Self-perception of voice and knowledge of vocal health and hygiene in Candomblé religious leaders in Brazil.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20242023087pt
Kenya Ayo-Kianga da Silva Faustino, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau
{"title":"Self-perception of voice and knowledge of vocal health and hygiene in Candomblé religious leaders in Brazil.","authors":"Kenya Ayo-Kianga da Silva Faustino, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023087pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify possible complaints, voice and aerodigestive symptoms, singing voice handicap, and knowledge of vocal health and hygiene in Candomblé religious leaders in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised 112 individuals who filled out a questionnaire with their identification and characterization, the stratified classification of their professional activities, and their self-perception of voice. Three self-assessment protocols - VoiSS, QSHV, and MSHI - were also used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-assessment of voice ranged from average to good. VoiSS mean total score was 23.04, which is above the cutoff. QSHV mean score was 23.54 points, which is near the cutoff. MSHI mean score (the perception of singing voice handicap) was 25.66 points. There was a substantially strong positive correlation between VoiSS and MSHI total scores (0.789; p<0.001). Women had higher limitation scores (p=0.012) and total scores (p=0.012) in VoiSS and higher handicap scores (p=0.038) in MSHI. Level I professionals - vocal elite (singers and actors) - had significantly higher QSHV scores than those in levels IV (p=0.010) and V (p=0.008). Most respondents had not visited an otorhinolaryngologist (89.29%) within the last year and had not been submitted to speech therapy (83.04%) for voice complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Candomblé leaders, particularly women, perceived voice symptoms and singing voice handicaps, with no relationship with their knowledge of vocal health and hygiene. Despite the complaints, most subjects reported not having visited health professionals responsible for voice care within the last year.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"36 4","pages":"e20230087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023087pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To verify possible complaints, voice and aerodigestive symptoms, singing voice handicap, and knowledge of vocal health and hygiene in Candomblé religious leaders in Brazil.

Methods: The study comprised 112 individuals who filled out a questionnaire with their identification and characterization, the stratified classification of their professional activities, and their self-perception of voice. Three self-assessment protocols - VoiSS, QSHV, and MSHI - were also used.

Results: The self-assessment of voice ranged from average to good. VoiSS mean total score was 23.04, which is above the cutoff. QSHV mean score was 23.54 points, which is near the cutoff. MSHI mean score (the perception of singing voice handicap) was 25.66 points. There was a substantially strong positive correlation between VoiSS and MSHI total scores (0.789; p<0.001). Women had higher limitation scores (p=0.012) and total scores (p=0.012) in VoiSS and higher handicap scores (p=0.038) in MSHI. Level I professionals - vocal elite (singers and actors) - had significantly higher QSHV scores than those in levels IV (p=0.010) and V (p=0.008). Most respondents had not visited an otorhinolaryngologist (89.29%) within the last year and had not been submitted to speech therapy (83.04%) for voice complaints.

Conclusion: Candomblé leaders, particularly women, perceived voice symptoms and singing voice handicaps, with no relationship with their knowledge of vocal health and hygiene. Despite the complaints, most subjects reported not having visited health professionals responsible for voice care within the last year.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西坎东布雷宗教领袖对嗓音的自我认知以及对嗓音健康和卫生的了解。
目的:核实巴西坎东布雷宗教领袖可能存在的主诉、嗓音和气管症状、歌唱嗓音障碍以及嗓音健康和卫生知识:研究对象包括 112 人,他们填写了一份调查问卷,其中包括他们的身份和特征、职业活动的分层分类以及他们对嗓音的自我认知。研究还使用了三种自我评估方案--VoiSS、QSHV 和 MSHI:结果:对嗓音的自我评估从一般到良好不等。VoiSS 的平均总分为 23.04 分,高于临界值。QSHV 平均分为 23.54 分,接近临界值。MSHI 平均分(对歌唱嗓音障碍的感知)为 25.66 分。VoiSS 和 MSHI 的总分之间存在很强的正相关性(0.789;p):坎东布雷教领导人,尤其是妇女,认为嗓音症状和歌唱嗓音障碍与他们的嗓音健康和卫生知识没有关系。尽管有这些抱怨,但大多数受试者都表示在过去一年中没有去看负责嗓音保健的医务人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between maximum tongue pressure in healthy elderly individuals and demographic and dental characteristics. Association between older people's health literacy and sociodemographic aspects, functioning, happiness, and perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: a preliminary study. Effects of the Program for Developing Oral Communication Expressiveness on university radio announcers: a pre/post intervention study. DPOAE growth function in schoolchildren with impaired temporal ordering skills. Is there a decline in speech and swallowing in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis over ten years?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1