首页 > 最新文献

Applied Neuropsychology-Adult最新文献

英文 中文
Once is enough! An analogue study on repeated validity assessment in adults with ADHD. 一次就够了!关于多动症成人重复有效性评估的模拟研究。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2431133
Hui Dong, Yvonne Groen, Marieke Pijnenborg, Oliver Tucha, Steffen Aschenbrenner, Matthias Weissbrod, Janneke Koerts, Anselm B M Fuermaier

Performance validity tests (PVTs) can be seen as gatekeepers for valid neuropsychological assessment, by marking cognitive test scores that may not reflect true ability levels. The present study explored the significance of repeated validity testing of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), by exploring the potential value of performance consistency across assessments. The operational definition of performance consistency was determined by calculating the mean variation in a participant's PVT scores across three separate assessments. Neuropsychological test data of 24 individuals diagnosed with ADHD were complemented by an analogue study involving 69 typically developing individuals who were allocated to either a control group or a simulation group instructed to feign ADHD. All individuals were assessed with embedded and stand-alone PVTs three times with one-month intervals between each assessment. The rate of failed validity testing remained rather stable across assessments. Significant differences in neuropsychological performance scores occurred between individuals with ADHD and experimental simulators, however, mostly nonsignificant effects of small size emerged when considering performance consistency. Our data demonstrate that the consistency of cognitive performance over repeated assessments may be no effective approach to complement validity assessment. Replication is needed in independent research on larger samples.

表现效度测验(PVT)可以被视为有效神经心理学评估的把关人,它可以标记出可能无法反映真实能力水平的认知测验分数。本研究通过探索不同评估中表现一致性的潜在价值,探讨了对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)成人进行重复有效性测试的意义。成绩一致性的操作定义是通过计算受试者在三次独立评估中 PVT 分数的平均变化来确定的。一项模拟研究补充了 24 名被诊断为多动症患者的神经心理测试数据,该研究涉及 69 名发育典型的患者,他们被分配到对照组或受指导假装多动症的模拟组。所有受试者都接受了三次嵌入式和独立的 PVT 评估,每次评估间隔一个月。各次评估的有效性测试失败率保持相当稳定。多动症患者和实验模拟人之间的神经心理学表现得分存在显著差异,但是,在考虑表现一致性时,出现的大多是小规模的非显著性影响。我们的数据表明,认知表现在重复评估中的一致性可能不是补充有效性评估的有效方法。需要在更大样本的独立研究中进行重复。
{"title":"Once is enough! An analogue study on repeated validity assessment in adults with ADHD.","authors":"Hui Dong, Yvonne Groen, Marieke Pijnenborg, Oliver Tucha, Steffen Aschenbrenner, Matthias Weissbrod, Janneke Koerts, Anselm B M Fuermaier","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2431133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2431133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performance validity tests (PVTs) can be seen as gatekeepers for valid neuropsychological assessment, by marking cognitive test scores that may not reflect true ability levels. The present study explored the significance of repeated validity testing of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), by exploring the potential value of performance consistency across assessments. The operational definition of performance consistency was determined by calculating the mean variation in a participant's PVT scores across three separate assessments. Neuropsychological test data of 24 individuals diagnosed with ADHD were complemented by an analogue study involving 69 typically developing individuals who were allocated to either a control group or a simulation group instructed to feign ADHD. All individuals were assessed with embedded and stand-alone PVTs three times with one-month intervals between each assessment. The rate of failed validity testing remained rather stable across assessments. Significant differences in neuropsychological performance scores occurred between individuals with ADHD and experimental simulators, however, mostly nonsignificant effects of small size emerged when considering performance consistency. Our data demonstrate that the consistency of cognitive performance over repeated assessments may be no effective approach to complement validity assessment. Replication is needed in independent research on larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are there predictable neuropsychological impairments in persons with functional movement disorder? 功能性运动障碍患者是否存在可预测的神经心理障碍?
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2430338
Bianca Kdeiss, George P Prigatano, William Travis McCuddy

This study attempted to partially test the hypotheses recently proposed by Spagnolo, Garvey, and Hallett that patients with functional movement disorders (FMDs) should demonstrate impaired performance when presented with tasks that sample affect expression/perception, working memory, and cognitive/motor control. A retrospective chart review of the neuropsychological test performance of 17 adult FMD patients was performed to test these hypotheses. Performance on the Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition, and the modified version of the Halstead Finger Tapping Test were used to measure these behaviors. Patients with FMD had difficulty performing tasks involving affect expression/perception and working memory relative to other cognitive functions. However, only one-third of the sample demonstrated clinically relevant slow finger tapping speeds. Our findings are consistent with the predictions proposed by Spagnolo et al. that disturbance of affect expression/perception and working memory are common in patients with FMD. However, there was less evidence for consistent disturbances in cognitive/motor control. Exploring what FMD patients experience when performing these tasks may facilitate their awareness of how non-neurological factors may contribute to their symptoms.

