Factors affecting biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles: machine learning-assisted identification.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1
José A Ortiz, B Lledó, R Morales, A Máñez-Grau, A Cascales, A Rodríguez-Arnedo, Juan C Castillo, A Bernabeu, R Bernabeu
{"title":"Factors affecting biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles: machine learning-assisted identification.","authors":"José A Ortiz, B Lledó, R Morales, A Máñez-Grau, A Cascales, A Rodríguez-Arnedo, Juan C Castillo, A Bernabeu, R Bernabeu","doi":"10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the factors influencing the likelihood of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) after transfer of a euploid embryo from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed an observational, retrospective cohort design, encompassing 6020 embryos from 2879 PGT-A cycles conducted between February 2013 and September 2021. Trophectoderm biopsies in day 5 (D5) or day 6 (D6) blastocysts were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Only single embryo transfers (SET) were considered, totaling 1161 transfers. Of these, 49.9% resulted in positive pregnancy tests, with 18.3% experiencing BPL. To establish a predictive model for BPL, both classical statistical methods and five different supervised classification machine learning algorithms were used. A total of forty-seven factors were incorporated as predictor variables in the machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the optimization process for each model, various performance metrics were computed. Random Forest model emerged as the best model, boasting the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.913, alongside an accuracy of 0.830, positive predictive value of 0.857, and negative predictive value of 0.807. For the selected model, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were determined for each of the variables to establish which had the best predictive ability. Notably, variables pertaining to embryo biopsy demonstrated the greatest predictive capacity, followed by factors associated with ovarian stimulation (COS), maternal age, and paternal age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Random Forest model had a higher predictive power for identifying BPL occurrences in PGT-A cycles. Specifically, variables associated with the embryo biopsy procedure (biopsy day, number of biopsied embryos, and number of biopsied cells) and ovarian stimulation (number of oocytes retrieved and duration of stimulation), exhibited the strongest predictive power.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the factors influencing the likelihood of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) after transfer of a euploid embryo from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.

Methods: The study employed an observational, retrospective cohort design, encompassing 6020 embryos from 2879 PGT-A cycles conducted between February 2013 and September 2021. Trophectoderm biopsies in day 5 (D5) or day 6 (D6) blastocysts were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Only single embryo transfers (SET) were considered, totaling 1161 transfers. Of these, 49.9% resulted in positive pregnancy tests, with 18.3% experiencing BPL. To establish a predictive model for BPL, both classical statistical methods and five different supervised classification machine learning algorithms were used. A total of forty-seven factors were incorporated as predictor variables in the machine learning models.

Results: Throughout the optimization process for each model, various performance metrics were computed. Random Forest model emerged as the best model, boasting the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.913, alongside an accuracy of 0.830, positive predictive value of 0.857, and negative predictive value of 0.807. For the selected model, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were determined for each of the variables to establish which had the best predictive ability. Notably, variables pertaining to embryo biopsy demonstrated the greatest predictive capacity, followed by factors associated with ovarian stimulation (COS), maternal age, and paternal age.

Conclusions: The Random Forest model had a higher predictive power for identifying BPL occurrences in PGT-A cycles. Specifically, variables associated with the embryo biopsy procedure (biopsy day, number of biopsied embryos, and number of biopsied cells) and ovarian stimulation (number of oocytes retrieved and duration of stimulation), exhibited the strongest predictive power.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)周期中生化妊娠损失(BPL)的因素:机器学习辅助识别。
目的:确定影响胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)周期的优倍体胚胎移植后生化妊娠丢失(BPL)可能性的因素:该研究采用了观察性、回顾性队列设计,涵盖了 2013 年 2 月至 2021 年 9 月期间进行的 2879 个 PGT-A 周期中的 6020 个胚胎。对第 5 天(D5)或第 6 天(D6)囊胚的前胚层活检组织进行了新一代测序(NGS)分析。只考虑了单胚胎移植(SET),共进行了 1161 次移植。其中 49.9% 的胚胎移植后妊娠试验呈阳性,18.3% 的胚胎移植后妊娠试验呈阴性。为了建立 BPL 的预测模型,我们使用了经典统计方法和五种不同的监督分类机器学习算法。在机器学习模型中,共纳入了 47 个因素作为预测变量:在每个模型的整个优化过程中,计算了各种性能指标。随机森林模型成为最佳模型,其 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)值最高,为 0.913,准确率为 0.830,正预测值为 0.857,负预测值为 0.807。在选定的模型中,为每个变量确定了 SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations)值,以确定哪个变量具有最佳预测能力。值得注意的是,胚胎活检相关变量的预测能力最强,其次是卵巢刺激相关因素(COS)、母体年龄和父方年龄:结论:随机森林模型对识别 PGT-A 周期中出现的 BPL 有更高的预测能力。具体而言,与胚胎活检程序(活检日、活检胚胎数和活检细胞数)和卵巢刺激(取卵细胞数和刺激持续时间)相关的变量具有最强的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
期刊最新文献
Discussion on the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of uterine artery blood flow parameters and serum PLGF and sFlt-1 in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Asiaticoside ameliorates uterine injury induced by zearalenone in mice by reversing endometrial barrier disruption, oxidative stress and apoptosis Effect of estradiol supplementation on luteal support following a significant reduction in serum estradiol levels after hCG triggering: a prospective randomized controlled trial Enhancing predictive models for egg donation: time to blastocyst hatching and machine learning insights Correction: IVF laboratory management through workflow-based RFID tag witnessing and real-time information entry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1