Drugs - Real World Outcomes最新文献

Background and objective: Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-reported data, improving completeness of AE data. We explored one of these workflows in a cancer clinical trial unit.

Methods: The study was a single-site study conducted at a tertiary hospital located in Australia. Patients consenting to a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. Participants used an electronic platform-My Health My Way (MHMW)-to report their symptomatic data weekly for 24 weeks. A symptom list was included within the platform, along with a free text field. Data reported via the platform was compared with data recorded in the patient's medical chart. Time taken to compile data from each source was recorded, along with missing data points. Agreement between patient-reported data and data recorded in the medical notes was assessed using Kappa and Gwet's AC₁; time taken to compile data and missing data points were assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: Low agreement was found between patient- and clinician-reported data (- 0.482 and - 0.159 by Kappa and Gwet's AC₁ respectively). Only 127 (30%) of the total 428 AEs were reported by both MHMW and medical notes. Patients reported higher rates of symptoms from the symptom list, while clinicians reported higher rates of symptoms outside of the symptom list. Time taken to compile the data from MHMW was significantly less than that taken to review medical notes (2.19 min versus 5.73 min respectively; P <  0.001). There were significantly less missing data points from the MHMW data compared with the medical notes (1.4 versus 7.8; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study confirms previous reports that patient- and clinician-reported adverse event data show low agreement. This study also shows that clinical trial sites could significantly reduce the work performed by research staff in the collection of adverse event data by implementing an electronic, patient-reported platform.

Background and objective: The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). The ELEVATE study aimed to examine clinical-practice outcome data on eculizumab effectiveness in US adults with MG (generalized or ocular). This paper reports the findings on MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization, and the use of rescue therapy.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of US adults with MG who initiated eculizumab. Outcomes assessed for up to 2 years before and after eculizumab initiation included percentages and rates per patient per year (PPPY) of exacerbations and crises (the latter defined as intubation/impending intubation), healthcare resource utilization, and rescue therapy administration.

Results: A total of 119 patients diagnosed with MG were enrolled in the study; 92 patients had ≥ 3 months of data both before and during eculizumab therapy and were included in the analyses. The mean rate of MG exacerbations decreased from 0.385 PPPY before eculizumab initiation to 0.152 PPPY during eculizumab treatment (p = 0.0034); the mean rate of MG crises decreased from 0.411 to 0.056 PPPY (p = 0.0018). Rates of healthcare resource utilization and rescue therapy use also decreased significantly during eculizumab treatment.

Conclusions: This retrospective chart review analysis provides evidence for a beneficial impact of eculizumab treatment on the incidence of MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization in clinical practice, and on rescue therapy use. These data further support the therapeutic benefits of eculizumab in patients with MG.

Background: Some aspects regarding the use of antiplatelet agents after coil embolization for subarachnoid hemorrhage during admission remain unclear. This study used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) data to investigate the safety and prognostic effects of aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy on bleeding events.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used Japanese DPC data to assess patients who were hospitalized with subarachnoid hemorrhage and received aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 4421). The aspirin monotherapy (A group, n = 2848) and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy (AP group, n = 1573) groups were compared. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of bleeding events and proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2 at discharge, respectively. Data was analyzed using multivariable adjusted logistic regression (significance level, 5%).

Results: The adjusted odds ratio in AP group, with A group as the reference, for bleeding events and the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.75-1.26, p = 0.839) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.92-1.29, p = 0.302), respectively.

Conclusions: There are no differences in the incidence of bleeding events or good clinical outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge) between aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy.

Background and objective: Because vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition has been suggested to improve immune cell function in the cancer microenvironment, we examined whether using ramucirumab (RAM) before nivolumab usage is more effective in advanced gastric cancer.

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as the third-line regimen for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer between October 2017 and December 2022. They were divided into the RAM (RAM-treated) group and the non-RAM (non-treated) group according to the RAM usage in the second-line regimen. The primary outcome was to compare the overall survival after nivolumab administration in the third-line regimen between the RAM and non-RAM groups.

