Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria using calf and upper arm circumference as phenotypic criteria for assessing muscle mass demonstrate satisfactory validity for diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients: A prospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11200
Larissa Farinha Maffini, Gabrielle Maganha Viegas, Thais Steemburgo, Gabriela Corrêa Souza
{"title":"Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria using calf and upper arm circumference as phenotypic criteria for assessing muscle mass demonstrate satisfactory validity for diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Larissa Farinha Maffini, Gabrielle Maganha Viegas, Thais Steemburgo, Gabriela Corrêa Souza","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized individuals present high rates of malnutrition and loss of muscle mass (MM). Imaging techniques for assessing MM are expensive and scarcely available in hospital practice. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a framework for malnutrition diagnosis that includes simple measurements to assess MM, such as calf circumference (CC) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). This study aimed to analyze the validity of the GLIM criteria with CC and MUAC for malnutrition diagnosis, using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) as the reference standard, in inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted on 453 inpatient adults in a university hospital. The presence of malnutrition was assessed within 48 h of hospital admission using SGA and GLIM criteria using CC and MUAC as phenotypic criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Accuracy, agreement tests, and logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders were performed to test the validity of the GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were aged 59 (46-68) years, 51.4% were male, and 67.8% had elective surgery. Compared with SGA, the GLIM criteria using the two MM assessment measures showed good accuracy (area under the curve > 0.80) and substantial agreement (κ > 0.60) for diagnosing malnutrition. The highest sensitivity was obtained with GLIM<sub>CC</sub> (89%), whereas GLIM<sub>MUAC</sub> showed high specificity (>90%). Also, malnutrition identified by GLIM<sub>CC</sub> and GLIM<sub>MUAC</sub> was significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization and in-hospital death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the absence of imaging techniques to assess MM, the use of CC and MUAC measurements from the GLIM criteria demonstrated satisfactory validity for diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized individuals present high rates of malnutrition and loss of muscle mass (MM). Imaging techniques for assessing MM are expensive and scarcely available in hospital practice. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a framework for malnutrition diagnosis that includes simple measurements to assess MM, such as calf circumference (CC) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). This study aimed to analyze the validity of the GLIM criteria with CC and MUAC for malnutrition diagnosis, using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) as the reference standard, in inpatients.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 453 inpatient adults in a university hospital. The presence of malnutrition was assessed within 48 h of hospital admission using SGA and GLIM criteria using CC and MUAC as phenotypic criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Accuracy, agreement tests, and logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders were performed to test the validity of the GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis.

Results: The patients were aged 59 (46-68) years, 51.4% were male, and 67.8% had elective surgery. Compared with SGA, the GLIM criteria using the two MM assessment measures showed good accuracy (area under the curve > 0.80) and substantial agreement (κ > 0.60) for diagnosing malnutrition. The highest sensitivity was obtained with GLIMCC (89%), whereas GLIMMUAC showed high specificity (>90%). Also, malnutrition identified by GLIMCC and GLIMMUAC was significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization and in-hospital death.

Conclusion: In the absence of imaging techniques to assess MM, the use of CC and MUAC measurements from the GLIM criteria demonstrated satisfactory validity for diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球营养不良领导力倡议 "的标准使用小腿和上臂围度作为评估肌肉质量的表型标准,在诊断住院患者营养不良方面显示出令人满意的有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:住院病人营养不良和肌肉质量下降(MM)的发生率很高。用于评估肌肉质量的成像技术价格昂贵,在医院实践中很少使用。全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)提出了一个营养不良诊断框架,其中包括评估肌肉质量的简单测量方法,如小腿围(CC)和中上臂围(MUAC)。本研究旨在以主观全面评估(SGA)为参考标准,分析 GLIM 标准与 CC 和 MUAC 在住院患者营养不良诊断中的有效性:方法:对一家大学医院的 453 名住院成人进行了前瞻性队列研究。采用 SGA 和 GLIM 标准,以 CC 和 MUAC 作为营养不良诊断的表型标准,评估入院 48 小时内是否存在营养不良。为检验 GLIM 营养不良诊断标准的有效性,对其进行了准确性、一致性测试和逻辑回归分析,并对混杂因素进行了调整:患者年龄为 59(46-68)岁,51.4% 为男性,67.8% 接受过择期手术。与 SGA 相比,使用两种 MM 评估方法的 GLIM 标准在诊断营养不良方面表现出良好的准确性(曲线下面积 > 0.80)和高度一致性(κ > 0.60)。GLIMCC 的灵敏度最高(89%),而 GLIMMUAC 的特异性较高(>90%)。此外,GLIMCC 和 GLIMMUAC 发现的营养不良与住院时间延长和院内死亡有显著关联:结论:在没有影像技术评估营养不良的情况下,使用GLIM标准中的CC和MUAC测量值诊断住院患者营养不良的有效性令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement initiative to achieve early enteral feeds in preterm infants at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Playing sport as a central-line carrier: a survey to collect the European pediatric intestinal failure centers' view. Screening, identification, and diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A retrospective cohort study. Peripheral parenteral nutrition: A retrospective observational study to evaluate utility and complications. Comparing A-mode ultrasound and computed tomography for assessing cancer-related sarcopenia: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1