本研究试图对斯帕尼奥洛、加维和哈莱特最近提出的假设进行部分验证,即功能性运动障碍(FMD)患者在完成影响表达/感知、工作记忆和认知/运动控制的任务时,应该会表现出受损的表现。为了验证这些假设,我们对 17 名成年功能性运动障碍患者的神经心理学测试表现进行了回顾性病历审查。巴罗神经研究所高级大脑功能筛查》、《韦氏成人智力量表-第四版》和改良版《哈尔斯特德手指敲击测试》用于测量这些行为的表现。与其他认知功能相比,FMD 患者在完成涉及情感表达/感知和工作记忆的任务时会遇到困难。然而,只有三分之一的样本表现出与临床相关的缓慢手指敲击速度。我们的研究结果与 Spagnolo 等人的预测一致,即情感表达/感知和工作记忆障碍在 FMD 患者中很常见。然而,较少证据表明认知/运动控制出现了一致的紊乱。探索 FMD 患者在完成这些任务时的体验,可能有助于他们认识到非神经学因素是如何导致其症状的。
{"title":"Are there predictable neuropsychological impairments in persons with functional movement disorder?","authors":"Bianca Kdeiss, George P Prigatano, William Travis McCuddy","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2430338","DOIUrl":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2430338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study attempted to partially test the hypotheses recently proposed by Spagnolo, Garvey, and Hallett that patients with functional movement disorders (FMDs) should demonstrate impaired performance when presented with tasks that sample affect expression/perception, working memory, and cognitive/motor control. A retrospective chart review of the neuropsychological test performance of 17 adult FMD patients was performed to test these hypotheses. Performance on the Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition, and the modified version of the Halstead Finger Tapping Test were used to measure these behaviors. Patients with FMD had difficulty performing tasks involving affect expression/perception and working memory relative to other cognitive functions. However, only one-third of the sample demonstrated clinically relevant slow finger tapping speeds. Our findings are consistent with the predictions proposed by Spagnolo et al. that disturbance of affect expression/perception and working memory are common in patients with FMD. However, there was less evidence for consistent disturbances in cognitive/motor control. Exploring what FMD patients experience when performing these tasks may facilitate their awareness of how non-neurological factors may contribute to their symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142670004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III for detecting vascular dementia in Iranian patients with stroke: A secondary data analysis. 用于检测伊朗中风患者血管性痴呆的 Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III 的验证:二次数据分析。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2429549
Sajjad Rezaei, Karim Asgari Mobarake, Maryam Jafroudi, Alia Saberi, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leyli

The current study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the third version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III), and exploring its diagnostic power for a sample of stroke patients in the Iranian population. This was a cross-sectional analytical study, in which 206 patients with stroke were compared with 200 normal individuals as the control group. The patients were diagnosed based on the findings of neuroimaging and clinical examination by a neurologist. ACE-III, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), and The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) were used to gather the data and assess the vascular dementia in the patients. Furthermore, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation coefficient, discriminant function analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to respectively measure internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff point of ACE-III. Internal consistency of ACE-III was excellent (α = 0.92 - 0.95), and convergent validity was measured through calculating the correlation between the scores of ACE-III and MoCA, which was very high (r = 0.957, P < 0.0001). Moreover, overall classification accuracy of ACE-III revealed that it is able to differentiate 87% of patients with vascular dementia from other patients. The area under the ROC curve was found to be 0.84, and cutoff point was 45/46, at which sensitivity and specificity were obtained as 0.72 and 0.90, respectively. ACE-III is a rapid, inexpensive, and efficient tool for evaluating cognitive deficits in specialized neurology clinics to provide a clinical and differential diagnosis of vascular dementia after stroke.

本研究旨在评估第三版阿登布鲁认知检查(ACE-III),并探索其对伊朗人群中的中风患者样本的诊断能力。这是一项横断面分析研究,将 206 名中风患者与 200 名正常人作为对照组进行比较。患者的诊断依据是神经科医生的神经影像学检查和临床检查结果。研究采用 ACE-III、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、老年人认知衰退信息问卷(IQCODE)和 DSM-5 结构化临床访谈(SCID-5)收集数据并评估患者的血管性痴呆情况。此外,Cronbach's alpha、Pearson相关系数、判别功能分析和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分别用于测量ACE-III的内部一致性、收敛效度、判别效度、灵敏度、特异性和临界点。ACE-III的内部一致性非常好(α = 0.92 - 0.95),收敛效度是通过计算ACE-III和MoCA得分之间的相关性来衡量的。
{"title":"Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III for detecting vascular dementia in Iranian patients with stroke: A secondary data analysis.","authors":"Sajjad Rezaei, Karim Asgari Mobarake, Maryam Jafroudi, Alia Saberi, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leyli","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2429549","DOIUrl":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2429549","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the third version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III), and exploring its diagnostic power for a sample of stroke patients in the Iranian population. This was a cross-sectional analytical study, in which 206 patients with stroke were compared with 200 normal individuals as the control group. The patients were diagnosed based on the findings of neuroimaging and clinical examination by a neurologist. ACE-III, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), and The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) were used to gather the data and assess the vascular dementia in the patients. Furthermore, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation coefficient, discriminant function analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to respectively measure internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff point of ACE-III. Internal consistency of ACE-III was excellent (α = 0.92 - 0.95), and convergent validity was measured through calculating the correlation between the scores of ACE-III and MoCA, which was very high (r = 0.957, P < 0.0001). Moreover, overall classification accuracy of ACE-III revealed that it is able to differentiate 87% of patients with vascular dementia from other patients. The area under the ROC curve was found to be 0.84, and cutoff point was 45/46, at which sensitivity and specificity were obtained as 0.72 and 0.90, respectively. ACE-III is a rapid, inexpensive, and efficient tool for evaluating cognitive deficits in specialized neurology clinics to provide a clinical and differential diagnosis of vascular dementia after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in patients with acute cerebellar stroke and its impact on outcome. 急性小脑卒中患者的小脑认知情感综合征特征及其对预后的影响。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2429553
Tokuaki Shinya, Kota Yamauchi, Shota Tanaka, Kei Goto, Shuji Arakawa

