Investigation of the utility of smartphone-based gait analyses in discrimination between patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2386369
Halil Onder, Ozlem Bizpinar
{"title":"Investigation of the utility of smartphone-based gait analyses in discrimination between patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Halil Onder, Ozlem Bizpinar","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2386369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reveal the discriminative value of gait parameters between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AD and those with a diagnosis of PD who applied to our polyclinic between March 2022 and June 2022. The demographic and clinical features were evaluated during interviews. The gait analyses were performed using a quantitative, smartphone-based gait analyses program. Using this program, the step time (ST), step length (SL), step number (SN), gait velocity (GV), and cadence were measured in all individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 31 patients with AD and 45 with PD were enrolled in the analyses. The mean age of the AD group was higher according to those with PD. As expected, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) values were lower in the AD group. The comparative analyses of the gait parameters between groups did not reveal differences in any of the measures. The correlation analyses to investigate the possible association between the disease severity and gait parameters revealed that the MDS-UPDRS showed low negative correlations with SL and GV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that the evaluation of gait using the gait analyses program does not contribute to the discrimination between AD and PD in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2386369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To reveal the discriminative value of gait parameters between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects.

Methods: We included all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AD and those with a diagnosis of PD who applied to our polyclinic between March 2022 and June 2022. The demographic and clinical features were evaluated during interviews. The gait analyses were performed using a quantitative, smartphone-based gait analyses program. Using this program, the step time (ST), step length (SL), step number (SN), gait velocity (GV), and cadence were measured in all individuals.

Results: Overall, 31 patients with AD and 45 with PD were enrolled in the analyses. The mean age of the AD group was higher according to those with PD. As expected, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) values were lower in the AD group. The comparative analyses of the gait parameters between groups did not reveal differences in any of the measures. The correlation analyses to investigate the possible association between the disease severity and gait parameters revealed that the MDS-UPDRS showed low negative correlations with SL and GV.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the evaluation of gait using the gait analyses program does not contribute to the discrimination between AD and PD in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究基于智能手机的步态分析在区分阿尔茨海默病患者和帕金森病患者方面的实用性。
目的揭示阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)患者步态参数的鉴别价值:我们纳入了 2022 年 3 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在本综合医院就诊的所有新诊断为阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)的连续患者。在访谈过程中对人口统计学和临床特征进行了评估。步态分析使用基于智能手机的定量步态分析程序进行。使用该程序测量了所有患者的步长(SL)、步幅(ST)、步数(SN)、步速(GV)和步调:共有 31 名注意力缺失症患者和 45 名注意力缺失症患者参与分析。注意力缺失症患者的平均年龄高于帕金森病患者。不出所料,注意力缺失症组的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)值较低。对各组步态参数的比较分析未发现任何差异。为研究疾病严重程度与步态参数之间可能存在的关联而进行的相关性分析表明,MDS-UPDRS与SL和GV呈低负相关:我们的研究结果表明,在临床实践中,使用步态分析程序对步态进行评估无助于区分注意力缺失症和帕金森病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. Goal attainment in individual and group-based neuropsychological interventions for young adults with dyslexia in a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1