Results: Fifty-two patients were included in the present study: 42 patients in the RAM group and ten patients in the non-RAM group. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the RAM group than in the non-RAM group (8.5 months vs 6.9 months, p < 0.05). In the RAM group, patients without peritoneal metastasis had significantly better median overall survival than those with peritoneal metastasis (23.8 months vs 7.7 months, p = 0.0033). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards analyses showed that the presence of peritoneal metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.0-5.7) alone was significantly associated with overall survival in the RAM group.

Conclusions: The use of RAM prior to nivolumab monotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer, especially those without peritoneal metastasis.

Introduction: The costs associated with proper disposal, management, and regulatory compliance of controlled substances in healthcare systems are substantial. In the context of the current opioid crisis, and given the high abuse potential of controlled substances, it is imperative that waste is minimized and waste procedures are followed to ensure safe disposal of controlled substances. This study aims to quantify the costs associated with fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, midazolam, and ketamine waste in intraoperative areas through a multi-site observational analysis.

Methods: The study used an observational design across various hospital procedural and post-procedural units in the Southwest Florida region of the United States. Automated and non-automated workflows for wasting controlled substances were compared. As with a previous study conducted by Hertig et al., waste was evaluated as (1) the quantity (mg/μg) of medication disposed defined as 'pharmaceutical waste' or 'product waste' (PW); and (2) workforce time associated with the waste disposal process defined as 'workforce time waste' (WTW). Secondary measures include workforce costs associated with the waste disposal process. The product waste analysis was conducted between October and December 2023. The workforce time waste analysis was examined over a 10-day period in January and February 2024. A yearly extrapolation model was applied to cost data.

Results: The findings revealed substantial costs linked to both PW and WTW, emphasizing the financial burden of controlled substance waste. Study data validated previous literature describing the extent of fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine waste while documenting significant amounts of midazolam and ketamine waste. The combined annual waste cost for the two study hospitals was estimated at US$56,557, with workforce time accounting for 36%-50% of this total cost.

Conclusion: This study provides vital insights into the financial and operational impact of medication waste in procedural and post-procedural areas, supporting ongoing efforts to minimize waste, ensuring the safe and effective use of controlled substances. Future research should explore the impact of medication waste across diverse healthcare settings and the cost implications associated with pharmacy professionals in the waste compliance process.

Background and objective: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durva/Treme) has recently been approved as a first-line or later-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) in Japan. We assessed the real-world outcomes of Durva/Treme for u-HCC, with a focus on treatment efficacy and safety.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 22 patients with u-HCC treated with Durva/Treme at Iwate Medical University during the period from 2023 to 2024, with a comparison of the clinical outcomes between patients who received Durva/Treme as first-line and later-line treatments. We further evaluated changes in the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade during treatment.

Results: There were 10 patients in the first-line group and 12 patients in the later-line treatment group. During the follow-up with a median duration of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival (first-line versus later-line: 4.7 months versus 2.9 months, p = 0.85), the objective response rate (0.0% versus 16.7%, p = 0.48), the disease control rate (60.0% versus 58.4%, p = 1.00), and the incidence of any adverse event (50.0% versus 75.0%, p = 0.38) were not statistically different between the two groups. The changes in the mALBI scores were not statistically significant (p = 0.75).

Conclusions: Durva/Treme may be effective and safe for patients with u-HCC, even in patients who receive Durva/Treme as a later-line treatment.

Background: There is a growing interest in products featuring hemp extracts and a demand for more data regarding their safety. To date, there is a paucity of published data on the safety of these products.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of postmarketing surveillance data collected in the United States on full spectrum hemp extract (FSHE) products manufactured by Charlotte's Web (CW) was conducted over an 18-month period (January 2019 to July 2020). The frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) was assessed by analyzing AE reports against the estimated number of consumers who purchased products and the total number of products sold.

