Prescribing Cascades of Loop Diuretics and Anti-vertigo Drugs Following Treatment with Gabapentinoids and Benzodiazepines: Prescription Sequence Symmetry Analysis of a Large-Scale Claims Database Including Japanese Older Adults.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s40801-024-00446-x
Rina Omata, Akane Asami, Azusa Hara, Hisashi Urushihara
{"title":"Prescribing Cascades of Loop Diuretics and Anti-vertigo Drugs Following Treatment with Gabapentinoids and Benzodiazepines: Prescription Sequence Symmetry Analysis of a Large-Scale Claims Database Including Japanese Older Adults.","authors":"Rina Omata, Akane Asami, Azusa Hara, Hisashi Urushihara","doi":"10.1007/s40801-024-00446-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentinoids (GBP) and benzodiazepines (BZ) are commonly prescribed in older adults and their package inserts list edema and vertigo as adverse drug reactions. These adverse drug reactions may be treated with symptomatic drug therapies without discontinuing the culprit drugs or decreasing their dose, thereby initiating a prescribing cascade and often resulting in polypharmacy. Whether prescribing cascades occur in the treatment of edema and dizziness among Japanese patients treated with GBP and BZ has not been investigated, including treatment with mirogabalin, a class drug of GBP marketed in Japan.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate prescribing cascades with GBP-induced and BZ-induced edema and dizziness treated with loop diuretics (LD) and anti-vertigo drugs (AVD), respectively, among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prescription sequence symmetry analysis design was used to detect signals of prescribing cascades associated with edema and dizziness induced by GBP and BZ (exposure drugs). Loop diuretics and AVD were the outcome drugs used to identify prescribing cascades following the initiation of exposure drugs. The study population consisted of enrollees of a large-scale health claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare, Inc., between April 2014 and March 2021. Subjects eligible for a prescription sequence symmetry analysis were patients aged ≥ 65 years prescribed an outcome drug within 90 days before and after exposure drug initiation. A signal of a prescribing cascade was detected if secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were statistically significant on comparison of the frequencies of outcome drug initiation before and after exposure drug initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2671 patients with prescriptions of a GBP-LD combination, 4009 with a GBP-AVD combination, 8675 with a BZ-LD combination, and 9462 with a BZ-AVD combination. The adjusted sequence ratios for GBP-LD and BZ-LD cascades were significantly larger than one (adjusted sequence ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.69 [1.56-1.83]; 1.35 [1.29-1.41], respectively), indicating positive signals of prescribing cascades. No signal was detected for the GBP-AVD or BZ-AVD cascade (0.89 [0.83-0.94]; 0.90 [0.87-0.94], respectively). The adjusted sequence ratio for the mirogabalin cascade was higher than that for pregabalin (2.23 [1.84-2.71] vs 1.59 [1.46-1.73]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides good evidence that LD-prescribing cascades associated with edema would be a class effect of GBP and BZ. Edema emerging around 1 month after GBP initiation should be carefully differentiated from pathological edema, and undue LD prescription as a prescribing cascade should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00446-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gabapentinoids (GBP) and benzodiazepines (BZ) are commonly prescribed in older adults and their package inserts list edema and vertigo as adverse drug reactions. These adverse drug reactions may be treated with symptomatic drug therapies without discontinuing the culprit drugs or decreasing their dose, thereby initiating a prescribing cascade and often resulting in polypharmacy. Whether prescribing cascades occur in the treatment of edema and dizziness among Japanese patients treated with GBP and BZ has not been investigated, including treatment with mirogabalin, a class drug of GBP marketed in Japan.

Objective: We aimed to investigate prescribing cascades with GBP-induced and BZ-induced edema and dizziness treated with loop diuretics (LD) and anti-vertigo drugs (AVD), respectively, among older adults.

Methods: A prescription sequence symmetry analysis design was used to detect signals of prescribing cascades associated with edema and dizziness induced by GBP and BZ (exposure drugs). Loop diuretics and AVD were the outcome drugs used to identify prescribing cascades following the initiation of exposure drugs. The study population consisted of enrollees of a large-scale health claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare, Inc., between April 2014 and March 2021. Subjects eligible for a prescription sequence symmetry analysis were patients aged ≥ 65 years prescribed an outcome drug within 90 days before and after exposure drug initiation. A signal of a prescribing cascade was detected if secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were statistically significant on comparison of the frequencies of outcome drug initiation before and after exposure drug initiation.