Purpose: To evaluate the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale (CCAS-S) in patients with acute cerebellar stroke (ACS) and examine its relationship with the discharge destination.

Methods: Patients with first-time ACS admitted to our hospital between April 2021 and April 2023 were included. The CCAS-S, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) were evaluated 1 week after stroke onset, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM)/Barthel Index (BI) at discharge, duration of hospitalization, and discharge destination were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare CCAS-S and variables.

Results: Thirteen consecutive patients with ACS and age-matched comparison groups were included. The MMSE was within the normal range in all patients; however, patients with stroke had a lower total CCAS-S score (median 72, IQR 66-80) and a higher number of failed tests (median 4, IQR 3-5) than comparison. Significant deficits were observed in semantic fluency (p = 0.008), category switching (p = 0001), and similarity (p = 009). Definite CCAS were diagnosed 10 patients, respectively. Patients discharged home showed better SARA and FIM/BI but similar CCAS-S compared to those discharged to rehabilitation hospitals.

Conclusion: In patients with ACS, it is the impairment of motor function, not CCAS, that affects discharge destination.

目的:评估急性小脑卒中(ACS)患者的小脑认知情感综合征量表(CCAS-S),并研究其与出院去向的关系:纳入2021年4月至2023年4月期间我院收治的首次ACS患者。方法:纳入 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 4 月我院首次收治的小脑卒中(ACS)患者,评估卒中发生 1 周后的 CCAS-S、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA),并评估出院时的功能独立性测量(FIM)/巴特尔指数(BI)、住院时间和出院去向。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较 CCAS-S 和变量:结果:连续纳入了 13 名 ACS 患者和年龄匹配的对比组。所有患者的 MMSE 均在正常范围内;但与对比组相比,脑卒中患者的 CCAS-S 总分较低(中位数 72,IQR 66-80),测试失败次数较多(中位数 4,IQR 3-5)。在语义流畅性(p = 0.008)、类别转换(p = 0001)和相似性(p = 009)方面观察到明显缺陷。分别有10名患者被确诊为CCAS。出院回家的患者与康复医院的患者相比,SARA和FIM/BI表现更好,但CCAS-S相似:结论:对 ACS 患者而言,影响出院去向的是运动功能障碍,而非 CCAS。
{"title":"Characteristics of cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in patients with acute cerebellar stroke and its impact on outcome.","authors":"Tokuaki Shinya, Kota Yamauchi, Shota Tanaka, Kei Goto, Shuji Arakawa","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2429553","DOIUrl":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2429553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale (CCAS-S) in patients with acute cerebellar stroke (ACS) and examine its relationship with the discharge destination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with first-time ACS admitted to our hospital between April 2021 and April 2023 were included. The CCAS-S, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) were evaluated 1 week after stroke onset, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM)/Barthel Index (BI) at discharge, duration of hospitalization, and discharge destination were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare CCAS-S and variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen consecutive patients with ACS and age-matched comparison groups were included. The MMSE was within the normal range in all patients; however, patients with stroke had a lower total CCAS-S score (median 72, IQR 66-80) and a higher number of failed tests (median 4, IQR 3-5) than comparison. Significant deficits were observed in semantic fluency (<i>p</i> = 0.008), category switching (<i>p</i> = 0001), and similarity (<i>p</i> = 009). Definite CCAS were diagnosed 10 patients, respectively. Patients discharged home showed better SARA and FIM/BI but similar CCAS-S compared to those discharged to rehabilitation hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ACS, it is the impairment of motor function, not CCAS, that affects discharge destination.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between ADHD symptoms, executive function and frontal EEG in college students. 大学生多动症症状、执行功能和额叶脑电图之间的关联。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2426180
Mykenzi L H Allison, Alleyne P R Broomell

Introduction: This study aims to assess whether electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral power change scores (e.g. task spectral power subtracted from resting state spectral power) across three different frequency bands, alpha (8-12 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz), predicts self-reported attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms using the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) over and above self-reported executive function (EF) abilities using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-scores for adults.

