revealed malignancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下乳头病变核心针活检的可行性和准确性:一项试点研究
背景:由于乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的位置较浅,立体定向或核磁共振成像引导下的取样不适合对其进行可疑检查,因此历来都需要进行手术活检或皮肤打孔活检。关于 US 引导下乳头核心活检(US-CBN)的报道很有限:我们报告了在一家学术乳腺成像中心进行 US-CBN 近 3 年的试点经验:我们进行了一项机构审查委员会豁免且符合 HIPAA 标准的回顾性审查。我们评估了患者的人口统计学特征、乳腺成像特征、手术数据、病理学和结果:从 2021 年 1 月到 2023 年 10 月,9 名年龄在 27 到 64 岁之间的女性患者接受了 US-CBN。初始成像异常包括磁共振成像异常增强、乳腺钙化和声像图肿块。在初次或第二次US检查后,所有成像结果都与活检标本的声像图相关,其中大部分是声像图肿块(8/9)。US-CBN 由 6 位乳腺放射科医生使用各种设备完成。所有活检标本结果均与声像图异常一致,但有 1 例标本被认为与最初在核磁共振成像上看到的异常不一致。没有出现并发症,手术过程中的不适也得到了很好的处理。两名患者(22%,2/9)被诊断为恶性肿瘤:这项试验性研究表明,乳腺放射科医生可以通过 US-CBN 对乳腺影像学检查中发现的可疑乳头异常进行明确诊断,避免手术,并保持乳头的完整性。在我们的研究对象中,22%(2/9)的 US-CBN 发现了恶性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Performance of Abbreviated Breast MRI in High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center. Developing a Career as a Clinician-Educator in Breast Imaging. Unknown Case: Non-mass Enhancement on Baseline MRI. Developing Financial Acumen as a Breast Imaging Radiologist. Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1