Mapping paleoelevations along active continental margins with igneous geochemistry: A case study from South America

IF 7.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Gondwana Research Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.gr.2024.07.010
Bingxi Liu , Simon Williams , Maria Seton , Guochun Zhao
{"title":"Mapping paleoelevations along active continental margins with igneous geochemistry: A case study from South America","authors":"Bingxi Liu ,&nbsp;Simon Williams ,&nbsp;Maria Seton ,&nbsp;Guochun Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.gr.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mountains and mountain ranges, often situated at convergent plate margins, play a pivotal role in many fields of the Earth, climate, and biological sciences. Reconstructing past episodes of mountain building from the geological rock record is one of the main challenges for unravelling the ancient physical geography of Earth’s surface. Established methods for quantifying past elevations traditionally relied on sedimentary rocks, but in recent years, alternative approaches have emerged on the basis that geochemical signatures of magmatic rocks formed in convergent settings correlate with crustal thickness or elevation. Consequently, methods based on igneous samples have the potential to allow quantitative mapping of past topographic change for large spans of space and time where existing maps are largely based on a qualitative approach. Here, we investigate the application of paleoelevation estimates derived from geochemistry using the western margin of South America as a case study. We investigate their consistency with independent indicators of past elevations such as stratigraphy, stable isotopes, fossils etc. for Cenozoic samples along the Andean margin. For older times, we compare the estimated paleoelevations with more general aspects of the geological record, as well as paleoelevations from global paleogeography models widely used in climate modelling studies, to evaluate the extent to which these models are consistent with the igneous geochemical proxies. We find that estimates based on multiple geochemical proxies, and which account for variations in elevation as a function of MgO, are preferable to those based on individual proxies. The multi-mohometer estimates yield estimates of elevation that better match both present-day topography and Cenozoic paleoelevations, and retain more samples during the data filtering stage. In deeper time, we show that igneous geochemistry quantifies changes in elevation related to documented phases of crustal thickening and thinning, and is thus likely to allow improvements to existing maps of paleotopography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12761,"journal":{"name":"Gondwana Research","volume":"134 ","pages":"Pages 285-297"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gondwana Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X24002016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mountains and mountain ranges, often situated at convergent plate margins, play a pivotal role in many fields of the Earth, climate, and biological sciences. Reconstructing past episodes of mountain building from the geological rock record is one of the main challenges for unravelling the ancient physical geography of Earth’s surface. Established methods for quantifying past elevations traditionally relied on sedimentary rocks, but in recent years, alternative approaches have emerged on the basis that geochemical signatures of magmatic rocks formed in convergent settings correlate with crustal thickness or elevation. Consequently, methods based on igneous samples have the potential to allow quantitative mapping of past topographic change for large spans of space and time where existing maps are largely based on a qualitative approach. Here, we investigate the application of paleoelevation estimates derived from geochemistry using the western margin of South America as a case study. We investigate their consistency with independent indicators of past elevations such as stratigraphy, stable isotopes, fossils etc. for Cenozoic samples along the Andean margin. For older times, we compare the estimated paleoelevations with more general aspects of the geological record, as well as paleoelevations from global paleogeography models widely used in climate modelling studies, to evaluate the extent to which these models are consistent with the igneous geochemical proxies. We find that estimates based on multiple geochemical proxies, and which account for variations in elevation as a function of MgO, are preferable to those based on individual proxies. The multi-mohometer estimates yield estimates of elevation that better match both present-day topography and Cenozoic paleoelevations, and retain more samples during the data filtering stage. In deeper time, we show that igneous geochemistry quantifies changes in elevation related to documented phases of crustal thickening and thinning, and is thus likely to allow improvements to existing maps of paleotopography.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用火成岩地球化学方法绘制活动大陆边缘古高程图:南美洲案例研究
山脉通常位于板块交汇的边缘,在地球、气候和生物科学的许多领域都发挥着举足轻重的作用。从地质岩石记录中重建过去的造山运动是揭示地球表面古代自然地理的主要挑战之一。传统上,量化过去海拔高度的既定方法依赖于沉积岩,但近年来出现了另一种方法,其依据是在汇聚环境中形成的岩浆岩的地球化学特征与地壳厚度或海拔高度相关。因此,基于火成岩样本的方法有可能定量绘制大跨度时空的过去地形变化图,而现有的地图主要基于定性方法。在这里,我们以南美洲西缘为例,研究了从地球化学中得出的古海拔估计值的应用。我们研究了安第斯山脉边缘新生代样本的古海拔与地层、稳定同位素、化石等过去海拔的独立指标的一致性。对于更早的年代,我们将估算的古海拔高度与地质记录的更多方面以及气候模拟研究中广泛使用的全球古地理模型的古海拔高度进行比较,以评估这些模型与火成岩地球化学代用指标的一致性程度。我们发现,基于多种地球化学代用指标并考虑到海拔高度随氧化镁变化而变化的估算结果,要优于基于单个代用指标的估算结果。多测高计估算得出的海拔高度更符合当今地形和新生代古海拔高度,并在数据过滤阶段保留了更多样本。在更深的时间内,我们表明火成岩地球化学可以量化与记录的地壳增厚和减薄阶段相关的海拔变化,因此有可能改进现有的古地形图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gondwana Research
Gondwana Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
298
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, ''GR FOCUS''. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category ''GR LETTERS''.
期刊最新文献
Impact of coastal industrialization and urbanization on marine phosphorus cycle: Insights from Daya Bay and Zhelin Bay Environmental impact of technological innovation under energy transition in Europe: Do energy exporters play a significant role? Spatiotemporal variations of Early to Middle Paleozoic magmatism in northern Beishan: Implications for accretionary and collisional processes in the southern Central Asian Orogenic belt Sedimentary provenance analysis by coupled detrital zircon U-Pb, Hf isotopes of the Paleoproterozoic Belcher Group, Nunavut, Canada and implications for sedimentation during the opening and closure of the Manikewan Ocean Coupling of shallow marine redox change and multi-stage animal radiations during the early Cambrian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1