Surgical Interventions for Acute Limb Ischaemia (ALI).

Zia Ur Rehman, Faisal Sher, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa
{"title":"Surgical Interventions for Acute Limb Ischaemia (ALI).","authors":"Zia Ur Rehman, Faisal Sher, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate presentations, aetiologies, interventions, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Record of 104 patients who underwent surgical interventions for ALI was retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed on imaging (ultrasound / CTA / conventional angiography). Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, aetiologies, and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort's mean age was 58.89 ± 12.6 years, with (54.8%, n = 57) females and (45.2%, n = 47) males. Hypertension (54.8%, n = 57), diabetes (46.2%, n = 48), and atrial fibrillation (34.6%, n = 36) were common comorbidities. Thromboembolism (67.3%, n = 70) and thrombotic occlusion (32.7%, n = 34) were primary aetiologies, predominantly affecting the lower limb (66.3%, n = 58) and femoral artery (51.9%, n = 54). The majority of cases were classified as Rutherford classification 2A (53.8%; 56 cases) and 2B (44.2%; 46 cases); 58 (55.8%) patients were classified as ASA Class III, while 36 (34.6%) patients were categorised as ASA Class IV. Embolectomy (80.8%, n = 84) was the prevailing intervention, with an amputation rate (17.3%, n = 18) and a mortality rate (5.8%, n = 6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with ALI presented with Rutherford Class II and had thromboembolism aetiology. Embolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure with a high amputation rate and mortality.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Acute limb ischaemia, Embolectomy, Amputation, Thromboembolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 8","pages":"985-988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate presentations, aetiologies, interventions, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).

Study design: An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 to December 2020.

Methodology: Record of 104 patients who underwent surgical interventions for ALI was retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed on imaging (ultrasound / CTA / conventional angiography). Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, aetiologies, and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results: The cohort's mean age was 58.89 ± 12.6 years, with (54.8%, n = 57) females and (45.2%, n = 47) males. Hypertension (54.8%, n = 57), diabetes (46.2%, n = 48), and atrial fibrillation (34.6%, n = 36) were common comorbidities. Thromboembolism (67.3%, n = 70) and thrombotic occlusion (32.7%, n = 34) were primary aetiologies, predominantly affecting the lower limb (66.3%, n = 58) and femoral artery (51.9%, n = 54). The majority of cases were classified as Rutherford classification 2A (53.8%; 56 cases) and 2B (44.2%; 46 cases); 58 (55.8%) patients were classified as ASA Class III, while 36 (34.6%) patients were categorised as ASA Class IV. Embolectomy (80.8%, n = 84) was the prevailing intervention, with an amputation rate (17.3%, n = 18) and a mortality rate (5.8%, n = 6).

Conclusion: Most patients with ALI presented with Rutherford Class II and had thromboembolism aetiology. Embolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure with a high amputation rate and mortality.

Key words: Acute limb ischaemia, Embolectomy, Amputation, Thromboembolism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肢体缺血(ALI)的外科干预。
研究目的评估急性肢体缺血(ALI)患者的表现、病因、干预措施和治疗效果:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦卡拉奇阿迦汗大学医院外科,2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月:方法:回顾性评估104例因ALI接受手术治疗的患者的记录。诊断由影像学(超声/CTA/常规血管造影)证实。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析了人口统计学特征、并发症、病因和结果:患者平均年龄为(58.89 ± 12.6)岁,其中女性(54.8%,n = 57),男性(45.2%,n = 47)。高血压(54.8%,n = 57)、糖尿病(46.2%,n = 48)和心房颤动(34.6%,n = 36)是常见的合并症。血栓栓塞(67.3%,n = 70)和血栓闭塞(32.7%,n = 34)是主要病因,主要影响下肢(66.3%,n = 58)和股动脉(51.9%,n = 54)。大多数病例被归类为卢瑟福分类 2A(53.8%;56 例)和 2B(44.2%;46 例);58 例(55.8%)患者被归类为 ASA III 级,36 例(34.6%)患者被归类为 ASA IV 级。栓子切除术(80.8%,n = 84)是最主要的干预措施,截肢率(17.3%,n = 18)和死亡率(5.8%,n = 6):结论:大多数 ALI 患者为卢瑟福 II 级,病因为血栓栓塞。栓塞切除术是最常见的手术,截肢率和死亡率都很高:急性肢体缺血、栓塞切除术、截肢、血栓栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Multi-Slice Spiral CT Renal Angiography Combined with Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Association of Vitamin D with Haematological Inflammatory Indices in Patients with Back Pain. Beyond Laparoscopy: Embracing a Scarless Solution for Gallstones "The Notes". Clinical Effectiveness of Green Tea Extracts as a Local Haemostatic Agent Following Mandibular Molar Extraction. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract in Patients with Hirschsprung Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1