Central corneal thickness and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: a Mendelian randomisation mediation analysis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-324996
Andreas Katsimpris, Sebastian-Edgar Baumeister, Hansjörg Baurecht, Andrew J Tatham, Michael Nolde
{"title":"Central corneal thickness and the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: a Mendelian randomisation mediation analysis","authors":"Andreas Katsimpris, Sebastian-Edgar Baumeister, Hansjörg Baurecht, Andrew J Tatham, Michael Nolde","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The association of central corneal thickness (CCT) with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) remains uncertain. Although several observational studies assessing this relationship have reported an inverse association between CCT and POAG, this could be the result of collider bias. In this study, we leveraged human genetic data to assess through Mendelian randomisation (MR) the effect of CCT on POAG risk and whether this effect is mediated by intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. Methods We used 24 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with CCT (p value<5×10−8) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) (N=17 803) provided by the International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium and 53 SNPs associated with IOP (p value<5×10−8) from a GWAS of the UK Biobank (UKBB) (N=97 653). We related these instruments to POAG using a GWAS meta-analysis of 8283 POAG cases and 753 827 controls from UKBB and FinnGen. Results MR analysis suggested a positive association between CCT and POAG (OR of POAG per 50 µm increase in CCT: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.61; p value<0.01). MR mediation analysis showed that 28.4% of the total effect of CCT on POAG risk was mediated through changes in IOP. The primary results were consistent with estimates of pleiotropy-robust MR methods. Conclusion Contrary to most observational studies, our results showed that a higher CCT is associated with an increased risk of POAG. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The association of central corneal thickness (CCT) with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) remains uncertain. Although several observational studies assessing this relationship have reported an inverse association between CCT and POAG, this could be the result of collider bias. In this study, we leveraged human genetic data to assess through Mendelian randomisation (MR) the effect of CCT on POAG risk and whether this effect is mediated by intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. Methods We used 24 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with CCT (p value<5×10−8) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) (N=17 803) provided by the International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium and 53 SNPs associated with IOP (p value<5×10−8) from a GWAS of the UK Biobank (UKBB) (N=97 653). We related these instruments to POAG using a GWAS meta-analysis of 8283 POAG cases and 753 827 controls from UKBB and FinnGen. Results MR analysis suggested a positive association between CCT and POAG (OR of POAG per 50 µm increase in CCT: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.61; p value<0.01). MR mediation analysis showed that 28.4% of the total effect of CCT on POAG risk was mediated through changes in IOP. The primary results were consistent with estimates of pleiotropy-robust MR methods. Conclusion Contrary to most observational studies, our results showed that a higher CCT is associated with an increased risk of POAG. Data are available upon reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中央角膜厚度与原发性开角型青光眼的风险:孟德尔随机化中介分析
背景角膜中央厚度(CCT)与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的关系仍不确定。尽管一些评估这种关系的观察性研究报告称,CCT 与 POAG 之间存在反向关系,但这可能是碰撞偏差的结果。在本研究中,我们利用人类基因数据,通过孟德尔随机化(MR)评估了 CCT 对 POAG 风险的影响,以及这种影响是否由眼压(IOP)变化介导。方法 我们使用了国际青光眼遗传学联合会提供的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)(N=17 803)中与CCT相关的24个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)(P值<5×10-8),以及英国生物库(UKB)GWAS(N=97 653)中与IOP相关的53个SNPs(P值<5×10-8)。我们通过对来自 UKBB 和 FinnGen 的 8283 例 POAG 病例和 753 827 例对照进行 GWAS 元分析,将这些工具与 POAG 联系起来。 结果 MR 分析表明,CCT 与 POAG 呈正相关(CCT 每增加 50 µm 的 POAG OR:1.38;95% CI:1.18 至 1.61;P 值<0.01)。MR 中介分析显示,CCT 对 POAG 风险的总影响中有 28.4% 是通过眼压变化中介的。主要结果与多向性稳健磁共振方法的估计结果一致。结论 与大多数观察性研究相反,我们的研究结果表明,较高的 CCT 与 POAG 风险的增加有关。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
At a glance Deep learning-based normative database of anterior chamber dimensions for angle closure assessment: the Singapore Chinese Eye Study In vivo lacrimal gland imaging artefact assessment based on swept-source optical coherence tomography for dry eye disease Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice Longitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1