Detection of glaucoma progression on longitudinal series of en-face macular optical coherence tomography angiography images with a deep learning model

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-324528
Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Youwei Liang, Sasan Moghimi, Pengtao Xie, Takashi Nishida, Golnoush Mahmoudinezhad, Medi Eslani, Evan Walker, Alireza Kamalipour, Eleonora Micheletti, Jo-Hsuan Wu, Mark Christopher, Linda M Zangwill, Tara Javidi, Robert N Weinreb
{"title":"Detection of glaucoma progression on longitudinal series of en-face macular optical coherence tomography angiography images with a deep learning model","authors":"Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Youwei Liang, Sasan Moghimi, Pengtao Xie, Takashi Nishida, Golnoush Mahmoudinezhad, Medi Eslani, Evan Walker, Alireza Kamalipour, Eleonora Micheletti, Jo-Hsuan Wu, Mark Christopher, Linda M Zangwill, Tara Javidi, Robert N Weinreb","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims To design a deep learning (DL) model for the detection of glaucoma progression with a longitudinal series of macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. Methods 202 eyes of 134 patients with open-angle glaucoma with ≥4 OCTA visits were followed for an average of 3.5 years. Glaucoma progression was defined as having a statistically significant negative 24-2 visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) rate. The baseline and final macular OCTA images were aligned according to centre of fovea avascular zone automatically, by checking the highest value of correlation between the two images. A customised convolutional neural network (CNN) was designed for classification. A comparison of the CNN to logistic regression model for whole image vessel density (wiVD) loss on detection of glaucoma progression was performed. The performance of the model was defined based on the confusion matrix of the validation dataset and the area under receiver operating characteristics (AUC). Results The average (95% CI) baseline VF MD was −3.4 (−4.1 to −2.7) dB. 28 (14%) eyes demonstrated glaucoma progression. The AUC (95% CI) of the DL model for the detection of glaucoma progression was 0.81 (0.59 to 0.93). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (95% CI) of DL model were 67% (34% to 78%), 83% (42% to 97%) and 80% (52% to 95%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) for the detection of glaucoma progression based on the logistic regression model was lower than the DL model (0.69 (0.50 to 0.88)). Conclusion The optimised DL model detected glaucoma progression based on longitudinal macular OCTA images showed good performance. With external validation, it could enhance detection of glaucoma progression. Trial registration number [NCT00221897][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00221897&atom=%2Fbjophthalmol%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F07%2Fbjo-2023-324528.atom","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims To design a deep learning (DL) model for the detection of glaucoma progression with a longitudinal series of macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. Methods 202 eyes of 134 patients with open-angle glaucoma with ≥4 OCTA visits were followed for an average of 3.5 years. Glaucoma progression was defined as having a statistically significant negative 24-2 visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) rate. The baseline and final macular OCTA images were aligned according to centre of fovea avascular zone automatically, by checking the highest value of correlation between the two images. A customised convolutional neural network (CNN) was designed for classification. A comparison of the CNN to logistic regression model for whole image vessel density (wiVD) loss on detection of glaucoma progression was performed. The performance of the model was defined based on the confusion matrix of the validation dataset and the area under receiver operating characteristics (AUC). Results The average (95% CI) baseline VF MD was −3.4 (−4.1 to −2.7) dB. 28 (14%) eyes demonstrated glaucoma progression. The AUC (95% CI) of the DL model for the detection of glaucoma progression was 0.81 (0.59 to 0.93). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (95% CI) of DL model were 67% (34% to 78%), 83% (42% to 97%) and 80% (52% to 95%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) for the detection of glaucoma progression based on the logistic regression model was lower than the DL model (0.69 (0.50 to 0.88)). Conclusion The optimised DL model detected glaucoma progression based on longitudinal macular OCTA images showed good performance. With external validation, it could enhance detection of glaucoma progression. Trial registration number [NCT00221897][1]. Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00221897&atom=%2Fbjophthalmol%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F07%2Fbjo-2023-324528.atom
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习模型检测纵向系列面黄斑光学相干断层血管造影图像上的青光眼进展情况
背景/目的 设计一种深度学习(DL)模型,利用纵向系列黄斑光学相干断层血管造影(OCTA)图像检测青光眼进展。方法 对 134 名 OCTA 检查次数≥4 次的开角型青光眼患者的 202 只眼睛进行了平均 3.5 年的随访。青光眼进展的定义是24-2视野(VF)平均偏差(MD)率出现统计学意义上的负值。基线和最终黄斑 OCTA 图像根据眼窝血管区中心自动对齐,方法是检查两幅图像之间的最高相关值。设计了一个定制的卷积神经网络(CNN)用于分类。针对整个图像血管密度(wiVD)损失对青光眼进展的检测,将 CNN 与逻辑回归模型进行了比较。根据验证数据集的混淆矩阵和接受者操作特征下面积(AUC)来确定模型的性能。结果 平均(95% CI)基线 VF MD 为 -3.4 (-4.1 to -2.7) dB。28(14%)只眼出现青光眼进展。DL 模型检测青光眼进展的 AUC(95% CI)为 0.81(0.59 至 0.93)。DL模型的灵敏度、特异度和准确度(95% CI)分别为67%(34%至78%)、83%(42%至97%)和80%(52%至95%)。基于逻辑回归模型检测青光眼进展的 AUC(95% CI)低于 DL 模型(0.69(0.50 至 0.88))。结论 基于纵向黄斑 OCTA 图像检测青光眼进展的优化 DL 模型表现良好。通过外部验证,该模型可提高对青光眼进展的检测能力。试验注册号[NCT00221897][1]。如有合理要求,可提供数据。本研究中生成和/或分析的数据集可向通讯作者索取。[1]:/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00221897&atom=%2Fbjophthalmol%2Fearly%2F2024%2F08%2F07%2Fbjo-2023-324528.atom
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
At a glance Deep learning-based normative database of anterior chamber dimensions for angle closure assessment: the Singapore Chinese Eye Study In vivo lacrimal gland imaging artefact assessment based on swept-source optical coherence tomography for dry eye disease Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice Longitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1