Methods: Data were collected at a rural, mid-sized southeastern university (N = 52) and participants received course credit for participation. Participants self-reported ADHD symptoms and EF abilities before completing eyes open resting state and the attention network test (ANT), a common flanker task that measures ability to orient attention, stay alert, and resolve conflict (i.e. distractor arrows) while recording EEG spectral power at electrodes F3 and F4. Bivariate correlations determine associations between EEG measures and self-reported ADHD symptoms and EF abilities. Linear regressions were used to assess whether EEG change scores were predictive of ADHD symptoms over and above EF abilities.

Results: High correlation coefficients were found only when comparing the ASRS and BRIEF-A GEC T-scores (r = .822, p <.001). Regression analyses produced significant results indicating EEG spectral change scores were predictive of ADHD symptoms, over and above GEC T-Scores, for the alpha band but not the theta and beta bands. Additionally, we found an inverse relationship when comparing change scores in the alpha band across the right (F4) and left (F3) hemispheres supporting the theory of frontal asymmetry for individuals with increased ADHD symptoms.

Conclusion: This study is the first to assess the predictive ability of EEG spectral power change scores in predicting ADHD symptoms, which are not solely explained by deficits in executive control. Past research has indicated significant differences when comparing task and resting state spectral power indicating change scores might have some utility in measuring cognitive load, specifically in the alpha band, which has been associated with inhibition, working memory, and anticipation of stimuli. Further research should be conducted to assess the utility change scores might have in providing an objective measure related to a clinical population with ADHD.

简介本研究旨在评估脑电图(EEG)频谱功率变化分数(例如,任务频谱功率减去静息状态频谱功率)在三个不同频段α(8-12 Hz)、θ(4-7 Hz)和β(13-30 Hz)三个不同频段的任务频谱功率减去静息状态频谱功率),是否能预测使用成人多动症自评量表(ASRS)的自我报告的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状,并高于使用执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF-A)的自我报告的执行功能(EF)能力:数据在东南部一所中等规模的农村大学收集(N = 52),参加者可获得课程学分。参与者在完成睁眼静息状态和注意力网络测试(ANT)之前自我报告了多动症症状和EF能力,ANT是一种常见的侧翼任务,用于测量注意力定向、保持警觉和解决冲突(即分心箭头)的能力,同时记录F3和F4电极的脑电图频谱功率。双变量相关性确定了脑电图测量与自我报告的多动症症状和EF能力之间的关联。线性回归用于评估脑电图变化分数是否比 EF 能力更能预测 ADHD 症状:结果:只有在比较 ASRS 和 BRIEF-A GEC T 分数时才发现了较高的相关系数(r = .822,p 结论:只有在比较 ASRS 和 BRIEF-A GEC T 分数时才发现了较高的相关系数(r = .822,p 结论):本研究首次评估了脑电图频谱功率变化分数在预测多动症症状方面的预测能力,而多动症症状并不能完全由执行控制能力的缺陷所解释。过去的研究表明,在比较任务和静息状态频谱功率时存在明显差异,这表明变化分数在测量认知负荷方面可能具有一定的实用性,特别是在α波段,该波段与抑制、工作记忆和对刺激的预期有关。应开展进一步研究,以评估变化分数在提供与多动症临床人群相关的客观测量方面可能具有的效用。
{"title":"Associations between ADHD symptoms, executive function and frontal EEG in college students.","authors":"Mykenzi L H Allison, Alleyne P R Broomell","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2426180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2426180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess whether electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral power change scores (e.g. task spectral power subtracted from resting state spectral power) across three different frequency bands, alpha (8-12 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz), predicts self-reported attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms using the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) over and above self-reported executive function (EF) abilities using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-scores for adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected at a rural, mid-sized southeastern university (N = 52) and participants received course credit for participation. Participants self-reported ADHD symptoms and EF abilities before completing eyes open resting state and the attention network test (ANT), a common flanker task that measures ability to orient attention, stay alert, and resolve conflict (i.e. distractor arrows) while recording EEG spectral power at electrodes F3 and F4. Bivariate correlations determine associations between EEG measures and self-reported ADHD symptoms and EF abilities. Linear regressions were used to assess whether EEG change scores were predictive of ADHD symptoms over and above EF abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High correlation coefficients were found only when comparing the ASRS and BRIEF-A GEC T-scores (<i>r</i> = .822, <i>p</i> <.001). Regression analyses produced significant results indicating EEG spectral change scores were predictive of ADHD symptoms, over and above GEC T-Scores, for the alpha band but not the theta and beta bands. Additionally, we found an inverse relationship when comparing change scores in the alpha band across the right (F4) and left (F3) hemispheres supporting the theory of frontal asymmetry for individuals with increased ADHD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to assess the predictive ability of EEG spectral power change scores in predicting ADHD symptoms, which are not solely explained by deficits in executive control. Past research has indicated significant differences when comparing task and resting state spectral power indicating change scores might have some utility in measuring cognitive load, specifically in the alpha band, which has been associated with inhibition, working memory, and anticipation of stimuli. Further research should be conducted to assess the utility change scores might have in providing an objective measure related to a clinical population with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship between frontal alpha asymmetry and self-report measurements of depression, anxiety, stress, and self-regulation. 额叶阿尔法不对称性与抑郁、焦虑、压力和自我调节的自我报告测量之间的关系。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2425361
Atakan M Akil, Mega Watty, Renata Cserjesi, H N Alexander Logemann

Though previous research yielded inconsistent results, studies suggest an association between frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), mood, and self-regulation. This inconsistency may be explained by the heterogeneity of experimental protocols and sample characteristics such as the baseline level of distress. The aim of the study was to gain a better understanding of the relationship between FAA and self-report measurements of depression, anxiety, stress, and self-regulation. Using data from 130 participants (Mage = 25.2; SD = 6.8), we conducted correlation analyses and Bayesian statistics to examine these associations. The results revealed moderate-level positive correlations among depression, anxiety, and stress scores measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, with notable negative correlations observed between self-regulation and depression, as well as between self-regulation and stress. The relationship between FAA and mood was sample-dependent, and effects were restricted to the sample with moderate to extreme levels of distress, revealing consistent patterns within these subgroups. Most importantly, there was a negative correlation between FAA and anxiety. However, there was no clear association between FAA and depression. Consequently, our results show that self-regulation is associated with reduced distress, and that FAA may be a useful biomarker for anxiety in individuals with moderate to high baseline distress levels.

尽管之前的研究结果并不一致,但研究表明额叶阿尔法不对称(FAA)、情绪和自我调节之间存在关联。这种不一致性可能是由于实验方案和样本特征(如基线困扰水平)的异质性造成的。本研究旨在更好地了解颞叶额叶频散与抑郁、焦虑、压力和自我调节的自我报告测量之间的关系。我们利用 130 名参与者(年龄 = 25.2;标准差 = 6.8)的数据,进行了相关分析和贝叶斯统计来研究这些关联。结果显示,抑郁、焦虑和压力得分之间存在中度正相关,自我调节与抑郁之间以及自我调节与压力之间存在明显的负相关。FAA 与情绪之间的关系取决于样本,其影响仅限于中度到极度痛苦的样本,揭示了这些亚群中的一致模式。最重要的是,自律与焦虑之间存在负相关。然而,FAA 与抑郁之间没有明显的关联。因此,我们的研究结果表明,自我调节与困扰的减少有关,而对于基线困扰水平为中度到高度的个体来说,FAA 可能是一种有用的焦虑生物标志物。
{"title":"The relationship between frontal alpha asymmetry and self-report measurements of depression, anxiety, stress, and self-regulation.","authors":"Atakan M Akil, Mega Watty, Renata Cserjesi, H N Alexander Logemann","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2425361","DOIUrl":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2425361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though previous research yielded inconsistent results, studies suggest an association between frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), mood, and self-regulation. This inconsistency may be explained by the heterogeneity of experimental protocols and sample characteristics such as the baseline level of distress. The aim of the study was to gain a better understanding of the relationship between FAA and self-report measurements of depression, anxiety, stress, and self-regulation. Using data from 130 participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 25.2; SD = 6.8), we conducted correlation analyses and Bayesian statistics to examine these associations. The results revealed moderate-level positive correlations among depression, anxiety, and stress scores measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, with notable negative correlations observed between self-regulation and depression, as well as between self-regulation and stress. The relationship between FAA and mood was sample-dependent, and effects were restricted to the sample with moderate to extreme levels of distress, revealing consistent patterns within these subgroups. Most importantly, there was a negative correlation between FAA and anxiety. However, there was no clear association between FAA and depression. Consequently, our results show that self-regulation is associated with reduced distress, and that FAA may be a useful biomarker for anxiety in individuals with moderate to high baseline distress levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring subjective cognitive complaints with covid-19 brain fog using the subjective scale to investigate cognition (SSTICS). 使用认知调查主观量表(SSTICS)测量 covid-19 脑雾的主观认知抱怨。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2422926
Emmanuel Stip, Alyazia Abdulla Alkaabi, Mohammed AlAhbabi, Fadwa Al-Mugaddam, Ovidiu Lungu, Marwan Faisal Albastaki, Saleh Darweesh Alhammadi, Karim Abdel Aziz

The term "brain fog" has emerged from the observations of neuropsychiatric conditions present in post-COVID-19 infections. This is characterized by concentration and memory problems, selective attention disorders and difficulties in executive functions, yet it is unclear how long these deficits may persist and which cognitive functions are most vulnerable. Therefore, there is a need to properly evaluate these cognitive complaints using an assessment tool that specifies their intensity and nature. Our primary objective was to explore subjective perceptions of cognitive functioning in COVID-19-associated with brain fog using a tool that was previously validated for assessing subjective cognitive complaints. A total of 68 participants were recruited and the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition (SSTICS) was used to assess cognitive complaints. This was the first time that the SSTICS was used for this purpose in subjects with COVID-19. In addition, participants were administered a questionnaire assessing for the presence of various symptoms, as well as COVID-19 clinical parameters. The neuropsychological basis for the construct of the SSTICS was related to the cognitive complaints expressed by participants. A reliability analysis of our sample indicated a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha= 0.951). Associations between various SSTICS scores and COVID-related symptomatology and the differences between group of participants who reported cognitive complaints ("complainers") and those who did not were assessed. We performed an exploratory factorial analysis based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Based on their distribution, participants were grouped into: "good functioning" - scores 0-9 (35.3%); "medium functioning" - scores 14-23 (25%); and "poor functioning" - scores 26-71 (39.7%). The mean SSTICS score was 20.59 (SD 16.61) and correlated with the quarantine duration and loss of smell. Complainers differed significantly from non-complainers in the total number of symptoms, the quarantine duration and the presence/absence of specific symptoms, such as loss of smell, tiredness and aches/pains. Our study showed that >10% of patients reported subjective cognitive complaints following COVID-19, with most reporting mild or serious cognitive complaints, mostly within the domains of memory, attention, language, executive functioning or praxis.

通过观察 COVID-19 感染后的神经精神状况,"脑雾 "一词应运而生。其特点是注意力和记忆问题、选择性注意力障碍和执行功能困难,但这些缺陷可能会持续多久以及哪些认知功能最容易受到影响尚不清楚。因此,有必要使用一种能明确其强度和性质的评估工具来正确评估这些认知症状。我们的主要目的是使用一种先前经过验证的评估主观认知症状的工具,探讨 COVID-19 患者对与脑雾相关的认知功能的主观感受。我们共招募了 68 名参与者,并使用主观认知调查量表 (SSTICS) 来评估认知症状。这是 SSTICS 首次用于 COVID-19 患者。此外,还对受试者进行了问卷调查,评估其是否存在各种症状以及 COVID-19 的临床参数。SSTICS 构建的神经心理学基础与参与者表达的认知抱怨有关。对样本进行的信度分析表明,该问卷具有高度的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.951)。我们评估了 SSTICS 各项得分与 COVID 相关症状之间的关联,以及报告认知抱怨的参与者("抱怨者")与未报告认知抱怨的参与者之间的差异。我们根据主成分分析法(PCA)进行了探索性因子分析。根据参与者的分布情况,我们将其分为以下几组"功能良好"--0-9 分(35.3%);"功能中等"--14-23 分(25%);"功能较差"--26-71 分(39.7%)。SSTICS 的平均得分为 20.59(标准差为 16.61),与隔离时间和嗅觉丧失有关。投诉者与非投诉者在症状总数、隔离持续时间以及有/无特定症状(如嗅觉减退、疲倦和疼痛)方面存在明显差异。我们的研究表明,超过 10% 的患者在 COVID-19 之后报告了主观认知症状,其中大多数人报告了轻微或严重的认知症状,主要集中在记忆、注意力、语言、执行功能或练习等领域。
{"title":"Measuring subjective cognitive complaints with covid-19 brain fog using the subjective scale to investigate cognition (SSTICS).","authors":"Emmanuel Stip, Alyazia Abdulla Alkaabi, Mohammed AlAhbabi, Fadwa Al-Mugaddam, Ovidiu Lungu, Marwan Faisal Albastaki, Saleh Darweesh Alhammadi, Karim Abdel Aziz","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2422926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2422926","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"brain fog\" has emerged from the observations of neuropsychiatric conditions present in post-COVID-19 infections. This is characterized by concentration and memory problems, selective attention disorders and difficulties in executive functions, yet it is unclear how long these deficits may persist and which cognitive functions are most vulnerable. Therefore, there is a need to properly evaluate these cognitive complaints using an assessment tool that specifies their intensity and nature. Our primary objective was to explore subjective perceptions of cognitive functioning in COVID-19-associated with brain fog using a tool that was previously validated for assessing subjective cognitive complaints. A total of 68 participants were recruited and the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition (SSTICS) was used to assess cognitive complaints. This was the first time that the SSTICS was used for this purpose in subjects with COVID-19. In addition, participants were administered a questionnaire assessing for the presence of various symptoms, as well as COVID-19 clinical parameters. The neuropsychological basis for the construct of the SSTICS was related to the cognitive complaints expressed by participants. A reliability analysis of our sample indicated a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha= 0.951). Associations between various SSTICS scores and COVID-related symptomatology and the differences between group of participants who reported cognitive complaints (\"complainers\") and those who did not were assessed. We performed an exploratory factorial analysis based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Based on their distribution, participants were grouped into: \"good functioning\" - scores 0-9 (35.3%); \"medium functioning\" - scores 14-23 (25%); and \"poor functioning\" - scores 26-71 (39.7%). The mean SSTICS score was 20.59 (SD 16.61) and correlated with the quarantine duration and loss of smell. Complainers differed significantly from non-complainers in the total number of symptoms, the quarantine duration and the presence/absence of specific symptoms, such as loss of smell, tiredness and aches/pains. Our study showed that >10% of patients reported subjective cognitive complaints following COVID-19, with most reporting mild or serious cognitive complaints, mostly within the domains of memory, attention, language, executive functioning or praxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. 老年人功能能力评估访谈的介绍和初步心理测量学评估。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2419932
Nicole Sergeyev, Nadia Paré, Aneela Rahman, Anjali Krishnan, David E Warren, Trevor Wolterstoff, Anna Wilhelm, Erica Aflagah, Laura Rabin

Measures of complex functional decision-making capacity can greatly aid in assessing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and facilitating early intervention in dementia care. We examined the ability of the Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview (AFCI) to detect functional differences among older adults who were cognitively unimpaired (CU), or who presented with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or MCI. A sample of 97 older adults (CU; n = 30, Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 years; SCD; n = 34, Mage = 72.56 ± 6.43 years; MCI; n = 33, Mage = 78.28 ± 7.55 years) underwent neuropsychological testing and responded to the Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Informants completed the Assessment of Functional Capacity (AFCI), an instrument of functional decision-making capacity, and responded to the Social Vulnerability Scale (SVS15) and Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (A-IADL-Q-SV), a measure of functional status, for comparison. According to informant-reported responses, the CU group had significantly lower AFCI total (and domain) scores, H(2) = 27.59, p<.001, relative to MCI. Additionally, the CU group had significantly lower AFCI scores in the Home and Personal Safety domain relative to the SCD group, H(2) = 14.06, p<.05. In the overall sample, AFCI total scores were associated with FCI-SF, SVS15, and A-IADL-Q-SV scores and cognitive measures. Our results demonstrate that the AFCI is sensitive to impairment in safety, social, financial, and medical functioning in MCI and is associated with measures of cognitive functioning and social vulnerability in older adults. Incorporating this instrument as a supplement to cognitive screening instruments may aid in the prevention of hazardous decision-making in older adults.

对复杂功能决策能力的测量可极大地帮助评估轻度认知障碍(MCI),并促进对痴呆症护理的早期干预。我们研究了功能能力评估访谈(AFCI)检测认知功能未受损(CU)或出现主观认知功能下降(SCD)或 MCI 的老年人的功能差异的能力。97 名老年人(CU;n = 30,Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 岁;SCD;n = 34,Mage = 72.56 ± 6.43 岁;MCI;n = 33,Mage = 78.28 ± 7.55 岁)接受了神经心理学测试,并回答了财务能力问卷(FCI-SF)。信息提供者完成了功能决策能力评估(AFCI),并回答了社会脆弱性量表(SVS15)和阿姆斯特丹日常生活工具活动(A-IADL-Q-SV)(一种功能状态测量),以进行比较。根据信息提供者的报告,CU 组的 AFCI 总分(和领域分)显著低于 SCD 组,H(2) = 27.59,pHome 和个人安全领域分显著低于 SCD 组,H(2) = 14.06, p
{"title":"Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults.","authors":"Nicole Sergeyev, Nadia Paré, Aneela Rahman, Anjali Krishnan, David E Warren, Trevor Wolterstoff, Anna Wilhelm, Erica Aflagah, Laura Rabin","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2419932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2419932","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measures of complex functional decision-making capacity can greatly aid in assessing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and facilitating early intervention in dementia care. We examined the ability of the Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview (AFCI) to detect functional differences among older adults who were cognitively unimpaired (CU), or who presented with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or MCI. A sample of 97 older adults (CU; n = 30, Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 years; SCD; n = 34, Mage = 72.56 ± 6.43 years; MCI; n = 33, Mage = 78.28 ± 7.55 years) underwent neuropsychological testing and responded to the Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Informants completed the Assessment of Functional Capacity (AFCI), an instrument of functional decision-making capacity, and responded to the Social Vulnerability Scale (SVS15) and Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (A-IADL-Q-SV), a measure of functional status, for comparison. According to informant-reported responses, the CU group had significantly lower AFCI total (and domain) scores, <i>H</i>(2) = 27.59, <i>p</i><.001, relative to MCI. Additionally, the CU group had significantly lower AFCI scores in the <i>Home and Personal Safety</i> domain relative to the SCD group, <i>H</i>(2) = 14.06, <i>p</i><.05. In the overall sample, AFCI total scores were associated with FCI-SF, SVS15, and A-IADL-Q-SV scores and cognitive measures. Our results demonstrate that the AFCI is sensitive to impairment in safety, social, financial, and medical functioning in MCI and is associated with measures of cognitive functioning and social vulnerability in older adults. Incorporating this instrument as a supplement to cognitive screening instruments may aid in the prevention of hazardous decision-making in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. 记忆不良测试第二版:来自西班牙认知能力正常成年人的标准数据。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2421450
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Lindsay E Ayearst, Diego Rivera, Mia E Dini, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Daniela Ramos-Usuga, Paul B Perrin, Robert McCaffrey

This study evaluated the universality of the TOMM 2 and provided a reference sample of cognitively intact adults living in Spain whose native language was Spanish. A total of 203 adults completed the TOMM 2 from June 2019 to January 2020. When using the original TOMM cutoff scores derived from English speakers, all participants scored in a range that would suggest that they passed the TOMM. When using a cut score less than 40 on Trial 1, only one participant in this study would be mistakenly classified as providing an invalid performance. Spanish-speaking adults in Spain from this study achieved a perfect score on Trial 1 at a rate more than double that of English-speaking individuals on the original TOMM. At the item level, all but one item met the minimum standard for performance validity; this item fell only marginally below the standard at 89%. This study found a very low failure rate for the TOMM 2, suggesting that the second edition has at least as high specificity as the original in Spanish adults.

