--------Comparison of Hybrid-Simulation-Based Teaching with Traditional Teaching of Pharmacology.

Samia Perwaiz Khan, Ambreen Usmani, Ambareen Khan
{"title":"--------Comparison of Hybrid-Simulation-Based Teaching with Traditional Teaching of Pharmacology.","authors":"Samia Perwaiz Khan, Ambreen Usmani, Ambareen Khan","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcome of traditional teaching with hybrid simulation-based teaching for undergraduate medical students. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pharmacology, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>One hundred students from MBBS 3rd year were included in the study after taking the informed consent. Participants were divided into two cross-over groups and sampling was done randomly. Group A: (even roll numbers, n = 50) was the control group, taught by traditional lecture on positive inotropic medicines. Group B: (with odd roll numbers, n = 50) was the intervention group, taught the same topic by simulation-based teaching through 5 case scenarios. The teaching of this group was reinforced by role plays. Scores of post-test and retention test were compared by applying the Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students taught by traditional lectures i.e., Group A, their post-test mean scores were 30.7 ± 5.6, whereas Group B scored 45.7 ± 3.3, taught by hybrid stimulation (p <0.001). Retention test (MCQs based) was conducted after one month in which Group A obtained a mean score of 18.8 ± 9 with a passing percentage of approximately 30, whereas Group B obtained a score of 41.3 ± 5.6 (p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid-simulation-based teaching improved the immediate test scores as well as retention.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Traditional teaching, Hybrid-simulation, MCQs, Retention test, Intervention group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome of traditional teaching with hybrid simulation-based teaching for undergraduate medical students. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pharmacology, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to August 2023.

Study design: Quasi-experimental study.

Methodology: One hundred students from MBBS 3rd year were included in the study after taking the informed consent. Participants were divided into two cross-over groups and sampling was done randomly. Group A: (even roll numbers, n = 50) was the control group, taught by traditional lecture on positive inotropic medicines. Group B: (with odd roll numbers, n = 50) was the intervention group, taught the same topic by simulation-based teaching through 5 case scenarios. The teaching of this group was reinforced by role plays. Scores of post-test and retention test were compared by applying the Student's t-test.

Results: Students taught by traditional lectures i.e., Group A, their post-test mean scores were 30.7 ± 5.6, whereas Group B scored 45.7 ± 3.3, taught by hybrid stimulation (p <0.001). Retention test (MCQs based) was conducted after one month in which Group A obtained a mean score of 18.8 ± 9 with a passing percentage of approximately 30, whereas Group B obtained a score of 41.3 ± 5.6 (p <0.001).

Conclusion: Hybrid-simulation-based teaching improved the immediate test scores as well as retention.

Key words: Traditional teaching, Hybrid-simulation, MCQs, Retention test, Intervention group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
-------- 基于混合模拟的药理学教学与传统教学的比较。
目的比较医学本科生传统教学与混合模拟教学的效果。研究地点和时间:研究设计:准实验研究:研究方法:准实验研究:在获得知情同意后,100 名 MBBS 三年级学生被纳入研究。参与者分为两个交叉组,随机抽样。A 组:(偶数,n = 50)为对照组,以传统方式讲授正性肌力药物。B 组:(奇数,n = 50)为干预组,通过 5 个案例情景进行模拟教学。该组的教学通过角色扮演得到加强。通过学生 t 检验比较了后测和保留率测试的得分:结果:采用传统授课方式的 A 组学生,其后测平均得分为(30.7 ± 5.6)分,而采用混合刺激授课方式的 B 组学生,其后测平均得分为(45.7 ± 3.3)分:基于混合模拟的教学提高了学生的即时考试成绩和保持率:传统教学 混合模拟 MCQs 保留率测试 干预组
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reperfusion Therapy for Trousseau Syndrome-Related Cerebral Infarction: A Case-Control Analysis of Efficacy and Prognosis. Response to Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) Therapy in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency. Screening for Early Biomarkers of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats Through Serum Metabolomics Technology. Spindle Cell Neoplasms of Pancreas. Surgical Interventions for Acute Limb Ischaemia (ALI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1