Results: During the 18-month period, approximately 646,391 consumers purchased 1,939,172 products and 431 AEs were reported by 304 individuals. The estimated percentage of consumers who reported at least one adverse event was 0.05%. The percentage of AEs per products sold was 0.02%. Most AEs (98.14%) reported were Grade 1 (i.e., asymptomatic or causing mild symptoms), as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Seven AEs were classified as serious, and the percentage of SAEs per products sold was 0.0004%. None of the reported SAEs were classified as a Grade 4 or Grade 5 (i.e., life threatening or fatal).

Conclusions: Approximately 0.05% of consumers who purchased the CW FSHE products from January 2019 to July 2020 reported an adverse event. The percentage of AEs and SAEs per products sold was 0.02% and 0.0004%, respectively. These data demonstrate that CW FSHE products appear to be well tolerated at recommended doses.

Introduction: Older people are on average more susceptible to the adverse effects of psychotropic drugs, but addressing older people as a homogenous group based on age alone can be misleading when exploring psychotropic drug use. This study aimed to describe psychotropic drug use and associated factors among community-dwelling older people who had been acutely admitted to hospital.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on a sample of 300 community-dwelling people 75 years or older who had been admitted to the acute medical ward at Umeå University Hospital at any time from September 2018 to October 2021. Data on medication use were obtained from electronic medical charts, and psychotropic drug use was presented as user proportions, both in terms of individual substances and drug classes. Associations between psychotropic drug use and factors comprising sex, age, cohabitation, comorbidities and multi-dose dispensing (MDD) of medicines were analysed through logistic regression.

Results: Approximately 50% of the individuals used at least one psychotropic drug, and 18% used two or more such medicines. Zopiclone displayed the highest user proportion of all psychotropics (18.3%), followed by mirtazapine (11.3%) and zolpidem (9.7%). Of note, zolpidem was more prevalent among the females than among the males (p = 0.006). Regarding other sex differences, 55 and 38% of the females and males, respectively, used at least one psychotropic drug (p = 0.004). A similar pattern was observed regarding sedatives and hypnotic drugs exclusively (p = 0.048). In the regression analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.05 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.22-3.42]) and MDD (adjusted OR 2.20 [95% CI 1.23-3.93]) were positively associated with psychotropic drug use.

Conclusion: The most common psychotropic drugs used by community-dwelling older people admitted to the acute medical ward were hypnotic drugs and antidepressants. Regarding patient factors, female sex and MDD system were positively associated with psychotropic drug use. Further studies concerning those two factors in relation to potential overprescribing could provide a better picture on how to optimize psychotropic drug use among acutely admitted vulnerable older people.

Background: The rapidly changing policy climate related to cannabis legalization has led to drastic changes in cannabis use in the United States (US). Medical cannabis use is increasing overall, but at a faster rate among older adults compared to other age groups.

Objective: The aim was to investigate older adults' cannabis use behaviors and attitudes around disclosing medical cannabis use to their primary healthcare providers (HCPs).

Methods: Nineteen older adults (ages 65+ years) with self-reported medical cannabis use were recruited from flyers posted in ambulatory clinics in San Diego, CA. Surveys and semi-structured interviews on cannabis use were completed. A multi-methods approach was used to analyze data.

Results: Participants' mean age was 75.3 years; 52.6% identified as women, and 89.5% as White. Cannabis was used by all participants to treat pain and by 75% for insomnia, with 25-33% reductions in use of prescription medications to treat these symptoms. Approximately 89% reported their primary HCPs were aware of their cannabis use, and 84.2% felt very comfortable/comfortable talking to HCPs about cannabis. Common themes from interviews included participants (1) being motivated to disclose cannabis use to their HCPs to seek medical advice on dosing, side effects, and benefits of cannabis, (2) feeling comfortable disclosing cannabis use as legalization has eased the stigma around cannabis use, and (3) perceiving mostly neutral attitudes from HCPs on their cannabis use.

Conclusion: The study emphasizes the pivotal role of HCPs as educators in addressing patient inquiries about cannabis, underlining the need for equipping healthcare professionals with evidence-based knowledge through education and training initiatives.