Results: We identified 2671 patients with prescriptions of a GBP-LD combination, 4009 with a GBP-AVD combination, 8675 with a BZ-LD combination, and 9462 with a BZ-AVD combination. The adjusted sequence ratios for GBP-LD and BZ-LD cascades were significantly larger than one (adjusted sequence ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.69 [1.56-1.83]; 1.35 [1.29-1.41], respectively), indicating positive signals of prescribing cascades. No signal was detected for the GBP-AVD or BZ-AVD cascade (0.89 [0.83-0.94]; 0.90 [0.87-0.94], respectively). The adjusted sequence ratio for the mirogabalin cascade was higher than that for pregabalin (2.23 [1.84-2.71] vs 1.59 [1.46-1.73]).

Conclusions: Our study provides good evidence that LD-prescribing cascades associated with edema would be a class effect of GBP and BZ. Edema emerging around 1 month after GBP initiation should be carefully differentiated from pathological edema, and undue LD prescription as a prescribing cascade should be avoided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加巴喷丁类药物和苯二氮卓类药物治疗后环形利尿剂和抗眩晕药物的处方级联:对包括日本老年人在内的大规模索赔数据库的处方序列对称性分析。
背景:加巴喷丁类药物(GBP)和苯二氮卓类药物(BZ)是老年人的常用处方药,其包装说明书将水肿和眩晕列为药物不良反应。在治疗这些药物不良反应时,可能会采用对症药物疗法,而不会停用罪魁祸首药物或减少其剂量,从而引发处方连环效应,并经常导致多重用药。在使用 GBP 和 BZ 治疗水肿和头晕的日本患者中,包括使用在日本上市的 GBP 类药物 mirogabalin 治疗的患者中,是否会出现处方连环效应尚未进行调查:我们的目的是调查在老年人中分别使用襻利尿剂(LD)和抗眩晕药(AVD)治疗 GBP 和 BZ 引起的水肿和眩晕的处方级联:方法:采用处方序列对称性分析设计来检测与GBP和BZ(暴露药物)引起的水肿和头晕相关的处方级联信号。襻利尿剂和AVD是结果药物,用于识别开始使用暴露药物后的处方级联。研究对象包括 2014 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间由 DeSC Healthcare, Inc.符合处方序列对称性分析条件的受试者是年龄≥ 65 岁的患者,他们在开始使用暴露药物前后 90 天内被处方了一种结果药物。如果经世俗趋势调整后的顺序比与开始使用暴露药物前后开始使用结果药物的频率比较具有统计学意义,则可检测到处方级联信号:结果:我们发现2671名患者处方了GBP-LD联合用药,4009名患者处方了GBP-AVD联合用药,8675名患者处方了BZ-LD联合用药,9462名患者处方了BZ-AVD联合用药。GBP-LD和BZ-LD级联的调整序列比明显大于1(调整序列比[95%置信区间]分别为1.69[1.56-1.83];1.35[1.29-1.41]),表明处方级联出现了积极信号。GBP-AVD或BZ-AVD级联未发现信号(分别为0.89 [0.83-0.94];0.90 [0.87-0.94])。米瑞巴林级联的调整序列比高于普瑞巴林(2.23 [1.84-2.71] vs 1.59 [1.46-1.73]):我们的研究提供了很好的证据,证明与水肿相关的低密度处方级联是GBP和BZ的类效应。在开始使用 GBP 后 1 个月左右出现的水肿应与病理性水肿仔细鉴别,并应避免不适当的 LD 处方级联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit. Comparison of the Safety of Aspirin Monotherapy and Aspirin and P2Y12 Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients Post Coil Embolization During Admission: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database. US Clinical Practice Experience with Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Acute Clinical Events and Healthcare Resource Utilization. Clinical Significance of Prior Ramucirumab Use on the Effectiveness of Nivolumab as the Third-Line Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Early Clinical Outcomes of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparison with First-Line or Later-Line Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1