Ladan Yazdani PhD, Sathiyamoorthy Selladurai PhD, Iman Rafati MSc, Manish Bhatt PhD, Emmanuel Montagnon PhD, Boris Chayer MSc, Damien Olivié MD, Jeanne-Marie Giard MD, MPH, Giada Sebastiani MD, Bich N. Nguyen MD, Guy Cloutier PhD, Eng, An Tang MD, MSc
{"title":"Between-Visit Reproducibility of Shear Wave Viscoelastography in Volunteers and Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease","authors":"Ladan Yazdani PhD, Sathiyamoorthy Selladurai PhD, Iman Rafati MSc, Manish Bhatt PhD, Emmanuel Montagnon PhD, Boris Chayer MSc, Damien Olivié MD, Jeanne-Marie Giard MD, MPH, Giada Sebastiani MD, Bich N. Nguyen MD, Guy Cloutier PhD, Eng, An Tang MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jum.16538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (<i>E</i>), shear modulus (<i>G</i>), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (<i>P</i> > .05). ICCs of SWS, <i>E</i>, <i>G</i>, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were −0.05 (−0.45, 0.35) m/s, −0.61 (−5.33, 4.10) kPa, −0.25 (−2.06, 1.56) kPa, −0.01 (−0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, −0.09 (−7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and −0.33 (−2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"43 11","pages":"2095-2108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jum.16538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess the reproducibility of six ultrasound (US)-determined shear wave (SW) viscoelastography parameters for assessment of mechanical properties of the liver in volunteers and patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).
Methods
This prospective, cross-sectional, institutional review board-approved study included 10 volunteers and 20 patients with MASLD or MASH who underwent liver US elastography twice, at least 2 weeks apart. SW speed (SWS), Young's modulus (E), shear modulus (G), SW attenuation (SWA), SW dispersion (SWD), and viscosity were computed from radiofrequency data recorded on a research US scanner. Linear mixed models were used to consider the sonographer on duty as a confounder. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), reproducibility coefficient (RDC), and Bland-Altman analyses.
Results
The sonographer performing the exam had no impact on viscoelastic parameters (P > .05). ICCs of SWS, E, G, SWA, SWD, and viscosity were, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.79-0.95), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); CVs were 11.9, 23.3, 24.2, 10.1, 29.0, and 32.2%; RDCs were 33.0, 64.5, 66.9, 27.7, 80.3, and 89.2%, and Bland-Altman mean biases and 95% limits of agreement were −0.05 (−0.45, 0.35) m/s, −0.61 (−5.33, 4.10) kPa, −0.25 (−2.06, 1.56) kPa, −0.01 (−0.27, 0.26) Np/m/Hz, −0.09 (−7.09, 6.91) m/s/kHz, and −0.33 (−2.60, 1.94) Pa/s, between the two visits.
Conclusion
US-determined viscoelastography parameters can be measured with high reproducibility and consistency between two visits 2 weeks apart on the same ultrasound machine.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound