Surgical Interventions for Acute Limb Ischaemia (ALI).

Zia Ur Rehman, Faisal Sher, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa
{"title":"Surgical Interventions for Acute Limb Ischaemia (ALI).","authors":"Zia Ur Rehman, Faisal Sher, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate presentations, aetiologies, interventions, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Record of 104 patients who underwent surgical interventions for ALI was retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed on imaging (ultrasound / CTA / conventional angiography). Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, aetiologies, and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort's mean age was 58.89 ± 12.6 years, with (54.8%, n = 57) females and (45.2%, n = 47) males. Hypertension (54.8%, n = 57), diabetes (46.2%, n = 48), and atrial fibrillation (34.6%, n = 36) were common comorbidities. Thromboembolism (67.3%, n = 70) and thrombotic occlusion (32.7%, n = 34) were primary aetiologies, predominantly affecting the lower limb (66.3%, n = 58) and femoral artery (51.9%, n = 54). The majority of cases were classified as Rutherford classification 2A (53.8%; 56 cases) and 2B (44.2%; 46 cases); 58 (55.8%) patients were classified as ASA Class III, while 36 (34.6%) patients were categorised as ASA Class IV. Embolectomy (80.8%, n = 84) was the prevailing intervention, with an amputation rate (17.3%, n = 18) and a mortality rate (5.8%, n = 6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with ALI presented with Rutherford Class II and had thromboembolism aetiology. Embolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure with a high amputation rate and mortality.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Acute limb ischaemia, Embolectomy, Amputation, Thromboembolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 8","pages":"985-988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate presentations, aetiologies, interventions, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).

Study design: An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 to December 2020.

Methodology: Record of 104 patients who underwent surgical interventions for ALI was retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed on imaging (ultrasound / CTA / conventional angiography). Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, aetiologies, and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results: The cohort's mean age was 58.89 ± 12.6 years, with (54.8%, n = 57) females and (45.2%, n = 47) males. Hypertension (54.8%, n = 57), diabetes (46.2%, n = 48), and atrial fibrillation (34.6%, n = 36) were common comorbidities. Thromboembolism (67.3%, n = 70) and thrombotic occlusion (32.7%, n = 34) were primary aetiologies, predominantly affecting the lower limb (66.3%, n = 58) and femoral artery (51.9%, n = 54). The majority of cases were classified as Rutherford classification 2A (53.8%; 56 cases) and 2B (44.2%; 46 cases); 58 (55.8%) patients were classified as ASA Class III, while 36 (34.6%) patients were categorised as ASA Class IV. Embolectomy (80.8%, n = 84) was the prevailing intervention, with an amputation rate (17.3%, n = 18) and a mortality rate (5.8%, n = 6).

Conclusion: Most patients with ALI presented with Rutherford Class II and had thromboembolism aetiology. Embolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure with a high amputation rate and mortality.

Key words: Acute limb ischaemia, Embolectomy, Amputation, Thromboembolism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肢体缺血(ALI)的外科干预。
研究目的评估急性肢体缺血(ALI)患者的表现、病因、干预措施和治疗效果:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦卡拉奇阿迦汗大学医院外科,2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月:方法:回顾性评估104例因ALI接受手术治疗的患者的记录。诊断由影像学(超声/CTA/常规血管造影)证实。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析了人口统计学特征、并发症、病因和结果:患者平均年龄为(58.89 ± 12.6)岁,其中女性(54.8%,n = 57),男性(45.2%,n = 47)。高血压(54.8%,n = 57)、糖尿病(46.2%,n = 48)和心房颤动(34.6%,n = 36)是常见的合并症。血栓栓塞(67.3%,n = 70)和血栓闭塞(32.7%,n = 34)是主要病因,主要影响下肢(66.3%,n = 58)和股动脉(51.9%,n = 54)。大多数病例被归类为卢瑟福分类 2A(53.8%;56 例)和 2B(44.2%;46 例);58 例(55.8%)患者被归类为 ASA III 级,36 例(34.6%)患者被归类为 ASA IV 级。栓子切除术(80.8%,n = 84)是最主要的干预措施,截肢率(17.3%,n = 18)和死亡率(5.8%,n = 6):结论:大多数 ALI 患者为卢瑟福 II 级,病因为血栓栓塞。栓塞切除术是最常见的手术,截肢率和死亡率都很高:急性肢体缺血、栓塞切除术、截肢、血栓栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frequency of Anti-Ganglioside Antibodies and Their Clinical Correlates in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Single-Centre Study in Pakistan. Prognostic Impact of Wilms' Tumour 1 Mutation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. The Need for Dedicated Brain Injury Rehabilitation Units in Pakistan. Frequency of Impaired Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Results in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis Within 18 Months after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1