Changes in illness perception, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress following hand surgeon consultation: A prospective study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111861
{"title":"Changes in illness perception, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress following hand surgeon consultation: A prospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Baseline mindset factors are important factors that influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Theoretically, improving the mindset prior to treatment may improve treatment decisions and outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated changes in patients' mindset following hand surgeon consultation. Additionally, we assessed if the change in illness perception differed between surgical and nonsurgical patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The primary outcome was illness perception, measured using the total score of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ, range 0–80). Secondary outcomes were the B-IPQ subscales, pain catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), and psychological distress (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 276 patients with various hand and wrist conditions completed the mindset questionnaires before and after hand surgeon consultation (median time interval: 15 days). The B-IPQ total score improved from 39.7 (±10.6) before to 35.8 (±11.3) after consultation (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.36); scores also improved for the B-IPQ subscales Coherence, Concern, Emotional Response, Timeline, Treatment Control, and Identity and the PCS. There were no changes in the other outcomes. Surgical patients improved on the B-IPQ subscales Treatment Control and Timeline, while nonsurgical patients did not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Illness perception and pain catastrophizing improved following hand surgeon consultation, suggesting that clinicians may actively influence the patients' mindset during consultations, and that they may try to enhance this effect to improve outcomes. Furthermore, surgical patients improved more in illness perceptions, indicating that nonsurgical patients may benefit from a more targeted strategy for changing mindset.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924002733/pdfft?md5=c09473545e9b8a7eb475ae89aea30f60&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924002733-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924002733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Baseline mindset factors are important factors that influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Theoretically, improving the mindset prior to treatment may improve treatment decisions and outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated changes in patients' mindset following hand surgeon consultation. Additionally, we assessed if the change in illness perception differed between surgical and nonsurgical patients.

Methods

The primary outcome was illness perception, measured using the total score of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ, range 0–80). Secondary outcomes were the B-IPQ subscales, pain catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), and psychological distress (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4).

Results

A total of 276 patients with various hand and wrist conditions completed the mindset questionnaires before and after hand surgeon consultation (median time interval: 15 days). The B-IPQ total score improved from 39.7 (±10.6) before to 35.8 (±11.3) after consultation (p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.36); scores also improved for the B-IPQ subscales Coherence, Concern, Emotional Response, Timeline, Treatment Control, and Identity and the PCS. There were no changes in the other outcomes. Surgical patients improved on the B-IPQ subscales Treatment Control and Timeline, while nonsurgical patients did not.

Conclusions

Illness perception and pain catastrophizing improved following hand surgeon consultation, suggesting that clinicians may actively influence the patients' mindset during consultations, and that they may try to enhance this effect to improve outcomes. Furthermore, surgical patients improved more in illness perceptions, indicating that nonsurgical patients may benefit from a more targeted strategy for changing mindset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手外科医生会诊后疾病感知、疼痛灾难化和心理困扰的变化:前瞻性研究。
背景:基线心态因素是影响治疗决策和结果的重要因素。从理论上讲,改善治疗前的心态可能会改善治疗决策和治疗效果。这项前瞻性队列研究评估了手外科医生会诊后患者心态的变化。此外,我们还评估了手术和非手术患者在疾病认知方面的变化是否存在差异:主要结果是疾病感知,使用简明疾病感知问卷(B-IPQ,范围 0-80)的总分进行测量。次要结果为 B-IPQ 分量表、疼痛灾难化(使用疼痛灾难化量表 (PCS) 测量)和心理困扰(使用患者健康问卷-4 测量):共有 276 名患有各种手部和腕部疾病的患者在手外科医生会诊前后(中位时间间隔:15 天)填写了心态问卷。B-IPQ总分从就诊前的39.7(±10.6)分提高到就诊后的35.8(±11.3)分(p 结论:就诊前和就诊后患者的心态均有所改善:手外科医生会诊后,患者的疾病感知和疼痛灾难化程度均有所改善,这表明临床医生在会诊过程中可能会积极影响患者的心态,他们可以尝试加强这种影响,以改善治疗效果。此外,手术患者在疾病感知方面的改善更大,这表明非手术患者可能会受益于更有针对性的改变心态策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
期刊最新文献
Caregiving, caring intensity, and allostatic load: A comparison of caring to others inside and outside the home Childhood maltreatment, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease: A prospective study Most people do not attribute their burnout symptoms to work Unlike other medical conditions, type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for new-onset major depression after COVID-19 The role of self-efficacy and tangible support in managing depression in fibromyalgia: Expanding social support strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1