Aneurysm Wall Enhancement Can Predict Rupture Point in Intracranial Aneurysms With Multiple Blebs.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003134
Shunsuke Omodaka, Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama, Hiroyuki Sakata, Kenichi Funamoto, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo
{"title":"Aneurysm Wall Enhancement Can Predict Rupture Point in Intracranial Aneurysms With Multiple Blebs.","authors":"Shunsuke Omodaka, Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama, Hiroyuki Sakata, Kenichi Funamoto, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Ruptured aneurysms visualized by vessel wall MRI (VW-MRI) exhibit characteristic aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE). A secondary bulge of the aneurysmal wall, called a bleb, is often the site of rupture in ruptured aneurysms. We hypothesized that a higher degree of AWE would identify the rupture point in aneurysms with multiple blebs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AWE was quantitatively analyzed in consecutive ruptured intracranial aneurysms with multiple blebs (31 aneurysms with a total of 72 blebs) using VW-MRI. A 3-dimensional T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequence was obtained after contrast media injection, and the contrast ratio of the aneurysm wall against the pituitary stalk (CRstalk) was calculated as the AWE indicator. Bleb characteristics, including CRstalk and wall shear stress (WSS), were compared between ruptured and unruptured blebs. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for ruptures were calculated by conditional logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ruptured blebs had a higher CRstalk and lower WSS compared with unruptured blebs. CRstalk remained significantly associated with the bleb rupture status in the conditional logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 3.9, 95% CIs 1.6-9.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AWE is associated with the bleb rupture status independent of WSS. Contrast-enhanced VW-MRI may be a useful noninvasive tool for identifying the rupture point and guiding the treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Ruptured aneurysms visualized by vessel wall MRI (VW-MRI) exhibit characteristic aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE). A secondary bulge of the aneurysmal wall, called a bleb, is often the site of rupture in ruptured aneurysms. We hypothesized that a higher degree of AWE would identify the rupture point in aneurysms with multiple blebs.

Methods: AWE was quantitatively analyzed in consecutive ruptured intracranial aneurysms with multiple blebs (31 aneurysms with a total of 72 blebs) using VW-MRI. A 3-dimensional T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequence was obtained after contrast media injection, and the contrast ratio of the aneurysm wall against the pituitary stalk (CRstalk) was calculated as the AWE indicator. Bleb characteristics, including CRstalk and wall shear stress (WSS), were compared between ruptured and unruptured blebs. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for ruptures were calculated by conditional logistic regression analysis.

Results: Ruptured blebs had a higher CRstalk and lower WSS compared with unruptured blebs. CRstalk remained significantly associated with the bleb rupture status in the conditional logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 3.9, 95% CIs 1.6-9.7).

Conclusion: AWE is associated with the bleb rupture status independent of WSS. Contrast-enhanced VW-MRI may be a useful noninvasive tool for identifying the rupture point and guiding the treatment strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤壁增强可预测多出血点颅内动脉瘤的破裂点
背景和目的:通过血管壁磁共振成像(VW-MRI)观察到的破裂动脉瘤表现出特征性的动脉瘤壁强化(AWE)。动脉瘤壁的继发性隆起称为瘤栓,通常是破裂动脉瘤的破裂部位。我们假设 AWE 的程度越高,就越能确定有多个出血点的动脉瘤的破裂点:使用 VW-MRI 对连续破裂的颅内多出血点动脉瘤(31 个动脉瘤,共 72 个出血点)的 AWE 进行定量分析。在注射造影剂后获得三维 T1 加权快速自旋回波序列,计算动脉瘤壁与垂体柄的对比度(CRstalk)作为 AWE 指标。比较破裂和未破裂出血点的特征,包括CRstalk和壁剪应力(WSS)。通过条件逻辑回归分析计算出破裂的风险比及95%置信区间:结果:与未破裂的出血点相比,破裂出血点的CRstalk更高,WSS更低。在条件逻辑回归中,CRstalk 仍与出血点破裂状态有明显相关性(调整后的几率比为 3.9,95% CIs 为 1.6-9.7):结论:AWE 与眼泡破裂状况相关,与 WSS 无关。对比增强 VW-MRI 可能是确定破裂点和指导治疗策略的有用无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Outcomes After Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas. Outcomes of Traditional Dual Growing Rods With Apical Control Techniques for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: Comparison With Patients Treated With Traditional Dual Growing Rods Only With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Graduation. Understanding the Importance of Blood-Brain Barrier Alterations in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Implications for Treatment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI-Based Prospective Study. Pathophysiology and Prevention of Ventriculostomy-Related Infections: A Review. Is It Justified to Sacrifice the Pituitary Stalk During Craniopharyngioma Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1