这项研究评估了 TOMM 2 的通用性,并为居住在西班牙、母语为西班牙语、认知能力完好的成年人提供了参考样本。从2019年6月到2020年1月,共有203名成年人完成了TOMM 2。当使用从英语使用者中得出的原始 TOMM 临界分数时,所有参与者的得分都在表明他们通过了 TOMM 的范围内。如果在试验 1 中使用低于 40 分的分数线,本研究中只有一名参与者会被误认为成绩无效。在本研究中,西班牙讲西班牙语的成年人在测试 1 中获得满分的比率是原 TOMM 中讲英语者的两倍多。在项目层面,除一个项目外,所有项目都达到了成绩有效性的最低标准;该项目仅略低于标准,为 89%。本研究发现,TOMM 2 的失败率非常低,这表明第二版 TOMM 在西班牙语成人中至少具有与原版一样高的特异性。
{"title":"Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain.","authors":"Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Lindsay E Ayearst, Diego Rivera, Mia E Dini, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Daniela Ramos-Usuga, Paul B Perrin, Robert McCaffrey","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2421450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2421450","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the universality of the TOMM 2 and provided a reference sample of cognitively intact adults living in Spain whose native language was Spanish. A total of 203 adults completed the TOMM 2 from June 2019 to January 2020. When using the original TOMM cutoff scores derived from English speakers, all participants scored in a range that would suggest that they passed the TOMM. When using a cut score less than 40 on Trial 1, only one participant in this study would be mistakenly classified as providing an invalid performance. Spanish-speaking adults in Spain from this study achieved a perfect score on Trial 1 at a rate more than double that of English-speaking individuals on the original TOMM. At the item level, all but one item met the minimum standard for performance validity; this item fell only marginally below the standard at 89%. This study found a very low failure rate for the TOMM 2, suggesting that the second edition has at least as high specificity as the original in Spanish adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. 巴西帕金森病患者接受丘脑下核深部脑刺激治疗后出现的抑郁症状:一项横断面研究。
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2423836
Thayná Laís de Souza Arten, Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder that primarily affects movement and is often accompanied by depressive symptoms. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a therapeutic intervention for PD, although its impact on depressive symptoms remains complex. This study investigates the relationship between PD, DBS, and depressive symptoms, focusing on how DBS influences cognitive function and mood among PD patients in Brazil. The study involved two cohorts: one in 2019 with 46 participants and another in 2022 with 31 patients. Distinct assessment instruments, including the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and Beck Depression Inventory-II, were employed to evaluate depressive symptoms. The results revealed no significant correlation between participants' gender and the presence of DBS, but substantial differences were observed in age, disease duration, and Activities of Daily Living scores. Patients undergoing DBS showed notably poorer cognitive performance compared to those treated solely with medication. Furthermore, the use of DBS was associated with higher scores on depressive symptoms scales within one of the cohorts. These findings underscore the intricate interplay among PD, DBS treatment, and depressive symptoms, highlighting the necessity for tailored approaches to patient care.

帕金森病(PD)是一种主要影响运动的神经系统疾病,通常伴有抑郁症状。眼下核(STN)深部脑刺激(DBS)已成为帕金森病的一种治疗干预手段,但它对抑郁症状的影响仍然很复杂。本研究调查了帕金森病、DBS 和抑郁症状之间的关系,重点关注 DBS 如何影响巴西帕金森病患者的认知功能和情绪。该研究涉及两个队列:一个队列于 2019 年进行,有 46 名参与者;另一个队列于 2022 年进行,有 31 名患者。研究采用了不同的评估工具,包括老年抑郁量表-15 和贝克抑郁量表-II,以评估抑郁症状。结果显示,参与者的性别与是否接受 DBS 治疗之间没有明显的相关性,但在年龄、病程和日常生活活动评分方面却存在很大差异。与仅接受药物治疗的患者相比,接受 DBS 治疗的患者认知能力明显较差。此外,在其中一个队列中,使用 DBS 与抑郁症状量表评分较高有关。这些发现强调了帕金森病、DBS治疗和抑郁症状之间错综复杂的相互作用,突出了为患者提供量身定制的治疗方法的必要性。
{"title":"Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study.","authors":"Thayná Laís de Souza Arten, Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2423836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2423836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder that primarily affects movement and is often accompanied by depressive symptoms. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a therapeutic intervention for PD, although its impact on depressive symptoms remains complex. This study investigates the relationship between PD, DBS, and depressive symptoms, focusing on how DBS influences cognitive function and mood among PD patients in Brazil. The study involved two cohorts: one in 2019 with 46 participants and another in 2022 with 31 patients. Distinct assessment instruments, including the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and Beck Depression Inventory-II, were employed to evaluate depressive symptoms. The results revealed no significant correlation between participants' gender and the presence of DBS, but substantial differences were observed in age, disease duration, and Activities of Daily Living scores. Patients undergoing DBS showed notably poorer cognitive performance compared to those treated solely with medication. Furthermore, the use of DBS was associated with higher scores on depressive symptoms scales within one of the cohorts. These findings underscore the intricate interplay among PD, DBS treatment, and depressive symptoms, highlighting the necessity for tailored approaches to patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142577338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1