--------Comparison of Hybrid-Simulation-Based Teaching with Traditional Teaching of Pharmacology.

Samia Perwaiz Khan, Ambreen Usmani, Ambareen Khan
{"title":"--------Comparison of Hybrid-Simulation-Based Teaching with Traditional Teaching of Pharmacology.","authors":"Samia Perwaiz Khan, Ambreen Usmani, Ambareen Khan","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcome of traditional teaching with hybrid simulation-based teaching for undergraduate medical students. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pharmacology, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>One hundred students from MBBS 3rd year were included in the study after taking the informed consent. Participants were divided into two cross-over groups and sampling was done randomly. Group A: (even roll numbers, n = 50) was the control group, taught by traditional lecture on positive inotropic medicines. Group B: (with odd roll numbers, n = 50) was the intervention group, taught the same topic by simulation-based teaching through 5 case scenarios. The teaching of this group was reinforced by role plays. Scores of post-test and retention test were compared by applying the Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students taught by traditional lectures i.e., Group A, their post-test mean scores were 30.7 ± 5.6, whereas Group B scored 45.7 ± 3.3, taught by hybrid stimulation (p <0.001). Retention test (MCQs based) was conducted after one month in which Group A obtained a mean score of 18.8 ± 9 with a passing percentage of approximately 30, whereas Group B obtained a score of 41.3 ± 5.6 (p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid-simulation-based teaching improved the immediate test scores as well as retention.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Traditional teaching, Hybrid-simulation, MCQs, Retention test, Intervention group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 8","pages":"963-967"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome of traditional teaching with hybrid simulation-based teaching for undergraduate medical students. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pharmacology, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, from June to August 2023.

Study design: Quasi-experimental study.

Methodology: One hundred students from MBBS 3rd year were included in the study after taking the informed consent. Participants were divided into two cross-over groups and sampling was done randomly. Group A: (even roll numbers, n = 50) was the control group, taught by traditional lecture on positive inotropic medicines. Group B: (with odd roll numbers, n = 50) was the intervention group, taught the same topic by simulation-based teaching through 5 case scenarios. The teaching of this group was reinforced by role plays. Scores of post-test and retention test were compared by applying the Student's t-test.

Results: Students taught by traditional lectures i.e., Group A, their post-test mean scores were 30.7 ± 5.6, whereas Group B scored 45.7 ± 3.3, taught by hybrid stimulation (p <0.001). Retention test (MCQs based) was conducted after one month in which Group A obtained a mean score of 18.8 ± 9 with a passing percentage of approximately 30, whereas Group B obtained a score of 41.3 ± 5.6 (p <0.001).

Conclusion: Hybrid-simulation-based teaching improved the immediate test scores as well as retention.

Key words: Traditional teaching, Hybrid-simulation, MCQs, Retention test, Intervention group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
-------- 基于混合模拟的药理学教学与传统教学的比较。
目的比较医学本科生传统教学与混合模拟教学的效果。研究地点和时间:研究设计:准实验研究:研究方法:准实验研究:在获得知情同意后,100 名 MBBS 三年级学生被纳入研究。参与者分为两个交叉组,随机抽样。A 组:(偶数,n = 50)为对照组,以传统方式讲授正性肌力药物。B 组:(奇数,n = 50)为干预组,通过 5 个案例情景进行模拟教学。该组的教学通过角色扮演得到加强。通过学生 t 检验比较了后测和保留率测试的得分:结果:采用传统授课方式的 A 组学生,其后测平均得分为(30.7 ± 5.6)分,而采用混合刺激授课方式的 B 组学生,其后测平均得分为(45.7 ± 3.3)分:基于混合模拟的教学提高了学生的即时考试成绩和保持率:传统教学 混合模拟 MCQs 保留率测试 干预组
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frequency of Anti-Ganglioside Antibodies and Their Clinical Correlates in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Single-Centre Study in Pakistan. Prognostic Impact of Wilms' Tumour 1 Mutation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. The Need for Dedicated Brain Injury Rehabilitation Units in Pakistan. Frequency of Impaired Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Results in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis Within 18 Months after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1